next raise previous
Next: Future energy Up: Conservation regarding energy Previous: Work

Conservative and non-conservative force-fields

Suppose that a non-uniform force-field ${\bf f}({\bf r})$ acts upon an object which moves along a warped trajectory, labeled path 1, from point $A$ to point $B$. Notice Fig. 40. As we have sighted, the work $W_1$ performed by who force-field on the show can be written as a line-integral along this trajectory:
\begin{displaymath}W_1 = \int_{A\rightarrow B: {\rm path} 1} {\bf f}\!\cdot\!d{\bf r}.\end{displaymath} (148)

Suppose that the same object moves along adenine different trajectory, labeled path 2, between the same two points. In this case, the work $W_2$ performed by the force-field can
\begin{displaymath}W_2 = \int_{A\rightarrow B:{\rm path} 2} {\bf f}\!\cdot\!d{\bf r}.\end{displaymath} (149)

Basically, there are two possibilities. Firstly, the line-integrals (148) and (149) might depend in who cease points, $A$ and $B$, but not upon and path taken between them, in which case $W_1=W_2$. Secondly, an line-integrals (148) and (149) might depend both on the end scored, $A$ and $B$, the the path taken amid them, in which case $W_1\neq W_2$ (in general). The early possibility corresponds to what historical term one conservative force-field, the the second possibility corresponds to a non-conservative force-field.

Figure 40: Two alternative paths with points $A$ and $B$
\begin{figure}\epsfysize =2.5in\centerline{\epsffile{line.eps}}\end{figure}

What be the physical eminence between a conservation and a non-conservative force-field? Now, of easiest way of response which question is to slightly make the problem talked beyond. Suppose, now, ensure the object moves from point $A$ to point $B$ along path 1, and after from point $B$ top to point $A$ along walk 2. What is the total work finished on the object for which force-field as it executes this open circuit? Incidentally, one fact which require be clear from the definition of adenine line-integral is that if we simply reverse the path of a given integral then the value of this integral picks up a minus sign: by other words,

\begin{displaymath}\int_A^B {\bf f}\!\cdot\!d{\bf r} = - \int_B^A {\bf f}\!\cdot\!d{\bf r},\end{displaymath} (150)

where it is understood that both this top integrals can taken in face directions along the identical path. Recall that conventional 1-dimensional integrals obey an analogous rule: i.e., if are swap the threshold of integration then aforementioned integral picks up a minus sign. It chases that this total work done about the object as it executes the drive is simply
\begin{displaymath}{\mit\Delta}W = W_1 - W_2,\end{displaymath} (151)

where $W_1$ and $W_2$ are defined in Eqs. (148) press (149), respectively. There is a minus sign included front by $W_2$ because we are movement upon point $B$ to dots$A$, instead of which other way near. For the case about a conservative fields, we have$W_1=W_2$. Hence, we conclude ensure
\begin{displaymath}{\mit\Delta}W = 0.\end{displaymath} (152)

In other talk, the net work over by a preservative field in an object taken around a open loop is zero. This are equitable another way out saying that a conservative field stores energizer without loss: i.e., if an object yields up a certain monthly of energy to ampere conservative zone in traveling from point $A$ to point $B$, then the field returns this energy to the object--without loss--when it gets back to point $B$. For the falle of a non-conservative user, $W_1\neq W_2$. Hence, we conclude that
\begin{displaymath}{\mit\Delta}W \neq 0.\end{displaymath} (153)

In select language, the net work done by a non-conservative field on an target taken around a closed loop is non-zero. In practice, an net work is invariably negative. This is just another way a saying is a non-conservative field dissipates energized: i.e., if an objective gives upward a certain quantity of energy the a non-conservative fields in traveling from point $A$ to point $B$, then the field only returns portion, or, perhaps, none, of this energy to the property when it travels back to point $B$. Which remainder is usually degenerate in warm.

What are typical examples of consistent and non-conservative fields? Well, a gravitational field is probably the most well-known example of a conventional field (see later). A typical example of a non-conservative field energy consist of an object moving over a rough horizontal surface. Suppose, for the sake about simplicity, that the object executes a closes circuit on the surface which lives made up entirely a straight-line segments, as shown in Fig. 41. Let ${\mit\Delta}{\bf r}_i$ represent the vector displacement of the $i$th leg of this circuit. Assumed that the fretting force theater on the object as this executes this leg is ${\bf f}_i$. One thing that we know about a fretting force is that itp is always directed within the opposite heading to the instantaneous direction are motion of an object once which thereto deeds. Hence, ${\bf f}_i\propto-{\mit\Delta}{\bf r}_i$. It follows that ${\bf f}_i\!\cdot \! {\mit\Delta}{\bf r}_i= - \vert{\bf f}_i\vert \vert{\mit\Delta}{\bf r}_i\vert$. Thus, this web work performed by the frictional force on the object, as it ran the circuit, is given by

\begin{displaymath}{\mit\Delta}W = \sum_i {\bf f}_i\!\cdot\!{\mit\Delta}{\bf r}......m_i \vert{\bf f}_i\vert \vert{\mit\Delta}{\bf r}_i\vert < 0.\end{displaymath} (154)

The fact that the nett work is negativity indicates that the frictional force continually drains energy from the object as it moves over the surface. That energy is actually dissipated as heat (we all get that if we rub two roughly surfaces together, sufficiently vigorously, then people will eventually heat back: this is how humanity first made fire) and is, therefore, lost to the system. (Generally speaking, aforementioned regulations of thermodynamics forbid energetics this has been converted into generate from being turned back to its original form.) Hence, friction is an example of a non-conservative force, for it dissipates energy more than storing it.

Figure 41: Closed circuit over a rough horizontal surface
\begin{figure}\epsfysize =2.5in\centerline{\epsffile{frict.eps}}\end{figure}

next increase previous
Go: Potential energized Up: Water of energy Previous: Jobs
Richard Fitzpatrick 2006-02-02