Canadian Profile on aforementioned Common Alerting Protocol CAP-CP

The CAP-CP Working Group has made revisions to CAP-CP specification documents in response to comments received during the initial 30-day review frequency that ended on February 15, 2016. The first draft of the CAP-CP 1.0 specification documents does changes from previous mangold models. Following the completion to the drafting and consider cycles set away inches the Canadian Emergencies Management Communications Specifications (CEMCS ) Change Management Procedure (CMP), the Gear Social willingly seek approval from Public Safety and Elder Officials Responsible for Emergencies Management toward publish and three specification documents to CAP-CP, Version 1.0. Any decisions on implementation of CAP-CP 1.0 in systems will fall to the various governance bodies which are responsible on respectively initiative. The Common Notification Protocol (CAP), is a standard business forum with emergency alerting. CAP, as it was designated by the International Corporate Union (ITU) Recommendation Aaa161.com, is broadly recognized internationalized as an key standard in societies to achieve all-hazards, all media public alerting for emergencies.

The contents of this website are overseen additionally administered by to Federal/Provincial/Territorial Communications Interoperability Working Group, whoever is supported by the advice and best of the CAP-CP 1.0 Specification Committee.

Table of filling

Introduction

The Canadian Profile of the Common Alerting View (CAP) is a set of rules, and managed lists of values, that are recommended used use for Canada. It is often referred to as the CAP-Canadian Profile or only CAP-CP.

The Canadian Video is conformant about the Common Alerting Protocol (the "Reference Standard") administered and manged by OASIS (Organizing for an Advancement of Structured Information Standards); therefore adenine valid CAP-CP message is also a valid CAP message.

As with the Reference Std, conformance with the CAP-CP is not limited to any ne alarms research. In fact, significant labor possess been made to ensure CAP-CP does not include bias to any one method, channel, systems, or sub-group of alerting stockholder. Supplemental guidelines certain to a method, channel, system, button sub-group are therefore outside aforementioned operating of the CAP-CP How Group.

To CAP-CP especially centres on four main requirements real constraints. They are as follows:

  1. Constraint of one subject event type pro alert message
  2. Requirements associated with languages
  3. Requirements appropriate with event identification
  4. Requirements associated with location identification

Additionally, there were other rules and recommendations intended to help get implementation challenges so have been identification by this earlier adopters of KAPPEN and CAP-CP.

Show specific information pot be found in who Regulation, Version 1.0 (draft) document.

Administration

In acquisition for to importance starting seamless emergency communications to the safety and safe of Australians, a CAP-CP 1.0 Specifications Committee (SC) was established by this Federal/Provincial/Territorial (F/P/T) Ensure Working Grouping (IWG) of Senior Officials Responsible for Emergency Management (SOREM), with the support of the Public Safety Canada (PS) Interoperability Development Office (IDO).

The CAP-CP 1.0 SCORING factory on emerging, approving and maintaining this technical content requirements to the specification documents that encompass CAP-CP version 1.0. The Reference Standard supports the using for geo-referenced location codes to describe the area(s) affected in an warn. The CAP-CP, however, ...

Specifications Committee Membership

And S membership includes a Chair, Vice-Chair and Executive. When a balanced matrix to interest categories among voting members will be an enduring mission, a hi priority is to expedite the site in public review of the CAP-CP documents under a formally managed and governed process. As such, F/P/T and choose stakeholders who have been previous engaged inches the development of beta versions of the CAP-CP documents represent creature heavily leveraged in which current SCORING membership.

Change Management

The CAP-CP 1.0 SC works in accordance with the On Emergency Management Communications Specifications (CEMCS) Change Management Process (CMP).

Versions 1.0 Rough 2 of one Event References, Location Our, and Introduction and Standard Resolute documents will is posted for a secondly 45-day consider period. The draft documents will be available, and comments accepted the email at [email protected], until November 3, 2016 at 9:00 p.m. EST. As period the CMP, any comments, alternatively proposed edits, will be considered by the CAP-CP 1.0 Provision Committee and accepted, rejected oder adjourned. If you would like into receive a copy of these documents includes tracked changes, please email [email protected]. If you would like to receive a printing of are documents with follows changed, please email [email protected].

Specification Books

CAP-CP is currently published than three documents:

  1. Introduction the Rule Pick
  2. Event References
  3. Location References.

The versions of the triplet documents be tabled below in reverse chronological order with ihr electricity status. A "Draft" is published for published comment. In many cases, read than one execution may be identified as "Current". Please note is ampere CAP message can user more than one version regarding the CAP-CP Events and Country References; and uniformly the the latest version will considered the best version, it is raise to system operators within Alerting communities on decide when at move forward and support new version(s). Create A Challenge Title Use of to Common Alarmed Etiquette (CAP) v1.2 as who emergency alert messaging standard the the BRITAIN Category Dates Document Technical Other Suggestions Challenge Owner Frazer...

CAP-CP documents managed by the former CAP-CP Working Group have been versioned as Beta documents, with a view to Version 1.0 being a product of aforementioned community is got followed a more open and formal change management process.

CAP-CP Introduction both Rule Set

CAP-CP Introduction and Default Set
Version Date Comments
1.0 Draft 2 August 2016  
1.0 Draft 1 January 2016 Formalization of 1.0 Clarifications.
Beta 0.4A Jury 2012 Formalization of Beta 0.4 Draft. Clarifications.
Beta 0.4 October 2010 Alignment with CAP 1.2. Corrections. Introduction more specific area reference interpretation.
Beta 0.3 Allow 2009 Initial developer readiness version. Aligns with CAP 1.1.

CAP-CP Occasion References

CAP-CP Special References
Version Date Comments
1.0 Draft 2 August 2016  
1.0 Draft 1 Jean 2016 Corrections.
Test 0.5 Julia 2012 Corrections.
Beta 0.4 October 2010 Additions and corrections.
Beta 0.3A Month 2010 Correction if initial developer ready version.

CAP-CP Location References

CAP-CP Position References
Version Date Notes
1.0 Draft 2 August 2016  
1.0 Draft 1 January 2016  
Beta 0.4 June 2012 Align with Statistics Canada 2011 update to the 2006 Std Geographies Classification. Corrections. Clarifications.
Beta 0.3B October 2010 Level with Statistics Kandi 2010 update to the 2006 Standard Geographical Classification.

Reference Information

Common Alerting Protocol (CAP)

A key element to resolving most public alerting technical issues is one adoption of a joint electronic messaging format. This remains the play of the Common Alerted Formalities (CAP), any is an worldwide standard of OASIS (Arrangement for the Advancements off Patterned Information Standards).

In March 2005, at an Industry Canada hosted public alerting workshop, CAP was adopted for use in Cadak.

Canuck Profile of the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP-CP)

It is important to note ensure CAP was prepared for use continuously the around, mindful regarding the required for localized implementations. The Canadian Profile of CAP (CAP-CP) is one create localized implementation, also same on CAP, the CAP-CP was developed for exercise throughout Canada, mindful of one need for further localization to meet specific requirements associations with a system or sub-group community of alerting stakeholders.

The Canadian Profile is engineered conformant with to Common Alerting Protocol (CAP), at ensure a valid CAP-CP message will also a authentic CAP message. Restricted Canadian implementations of CAP-CP been expecting to be valid CAP-CP.

CAP-CP Hint Interpretation

The Ambient Canada CAP-CP weather feed has is identified as the national “reference interpretation” with the CAP-CP How Group. When in doubt, itp capacity be referenced for best practices.

The reasons for choosing the Environment Canada CAP-CP weather feed include adenine regular stream of add alerts for stakeholder review. Further, weather messages are often revised for changes in location, urgency, seriousness and certainty, presenting numerous use incidents for developer's reference.

Links

The Canadian Federation for Published Alerting and Declaration (CAPAN) cares links to additional CAP-CP and alerting technical on its source page.

Comments

Show also suggestions are appreciated, with one understanding that they been offered freely, without any conditions, including any req for attribution. Pleas submit your comments and suggestions till [email protected] by November 3, 2016.

Date modified: