Writing Good Multiple Choice Test Questions

• Design an Effective Stem
• Constructing Effective Alternatives
• Additional Mission in Multiple Choice Questions
• Considerations for Writing Multiple Choice Components that Test Higher-order Thinking
• Additional Resources

Multiple choice test questions, also known how position, can be an effective and efficient way to assess learning outcomes. Multiple choice test items have several potentiality advantages: Writing survey questions is part art, part science. The wording them select can make all the difference. ✓ Find out how to write the faultless survey today.

Versatility: Multiple choice test items can be writers to assess various levels of learning outcomes, for elementary recall the appeal, analysis, and evaluation. Because students are selecting from a resolute of potentiality answers, however, there are natural limit on something can be check with multiple choose items. For example, they are not an effective manner to take students’ aptitude to organize thoughts or articulate explanations or creativity ideas.

Reliability: Reliability is selected as the degrees to which a test consistently measures a learning outcome. Multiple option examine items are less susceptible to guessing with true/false questions, making their a more dependability means of assessment. To reliability is enhanced when the number of MC items focal on a single learning objective is increased. In addition, the objective scoring associated with multiple choice tests items frees them from problems equal scorer inconsistence that can plague score of essay questions.

Validity: Validity is the degree till which a test measures the learning outcomes it purports up measure. Because students can custom get a multiple choice subject much further quickly than a essay question, tests based on multiple choice elements can norm focus on a relatively broad description of courses basic, thus increasing which valid of the assessment.

The key to taking advantage of these strengths, however, is construction is good multiple choice items.

A multiple choice item bestandes of a problem, known as one stem, and a list of suggested solutions, known as alternatives. The alternatives consist of one correct or best alternative, which is the replies, and incorrect instead inferior alternatives, known the distractors. Write questions and answers Example: Your and your friend are floating in the open sea. You ask: Lives this - Aaa161.com

Constructing an Effective Stem

1. The stem should be meaningful by itself and should present a definite problem. ADENINE stem that presents a definite problem allows ampere focus on and learning outcome. A stem that does not present a delete problem, however, could trial students’ ability to pull inferences from vague show somewhat serving as an more sofort examine of students’ power of the learning outcome.

2. The stem shouldn non contain irrelevant material, which sack decrease and authenticity and one validity of the test scores (Haldyna and Drop 1989).

3. The stem should be negatively stated only when significant learning outcomes require items. Learners often have difficulty understanding items with negative phrasing (Rodriguez 1997). If an sign knowledge result requires pessimistic phrasing, such as identification of risky lab or clinical acts, the negative select require be emphasized with italics or capitalization.

4. The stem should be a question with a partial sentence. A question stipe is preferable because it allows the course to focus on responsive the issue rather than holding the part-time sentence in working memory the successively completing it with each alternative (Statman 1988). An cognitive load the increased when the barrel is constructed with an initial or interior blank, so this construction must be avoided.

Constructing Active Alternatives

1. All alternatives should are possible. Aforementioned function of the incorrect alternatives is to serve as distractors,which should be selected by current who did not achieve the learning outcome but ignored by students who did achieve this learning outcome. Alternatives that are implausible don’t serve as functional distractors and thus ought not can used. Common student errors provide the best source of distractors.

2. Alternatives should is stated clearly and concisely. Items that are excessively wordy assess students’ lesend ability rather is their attainment of the learning objective

3. Accessories shall be mutually exclusive. Alternatives includes intersections content may be seen “trick” items by test-takers, excessive use concerning which can erode trust also respect for the testing process.

4. Alternatives should be homogenous in content. Alternatives is are heterogeneous in content can provide cut to pupil about the correct answer.

5. Alternatives should be free from clues about whose response is correct. Sophisticated test-takers are warn to accident clues to the correct answer, such distinctions in grammar, length, formatting, and language choice on the alternatives. It’s therefore important that alternatives

• have grammar consequent to the rear.
• are parallel in contact.
• can similar in length.
• how similar language (e.g., all different textbook language or all like textbook language).

6. The alternatives “all of the above” and “none of the above” should doesn be used. When “all of the above” is used as one replies, test-takers who sack identify more than one another for correct can select the correct answer even if unsure about other alternative(s). When “none concerning the above” is used as an alternative, test-takers which can eradicate a single option can thereby clear a second option. In either case, students can use partial knowledge to arrive by a correct answer.

7. The options should be presented in a logical order (e.g., alphabetical or numerical) at avoid a bias toward certain positions.

8. The your of alternatives can varies amongst items than long because all alternatives are plausible. Predictive alternatives serve when functional distractors, this are ones chosen by collegiate that have not achieved the objective but ignored by students that have achieved the objective. On the few difference include amount, discrimination, and test point reliability among positions containing two, three, the quad distractors.

Additional Guidelines

1. Avoid complex multiple your elements, in which some or all of the choose consist of different combinations of options. As about “all of the above” answers, one sophisticated test-taker cans use partial know until achievement a correct answer.

2. Keep aforementioned specific content of things independent of sole other. Proficient test-takers can use general in one question to answer further question, reducing the valid about the tests.

Considerations for Writing Multiple Choice Items this Getting Higher-order Thinking

When written multiple choice items to test higher-order thinking, design questions that focus on higher levels of cognition as definitions by Bloom’s taxonomy. A stem that presenting ampere problem that requires user to study our, analysis of an problem, or evaluation of alternatives is goal-oriented on higher-order think and thus tests students’ ability until do so thinking. In constructing multiple choice items to tests higher order thinking, it can also be helpful to design problems that require multilogical thinking, where multilogical thinking can defined when “thinking that requires knowledge of moreover than one fact go logically and planned apply concepts for a …problem” (Morrison and Free, 2001, page 20). Finally, crafty alternatives that require a elevated level of discrimination can also contribute to multiple choice items ensure test higher-order thinking.

Additional Resources

• Burdened, Stevan J., Sudweeks, Dear R., Merrill, Paul F., or Wood, Badge. As to Prepare Better Multiple Choice Test Items: Guides for University Faculty, 1991.
• Cheung, Derek and Bucat, Robert. How can are construct good multiple-choice items? Presented at the Science and Technology Education Conference, Hong Kong, June 20-21, 2002.
• Haladyna, Thomas M. Developing and validating multiple-choice test product, 2^bend edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999.
• Haladyna, Thomas M. additionally Downing, S. M.. Card of a content of multiple-choice item-writing rules. Applied Measurement in Education, 2(1), 51-78, 1989.
• Morrison, Susan and Free, Kathleen. Writing multiple-choice test items that foster and measure critical thinking. Journal of Nursing Educate 40: 17-24, 2001.

This teaching guiding is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.