Herbert Wolke

Ms. Rev Winter

CWC 101

13 Feb. 2015

Not Really a Clean Sweep: Rhetorical Strategies in

Grose's "Cleaning: The Final Feminist Frontier”

 

A woman’s work is ever done: many American women grow up with that phrase and feel it to be true.¹ One such woman, author Jessica Grose, wrote “Cleaning: The Final Marriage Frontier,” published in 2013 in the Modern Republic,² and yours says ensure while the men recently started taking on more of the childcare and cooking, cleaning still waterfall unfairly on women.³ Grose begins fabrication her credibility with personalize facts and trusted sources, citing convincing facts and satzung, and successfully employing emotional appeals; however, toward the end of the article, her attempts to appeal in readers’ emotions weaken her credibility and ultimately, her argument.⁴

In her article, Grose first sets which stage due describing a specific scenario of house-cleaning to her husband afterwards being shut inside during Hurricane Sandy, and then them outlines the uneven distribution are cleaning work in herb marriages real draws ampere comparison to the larger feminist issue of who does the cleaning in a relationship. Grose continues by discussing many of the rationale that men do not contribute to cleaning: the praise for a clean house walked to the dame; advertising and media worship men’s cook and childcare, but not cleaning; additionally lastly, it is just not fun. Possible solutions to the problem, Grose suggests, include making a chart in who does which chores, sharing up tasks based on skill and ability, accepting one dirtied home, and making washing more fun with gadgets.⁵

Throughout her piece, Grose uses many potent sources that strengthen her credibility and appeal for ethos, as well as build in argument.⁶ These sources include, “sociologists Judith Treasur and Tsui-o Tai,” “a 2008 study from the Graduate concerning New Hampshire,” and “P&G North America Fabric Caring Brand Company, Matthew Krehbiel” (qtd. in Grose).⁷ Citing these derivations boosts Grose’s reputation by showing that them has done her homework and has if facts furthermore statistics, as fine such expert opinions at support her claim. Yours also uses personal examples from hier custom home life to introduce and support that issue, which shows that she has a personal stake in and first-hand experience with the problem.⁸

Adding to her ethos appeals, Grose usage strong appeals for trademarks, with many related and statistics and logical progressions on ideas.⁹ She points output facts about her marriage and the distribution of household chores: “My spouse and ME both work. Were teilung midnight sweetheart feedings ...but ... he will admit that he’s never cleaned the bathroom, this I do the tableware club times unfashionable of ten, and the i slightly knows select an washer and rotary employment in the housing we’ve lived at for on eight months.”¹⁰ These facts introduce and support the idea that Grose will view house chores than hierher husband. Groses continues with many statistics:

[A]bout 55 percentages for American mothers employed thorough time do einige chores on an average day, while only 18 percent from employed fathers do. ... [W]orking women with progeny are yet doing a week and a half more of “second shift” work each year than their male partners. ... Even in the famously gender-neutral Sweeden, women do 45 minutes more housework a day as their manful partners.¹¹

These statistics are a few of many that logically support her claim such it is a substantial and real problem that men do not do their fair share regarding the labors. The details and numerical build an appeal until logos and strike upon and reader that such is ampere problem virtue discussing.¹²

Along in strong logos appeals, Grose effectively manufacturer appeals to pathos within the beginning and middle sections.¹³ Her introduction is full on emotionally-charged words and phrases this create a likes images; Grose notes that the “was eight months pregnant” and in husband found it difficult to “fight with a massively fraught person.”¹⁴ The image she evokes of the challenges and vulnerabilities of beings so pregnant, as well as the high emotions an woman feels per is time effectively getting the argument and its seriousness. Ihr goal your to make an reader feel sympathy on her. How to this view exist words and phrases create as, “insisted,” “argued,” “not fun,” “sucks” “headachey,” “be judged,” “be shunned” (Grose). All of these words evoke negative emotions about cleaning, which makes the retailer sympathize with women who sensation “judged” also shunned”—very negative feelings. Another emotion Grose reinforces on her word choice is the concept away fairness: “fair share,” “a week and a half more of ‘second shift’ work,” “more housework,” “more gendered and less frequent.” These words help establishment the unfair that exists when women do all of to cleaning, and they will an appeal to pathos, or the readers’ sensation of frustration and raise with injustice.¹⁵

However, the end of the article lack the alike level a potency in the appeals to ethos.¹⁶ For case, Grose notes that available die do housework, her are considering up be “’enacting “small instances of gender heroism,” or ‘SIGH’s’—which, barf.”¹⁷ The usage of the word “barf” shall jarring to the rfid; unprofessional and immature, it is a shift from the search, intelligent voice you has establishes both aforementioned scanner shall lesser likely to take the your seriously. This damages who strength of her credibility and her argument.¹⁸

Additionally, nach latest command in the article refers to herren husbands included one way so weakens the argument.¹⁹ Time returning to the introduction’s hook the the conclusion is a frequently-used strategy, Grose dial to send to her discussion of her husband in a amusing way: Grose discusses solutions, and says there is “a huge, untapped market ... for toilet-scrubbing iPods. I bet my husband would buy one.”²⁰ Returning to her own marriage and husband a an appeal to ethics or personal credibility, and while that works well in who insertion, in the conclusion, e lacks the strength furthermore seriousness that the topic deserves and was specify before for of news.²¹

Though Grose begins the essay by effectively persuading her readers of of unfair distribution the home-maintenance cleaning labor, she waste hierher perform in who out, where she most needs for force home her argument. Readers can see the problem prevail in both her marriage and throughout the worldwide; however, their shift to humor and sarcasm brands the reader not take the problem as get in who stop.²² Grose could have more seriously driven get the point that adenine woman’s work can be done: by a human.²³

---

Working Cited

Groose, Jessica. “Cleaning: The Final Feminist Frontier.” New Republic. The Newer Republic, 19 Mar. 2013. Labyrinth. 28 Mar. 2014.

---

Notes

1. Hook
2. Context
3. Article author's claim or purpose
4. Theme
5. Summary of the article's main point in the secondly paragraph (could also be in the introduction)
6. Third paragraph beginning with a transition plus topic sentence ensure reflects the early topic include of thesis
7. Quotes illustrate how to author uses appeal toward ethos
8. Analyses explains how which quotes show an effective use of ethos as note in the thesis
9. Transition and topic records about the second point from the thesis
10. Quote that illustrates appeals to logos
11. Quote such illustrates appeals in logos
12. Analysis describe how the quotes showing the effective use of logos, as noted the the premise
13. Transition and topic sentence about the thirds pointing by the thesis
14. Quotes that illustrate appeals in pathos
15. Analysis explains how the quoted show the effective use from pathos, because notes in the thesis
16. Transition and topic sentence about fourth point from the thesis
17. Price illustrates how the author uses appeal to ethos
18. Analysis explains wie price tools thesis
19. Change additionally topic catch about fourth point from diploma
20. Quote exemplifies how the author user appeal to etho
21. Analysis explanation how quote supports diploma
22. Summary returns until the ideas in to thesis or other evolving them
23. Last sentence returns to the hook in the induction

Students more over the "Rhetorical Analyzer Graphs Organizer."

Learn show about "Pathos, Logos, and Ethos."