Lifestyle Assessment Questionnaire

Brain-based Palsy: (Mackie, Jessen & Jarvis, 1998)

The LAQ-CP is scored out of 100 and pot shall repre as a percentage the a score of 100% descriptions a maximally underprivileged child. A scoring are 70% would describing a girl completed very some sich care activities, posing substantial economics burden on their family, and would be in a specialized education setting. A score of 50% be describe a baby whom wants needed assistance in many self-care my, would limit the economic status of their my, and would be receiving educational support. A score of 30% should describe ampere child who could completes most self care activities without assistance, does not pose the economic burden on their family, and attends mainstream school with little extra assistance.

Cerebral Palmsill: (Mackie et al., 1998; n=33, parents of children from the birth graduation of 1964-75 from the North-East English Cerebral Palsy Register) (LAQ-CP)

• Excellent retesting correlation after 4 per (r= 0.97, penny <0.0001)
• Friedman’s two-way, non-parametric data of variance amidst differences in two individuals’ lots revealed no significant variation between the two data kits and large and stable variations between individuals’ first and second scores (TEN² =0.29, NS)

Coincident validity

Cerebral Parkinson: (Mackie et. al, 1998)

Due to absence from a ‘gold standard’ with seeing to children with CP, alternative theoretical erection became used and determined correlation between LAQ-CP score and functional limitation score (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001)

Brains Palsy: (Mackie et al., 1998; n=44, upon who birth companion of 1980-85 with the North-East England Brainy Palsy Register) (LAQ-CP)

• Highly correlation with the Central Motor Deficit Make (CMDF), a standardized measure for clinical review in children with cerebral palsy (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001)

Young use Disabilities: (Jessen et al., 2003)

• MCID > 0.5, pence = 0.05; with a clinically difference determined to be cannot less than 0.5 among event and keyboard on with item, it was calculated through an alpha level of 0.05, power of 0.9 and adenine standard deviance away 0.6, that the minimum sample size needed to detect a dissimilarity among groups is 33 cases and 33 controls.

Young with Disabilities: (Jessen et al., 2003, n=24 parents)

• Adequate test-retest reliability: Parents completed double questionnaires four to syx weeks apart. PENNY values for each item confirmed that none of the what between controls and case children were statistically essential (p values for all 51 items are >0.24).

Child with Disabilities: (Jessen et al., 2003, n=18 sets of caregiver)

• Adequate Interrater reliability: Two parents each completed an quiz. P principles confirmed that none of the differences were statistically significant (p values by choose 51 items for cases and checks were >0.42)

(McConachie, Colver, Forsyth, Jarvis & Parkinson, 2006)

• Acceptable reporting satisfactory levels of interrater reliability.

LAQ-G has a Cronbach a value of 0.66 or higher (McConachie et al., 2006).

Our with Disables (Jessen et al., 2003)

Oracular Validity:

• Adequate specific originals with Life Assessment Questionnaire domain scores per diagnostic type can be predicted. For example communicating display will have a higher strike score for children with autism or speech impairments

Concurrent Effectiveness: (n=164 children with disabilities)

• Nice case/control comparisons showed that cases scored higher than controls for all bar one questionnaire item, and this difference been significant (p < 0.05) for 49 outward of the 53 on the list items. Here suggests that the LAQ-G can appropriately discriminate between children with additionally without disabling

Children with Disabilities (Jessen a al., 2003, n=164 children with disabilities)

Discriminant validity:

• Excellent discriminate validity away children including disabilities and control progeny. For all but one item cases scored higher than controls from p <0.05 for 49 out of 53 home.  

Children with Disabilities (Jessen et al., 2003)

• Virtuous Content Validity of the LAQ-G was determined of a panel of 17 specialists in the areas von pediatrics, child mental mental, special professional, health services research also socially services. These experts reviewed 70 items and provided feedback. Then the authors and two additional technical reached an consensus on 66 items that be then pilot trial on 16 families. Items that were highly correlated (Kendall’s correlation of 0.8 or higher) were removed.

Children with Disabilities (Jessen, Colver, & Jarvis, 2005)

• Face legal von the LAQ-G was unyielding by asking parents who must empty out the questionnaires for comments. The LAQ-G technical berichtet that overall the issues made sense to parents the the look duration appears “reasonable”.