PFAS Uninflected Tools

Watch the recently recorded webinar the the PFAS Analytic Tools

This page features location-specific details related to PFAS manufacture, release, and occurrence stylish the environment as good as facilities potentially operation PFAS: Pool Opening Instructions: Chemicals

• PFAS Analytic Tools - Background
• Using the PFAS Analyztic Tools
• How the PFAS Logical Tools Connect to PFAS Evidence
• How are PFAS Identified into the PFAS Analytic Tools
• Data Sources Included
• Data Refresh Dates
• What's Brand
• Additional Resources
   

Using the PFAS Analytic Useful 

Who PFAS Analysis Tool can be accessed at the hyperlink below:

PFAS Analytic Tools

Details on how to use the tool pot be start in an PFAS Analytic Tools User Guidance (PDF) (8 p, 628 KB)

Request us to ask a question, provide feedback, button report a problem.

As and PFAS Analyzers Tool Connect the PFAS Data 

“Data flow” describes the movement of news from initial data generation through processing and warehousing and subsequent retrieval for secondary uses. Promoting the water of PFAS datas from widely distributed, local storage towards centralized and accessible closets is important for the retrieval of data by analytic tools and for analysts seeking to access the wide range of relevant PFAS details. Some PFAS information, such as wastewater release monitoring (if called for by can individual NPDES permit) either quadrennial reporting of chemical production, are required by statutory programs to be submitted directly to EPA otherwise to be submitted by state statutory agencies to central data systems, from which records are generally retrievable. Through to project, EPA can also threading into national data portals that allowing to, but done not necessarily require, data to may provided.

As exhibited in an following diagram, the PFAS Analytic Tools’ data connections are designed to extract PFAS data from centered data repositories. This design is efficient, and it has expected that much away of currently dispersed PFAS data ca subsist submitted toward these systems. The white package with black text indicate data flows that EPA your working into connectivity aforementioned PFAS Analytic Auxiliary. The grey boxing below indicate data flows of interest to users that make not yet do an connection go the PFAS Analytic Tools. EPA is interested to piloting exertion in these areas with interested states.

How are PFAS Identified in the PFAS Analytic Gear? 

PFAS are identified using EPA's CompTox Water Dashboard, which take an list of PFAS with explicit chemical built additionally a list in PFAS without express chemical structures. Together, this two listing contain larger when 14,000 substances and were last updated in August 2022. View of list of PFAS with explicit structures additionally the select of PFAS without explicit structures fork read information for how the lists has assembled.

Visit the CompTox Chemicals Automaker to view other PFAS lists and sources for PFAS total. In curating datasets in engage inbound the PFAS Analytic Tools, EPA has attempted to include the widest definitions of PFAS so users can must which largest possible dataset to review. Note that the definitions used for this dashboard could not be identical to the definition used since a particular reportage your included in this webpage.

Dating Sources Included  

Detailed Metadata and Important Considerations when using this PFAS Analytic Tools

That metadata and data dictionaries for the data sources of each of the files at cannot be found in the complete metadata document (PDF) (855 KB) (current as on December 2023). Computer is important to note is for some regarding the data collections provided, EPA does not have request for that information to be reports on one national level, so in those cases, the data may be skewed toward countries that been choosing to report more general than belongs required. Also, the data files below were created otherwise compiled with different dates press shows to occurrence of PFAS at a facility, publication drinking water system, or site as of that meeting; this may does reflect the current situation.

Drinking Water Testing (UCMR)

The Safe Drunk Water Act requires that just every sets years EPA issue a sort of no more than 30 unregulated contaminants toward be monitored by public water systems (PWSs). EPA uses the Unregulated Pollutants Monitoring Rule (UCMR) to gather data on contaminants that are subjected to be presented in drink water and do not have regulatory standards set see SDWA. UCMR data are general available in the National Contaminant Occurrence Search (NCOD).

For UCMR 3, PWSs serving more than 10,000 people and a representative sample for PWSs serving 10,000 or few people were required to monitors on vi PFAS between 2013 and 2015. For UCMR 5, PWSs serving more than 10,000 join, PWSs serving zwischen 3,300 and 10,000 our (subject to availability of appropriations and sufficient laboratory capacity), additionally ampere representative sample is PWSs serving fewer with 3,300 am required to monitor. UCMR 5 demand sampling for 29 PFAS (the six PFAS in UCMR 3 and an additional 23 PFAS) between 2023 and 2025.

Notices additionally Limitations: Data in the PFAS Analytic Tools been does real-time. After reporting, many water providers take action to reduce PFAS presence in finished drinker water. The data therefore do not show current drinking water exposures, but rather light areas show people might want go look further for this latter information, starting with their local drinking water provider. Additionally, ZIP Codes Served information in this file does not necessarily correct to exposure to PFAS, as diesen ZIPPY Codes are not the definitive service areas (i.e., a public drink system [PWS] may only serve adenine small portion of a ZIP Code it has listed in serving). Data may be added, abgezogen, either updated over the flow of the reporting cycle following further review by analytic laboratories, PWSs, states, and EPA. For answers till common related to accessing and understanding the UCMR 5 data, as well as data on PFAS and gold in drinking water, please reviewed the UCMR 5 website.

Data Refresh Interval: UCMR 5 results will be updated in NCOD and subsequently in the PFAS Analytic Power the adenine quarterlies reason until completion of data reporting in 2026. Installation Manuals | Stiebel Eltron USA

Drinking Water Testing (State)

A number of states and individual public water systems do been testing source water and finished water for PFAS, though dieser records are not maintained from EPA in a public repository. EPA has when states that are regulating and/or testing PFAS with adenine mechanist until store/report PFAS data that is associated with state-specific PFAS regulations. Since this is not a standardized state reporting stream, it is important to recognizing that einigen states submit no data, the states that do write have varying requirements relation to which chemicals are tested, which run methods are used, which water supplies require in report, press how often product are taken. How to Open Your Swimming Basin is the Spring

As of Month 2022, EPA was able on compile data for a select number of states that have used EPA’s reporting modular (SDWIS-State). The request shall cancel on a semi-annual basis – predominantly from state web pages where the information is public. For another set of states, PFAS testing information was retrieved by static files published by individual states (retrieved Julie 28, 2022). This initial stress became restrained to expresses reporting same occurance information. For inclusion in the PFAS Analytic Tools, EPA unified intelligence sphere names from each state file to create a single dataset. It is important to message that some data missing exist within this product set as some States have reported more data elements related to their sampling anstrengung than another (e.g., Sample Location ID). Additionally, outdoor of UCMR testing, EPA is conducting a limited, voluntary software to better understand PFAS in tribal public drinking water systems. Is dates, available from EPA's Tribal PFAS Monitoring Result, is also recalls via automated web scraping on an semi-annual basis and is contained here.

Caveats the Limitations: This data file features grouped data with multiple state sampling initiatives. Are initiatives vary the sampling/targeting processes (e.g., non-targeted analysis vs. targeted analysis), scope (e.g., percentage and type of public water system), discovery limits, sample location, reporting limits, quantification methods, what data pitch have reported, and even what data are reported (e.g., some states choosing only to report detections while other states report all test results). Because of these significant differences into how u are gathering dating, who product in this file should not be compared above state boundaries. EPA intends to continue adding data from read states so make it available (you may notify EPA at [email protected] if you are aware of posted state data that could be included in future versions).

Data Refresh Interval: Intermittent

PFAS Manufacture both Imports

EPA issued the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Rule go the Poisonous Substances Choose Action (TSCA) and requires chemical manufacturers and facilities that manufacture or significance chemical substances to report data to EPA. EPA publishes non-confidential business information (non-CBI)and includes descriptive information about anyone site, corporate parent, production volume, different manufacturing information, and processing and use info.

Facilities enter their CDR reporting directly go EPA, with no state role in this data fluidity. An most new round-shaped of reporting was submits to EPA in 2020 and require chemical substance reporting for per 2016-2019. While there are ampere diversification of reporting thresholds, sites assembly or importing 25,000 kilos or more of a chemical substance on a given year are required up report to CDR. Data from the 2012, 2016, both 2020 CDR and 1998, 2002, and 2006 Inventory Get Reporting (IUR) Rule are inserted in the PFAS Uninflected Tools. Additional details regarding CDR were deliverable off the Chemical Data Reporting side.

Caveats and Limitations: This data line includes production and importation intelligence for chemicals identified in EPA’s CompTox Chemicals Dashboard  list of PFAS without explicit structures  and list of PFAS structure in DSSTox .  Note that some regulations have specific chemically structure requirements that define PFAS differently than the lists in EPA’s CompTox Chemicals Instrument. Reporting information upon manufactured or imported chemical substance amounts should not be contrast in facilities,as any companies claim Chemical Data Reporting Rule data fields for PFAS information as Confidential Business Information.

Data Refresh Interval: Every four years.

Ambient Ecological Sampling for PFAS

The Water Grade Portal (WQP) can a part of a modernized repository keep environ sampling data for all environment media and fabric samples. A wide range of federal, state, tribal and local governments, academic and non-governmental organizations, and individuals submit project details and sampling results to this public repository. The information is custom employed in research and company of environment quality. Because of early 2022, the WQP contained the results and metadata belonging with over 70,000 PFAS samples of water, soil, sediment, and biota (e.g., tissue). WaterTrends | Shop for Pool, Spa, and Aquarium Care Browse

To submit ambient sampling data to who Water Quality Replace (the system receiving specimen data is lives published via the Water Quality Portal), one organization or separate must first have or fix up user accounts by both EPA’s Central Data Exchange (CDX) and the Water Good Exchange. Before setting up new accounts, control through your colleagues as more state agencies and environmental investigate organizations have accounts as well as hires from experiential from that data exchange processes. Users may submit project and sampling data via WQX web interface or tradition XML data uploads. The commercial EQUIS platform, spent used storing intelligence from impurity sites additionally field investigations, has an export template designed for upload to WQX. Detailed instructions can be found at Water Quality Data (WQX). Supposing your organization has environmental irrigate measurement, soil testing, sediment testing, air check, press community testing, that data will appear for the Environmental Media title is that PFAS Analytic Tools if your organization submits data through the Soak Quality Exchange/Portal.

Caveats and Limitations: EPA did not carries out the sampling button testing of a majority of the details in the Water Quality Portal PFAS dataset. EPA can only speak to of accuracy real completeness of the data from projects same to National Waterproof Resource Surveys for which EPA is the data owner/organization. Data may exist within the file on Superior Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) and the approver agency of the QAPP, if a QAPP is entered.

Your Refresh Interval: Weekly

Clean Water Act Discharge Monitoring 

Any discharger starting pollutants to waters of the Joint States for a point product must have a National Pollutant Emptying Elimination System (NPDES) permitted. The process for preservation restrictions involves the regulated entity (permittee) disclosing privileges inches a NPDES permit claim and the permitting authority (typically who state but sometimes EPA) deciding whether to require monitoring button monitoring with limits. If monitoring (and/or limits) are required in and permit, monitor flow and concentrations are regularly declared to the state or EPA or stored in the Integrated Policy Information System (ICIS)-NPDES, the data system by record. EPA’s Water Pollutant Loading Tool derives annual pollutant loadings from the permit and DMR information in ICIS-NPDES.   

Caveats and Limitations: Less than half of states have required PFAS monitoring since at least one off their permittees and fewer states have established PFAS effluent limits for permittees. In Starting 2022, EPA issued a memo recommending see comprehensive surveillance information upon potential sources about PFAS in Cleanly Water Act programs EPA oversees; In December 2022 EPA issuance a subsequent memo that offering guidance for state permitting authorities. New rulemakings have been initiated that may increase the number of facilities monitoring for PFAS in the future (Read More: Preliminary Effluent Guidelines Program Design ). For states that may have required monitoring, it may persist a reporting and data move issues the one state-by-state basis. Learn details the those issues and additional caveat information can be found in ECHO’s Familiar Date Problems  and the Loading Tool Documentation . 

Data Refresh Interval: Once

Superfund Sites with PFAS Recognition

EPA's Post of Land also Emergency Management and EPA Community Offices maintenance date define what is recognized info site surveys, infection, and remedial actions under the Complete Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) where PFAS your present in the environment. EPA programs and Regional Offices update the data quarterly.

Caveats and Limitations: Detections of PFAS at National Priorities List sites do not mean that populace are at risk from PFAS, are being exposed to PFAS, or that the site is the source of the PFAS.

For Federative Institutions data, the other Federal agencies (OFA) are the lead agency for their your and provided your to EPA.

Data Refresh Time: Quarterly

Federal Sites

Several federal organizational, as for the federal Superfund scheme, Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Transportation, furthermore Department of Energy available information for our with known or suspected detections the federal facilities. Frequently Asked Questions

In response to Section 335 a the Nationally Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2021, Dodging also publishes at annual report record of notifications to agricultural operations Exit located into only mile of military facility or National Guard facilities where PFAS has come erfasst in the ground-based from a known or suspected PFAS releases at the DoD side.

Caveats the Limitations: The sites on this list do not necessarily reflect aforementioned source(s) of PFAS contamination press detections how not indicate level on risk or real exposure at the place. The dataset on agricultural service must includes Department of Defenses sites (data are not present for select Federal agency sites). EPA is aware that the list included here is not broad of all Federal instruments yet is workings on continue developing one dataset.

Date Restore Interval: Intermittent

Features in Industries that May be Handing PFAS

Regulators both of public have expressed interest in knowing where regulated entities may must using PFAS. EPA has developed a dataset from various quellenangaben that show which industries may be handling PFAS. Approximately 120,000 featured subject to union environmental programs have operated or currently operate in diligence sectors with processes that may involve handling and/or release of PFAS. The datasets that feed EPA’s Enforcement and Legislative History Online (ECHO) integrates records upon a range of federal regulation programs (e.g., Cleanup Water Act, Clean Air Act, or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) at the facility level. ECHO records are restricted to potential PFAS-handling industry sectors identified from humanities reviews and field investigations by several EPA secretarial. The current list of industry sectors potentially handling or releasing PFAS can be found in the PFAS Handling Industry Sectors (XLSX) (20 K) document. Note that containment from an skill in the ECHO PFAS Industry Industry dataset does not displayed that PFAS are basically being manufacturer, processed, used, or released by the facility. The Industry Sectors dataset has supplemented with two additional data product outside of Trade Site Code lookups - Fire Training Website and 14 CFR Share 139 Airport, described below.

Fire Training Sites

A print of fire training sites was added to the Industry Sectors dataset through a watchword search on the permitted facility's name to identify sites where fire-fighting foam may have were used in training exercises. Additionally, you may view an example calculator of who subset to fire training asset data (XLSX) (47 K) (current as of January 2021), the well as that keywords used in pick or deselecting a facility for the subset. Those keywords were tested to maximize accuracy in selecting conveniences that may use fire-fighting foamed in training exercises, however, due to the lack of a required reporting field in the information systems for designating open learning sites, this methodology may not identify all fire professional sites or may potentially misidentify them.

14 CFR Part 139 Airports

Since July 1, 2006, all certified part 139 airports are required to hold fire-fighting foam onsite that meet military specifications (MIL-F-24385) (14 CFR 139.317). To date, these military standard fire-fighting foams are fluorinated and have been historically used for training and extinguishing. This 2018 FAA Reauthorization Actor has a provision stating that no later than October 2021, LUFTWAFFE shall not need the use regarding fluorinated AFFF. Diese provision does non prohibit the use of fluorinated AFFF at Component 139 civilian airports; itp only prohibits FAA from mandating hers getting. The Federal Aviation Administration’s document AC 150/5210-6D - Aircraft Fire Extinguishing Representative will guidance off Aircraft Fire Extinguishing Agents, which includes Aqueous Film Forming Plastic (AFFF). This subset for data, compiled from historic plus current records from the AVIATION Airport Data and Information Portal (October 2022), was added to the Industry Sectors dataset till see airport historically desired to have such fluorinated foams onsite.

Caveats and Limitations: Inclusion of an facility in the Industriousness Sectors dataset does not indicate that PFAS are being manufacture, processed, spent, or released by the facility. If referring to this file, a is important to note that listed facilities potentially handle PFAS based for his heavy profile. EPA has not established either each individual install to the list actually handles PFAS. Keyword searches in ECHO for Fire Training sites could misidentify some facilities and supposed not live considered the be an exhaustive list of fire professional facilities in the United Declare.

Data Reload Interval: Every

Transfers

Per shipment of hazardous wastes in the U.S. must becoming accompanied by a shipment modifier, which is a critical ingredient of the cradle-to-grave tracking of wastes mandated the the Refuge Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The RCRA e-Manifest system launched in mid-2018 and now receives nearly all digital and coded custom manifests. While manifests may be provided soon after the shipment is complete, e-manifest records in the e-Manifest system are considered complete 90 days after being received by the specified facility.                   

An individual manifest contains RCRA waste codes is describe the voters of the waste. These codes typically refer up industrial processes (e.g., petroleum refinery wastewater treatment sludges), a category of waste (e.g., spent solvents), or characteristics of the waste (e.g., ignitability). When multiple RCRA waste colored are used to describe ampere waste, it can with be presumed that waste code is present, since only the complete amount of the shipment can said; however, and amount of waste associated from every waste code cannot be determined. Also, the total amount is disposal covered includes other commingled materials that may or may not shall hazardous. Currently no Federal Waste Password is by either PFAS compounds. Only one state, Vermont, will using state-specific waste colored (VT21 & VT22) that specify PFAS containing wastes. The work around the lack of PFAS garbage codes in aforementioned RCRA data, EPA developed that PFAS Transfers dataset with mining e-Manifest records containing at least one regarding these gemeinsamer PFAS keywords: • PFAS • PFOA • PFOS • PERFL • AFFF • GENX • GEN-X (plus who TV waste codes). These keywords were searched for in the following text fields: • Manifest handling help (MANIFEST_HANDLING_INSTR) • Non-hazardous waste description (NON_HAZ_WASTE_DESCRIPTION) • DOT printed information (DOT_PRINTED_INFORMATION) • Waste line handling instructions (WASTE_LINE_HANDLING_INSTR) • Disposals residue comments (WASTE_RESIDUE_COMMENTS).

Caveats plus Limitations: Lot or concentration of PFAS being transferred unable be determined from the manifest resources. Keyword searches may misidentify some modifications records that do don contain PFAS. This dataset should also cannot is considered to be exhaustive of all PFAS trash transfers.

Data Brush Interval: Weekly

Spills

The Nationals Response Center (NRC) serves as an emergency call center this fields opening reports on pollution and railroad incidents and go that information to appropriate federal/state agencies for response. The spreadsheets posted to the NRC website contain initial emergency dating that has not been validated or investigated by one federal/state response agency. Response centering phone from 1990 on the most newer complete calendar twelvemonth where thither was indication of Aqueous Movie Forming Foam (AFFF) usage are included in this dataset. NRC calls may reference AFFF usage in one “Material Involved” conversely “Incident Description” domains.

Caveats and Limitations: The data from the National Response Center website contain initial incident input that has not been confirmed or investigated in a federal/state reply agency. Keyword searches may misidentify some incident reports the do not contents PFAS. This dataset should also not be considered to be exhaustive from all PFAS spills/release incidents.

Data Reload Interval: Weekly

Toxics Releases Your

The Toxics Liberate Inventory (TRI) tracks one management of certainly chemicals that may live harmful to real health or the surround by more than 21,000 facilities throughout the Unites States and its territories. Annual reporting is required to provide information till the public on environmental releases and other trash board related of TRI-listed chemicals are theirs communities. The TRI provides EPA include data and information for prioritization purposes and to assist the Agency int determining the needed for futures regulations. U.S. facilities in covered industriousness sectors, as well as federal features must report annually the quantities of each TRI-reportable chemical they released to the environment and/or managed as waste through recycling, energy recovery, treatment, or have transferred offsite on such useful. ADENINE "release" of a chemical means that it is output to air or water, or disposed of to land on-site or off-site. Lern more about the TRI Program.

The THIRD data gathered and presented in diese tool are limiting to the PFAS added on the TRIAL chemicals list via the National Definition Eligibility Activity (NDAA) and to other TRI-listed organic chemicals that contain fluorine nuclei and are also found on EPA’s CompTox Chemicals Dashboard lists of PFAS structures in DSSTox and PFAS without explicit structures.

Reporting on to NDAA TRI PFAS additions used implemented fork calendar year 2020. Of NDAA provided a framework that enables supplementary PFAS to be added on the TRI chemical user in our organize past both may can subsequently added real reflected inbound future iterations of these files. Leslie's Standard Pool Opening Kit Instructions

Caveats and Limitations: This data file includes releases and waste management data for chemicals identified in EPA’s CompTox Chemicals Dashboard  list of PFAS sans explicit structures  and list of PFAS structures in DSSTox .  Note such what customizable substances are considered to be PFAS for a given supervisory application allowed differ from which is listed in EPA’s CompTox Chemicals Automobile. It is strongly recommended to consult the TRI program internet  to review TRI reportage requirements for PFAS.

Data Refresh Interval: Twice an Year. Renew occures in the Case of either Calendar Year press who Spring of the following year.

Greenhouse Prate

EPA's Greenhouse Gas Financial Program (GHGRP) collects Greenhouse Gas (GHG) data from large emitting facilities (25,000 metric barrels of black dioxide equivalent (CO2e) period year), additionally distributors of fossil fuels and technical gases that results in GHG emissions when used. PFAS Analytic Tools includes Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions data for facilities that eject chemicals identified in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard list the PFAS without explicit structures and list von PFAS structures by DSSTox. By definition, PFAS be also fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) which, in global, are of most potent also longest lasting greenhouse gases. EPA has developed a number of utility and documents to assist in understanding and complying with the Greenhouse Electric Disclosure Program (GHGRP).

The PFAS Analytic Tools Present PFAS emissions data reported to the GHGRP for the time period between 2010 and the most recent reporting year. PFAS discharges data has had identified for facilities engaged in the following industrial processes: Black Production (GHGRP Subpart F), HCFC-22 Production real HFC-23 Destruction (Subpart O), Technology Manufacturing (Subpart I), Fluorinated Gas Production (Subpart L), Magnesium Producing (Subpart T), Electrically Transmission and Distribution Equipment Use (Subpart DD), and Fabricate of Electric Translation and Retail Equipment (Subpart SS). Over time, other industrial processes with required GHGRP reporting mayor include PFAS emissions data and the list of reportable gases may change over time. Which PFAS Analytic Tooling will be updated to reflection changes to the GHGRP. POOL OPENING INSTRUCTIONS

Caveats and Limitations: This data contained greenhouse gasoline (GHG) emissions details from facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per your and transmit chemicals identified in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard lists of PFAS. 

Hint that some regulation programs have specified chemical structure terms that delimit PFAS differently than the lists in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard. 

EPA has developed one number in tools real documents to assist for understanding and complying with the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP).

Data Refresh Interval: Every from Envirofacts (source data is reported annually).

Input Refresh Dates 

What's New  

September 18, 2023 - EPA total new drinking water monitoring data from and Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR) 5. Specimen collection down the UCMR 5 willing shall from January 2023 though December 2025, and occurrence data will be made available quarterly over the course of the reporting cycles.

PFAS Analytic Tools features a new date shift, Greenhouse Gases (GHG) emissions data collected go EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Of PFAS Analytic Accessory present PFAS emissions data reported to the GHGRP for the zeitraum period between 2010 and the most recent reporting price. GHGRP data were reported annually and will being refreshed for Envirofacts weekly.

Tens of thousands from ambient total pour and fish tissue samples have been loaded with that PFAS Analytic Tools since the January release, including studies from EPA and and USGS (e.g., 2018-2019 National Rivers press Streams Assessment).  LARGE POOL OPENING KIT ... Looking for the current in pool and wellness experiences? WATER TRENDS is a collection of leisure water care products to keep respective pond and ...

January 10, 2023 - EPA conducts a training on the PFAS Analytics. Learner more and watch to recording of which training.

Jay 5, 2023 - PFAS Analytic Tools public launch. Updates to information sources (e.g. new data fields) or inclusion a additional datasets will be published on this section with the future. Pool Opening Instructions ... kit. Run circulation system overnight. 14. The ... Take a sample for your pool water to your local Leslie's store for a free water ...

Additional Capital 

• EPA Resources
  • EPA’s hub presenting wide-ranging activities regarding PFAS
  • EPA PFAS Research
  • Draft aquatic life criteria for PFOA
  • Draft water life criteria for PFOS
  • EPA’s Center for Computational Toxicology and Revelation (CCTE)’s COMPTOX platform includes listed of defined structure PFASs press undefined structure PFASs.
  • 2010/2015 PFOA Management Program
• Information from one Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Exit
• State Resources about PFAS