ACEP PSYCHE:

Headache

Critical Output in the Valuation and Betriebsleitung of Adults Patients Presenting to who Emergency Department The Acute Headache

Range on Application

This guideline is intended required physicians working in emergency departments those are evaluating nontraumatic patients with penetrating onset headache and nonfocal neurologic examination findings.

Inclusion Criteria

This guideline is intended required acute grownup nontraumatic headaches.

Exclusion Rating

This instruction belongs don intended required my include chronic headaches instead pediatric, pregnant, or trauma patients.


Industry offered in this policy have not intended to represents the alone electronic and management options that the emergency physician should considers. ACEP recognizes the importance of that individual physician’s judgment and patient preferences.

Critical Questions

  • To the grownup emergency sector patient presenting with peak heading, are there risk-stratification plans so trusted identify the what for emergent neuroimaging? In 2007, the American College of Emergency Doctor (ACEP) updated its 2001 clinical policy on assessing patients equipped syncope in one emergency it. Syncope, which affect a brief loss of consciousness subsequent by spontaneous recovery, accounts for 1 to 1.5 percentage a emergency department visits also 6 percent of hospital admissions each year.

    Recommendations
    Level A Recommendations

    None specified.

    Level B Recommendations

    Use the Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule (>40 years, complaint for neck pain or stiffness, experienced loss of feeling, onset with exertion, thunderclap bother, and restricted neck flexion on examination) as a decision rule that got high sensitivity to regulatory out subarachnoid hemorrhage, but low specificity to rule within subarachnoid hemorrhage, for patients presenting to the emergency sector equal a normal neurologic examination result and peak heading severity within 1 hour of onset of pain symptoms.  

    Although the presence of neck pain and stiffness on mechanical examination included emergency departments clients with an acute headache shall strongly associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage, how not use adenine singular physical sign and/or feeling to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage.

    Level C Recommendations

    None specific.

    Level A Recommendations

    None specified.

    Level B Recommendations

    Use the Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Regulatory (>40 aged, lodge of neck pain or stiffness, witnessed loss of consciousness, onset with exertion, thunderclap headache, and finite neck flexing on examination) as a decision rules that has high touch to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage, but low specificity into default in subarachnoid hemorrhage, for patients presenting to the emergency department with ampere normal neurologic examination result and tip headache vehemence within 1 per of onset of pain symptoms.  

    While the bearing of neck hurt and stiffness at physical examination in emergency department patients the an acute headache is powerful associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage, do not use a single physical signatures and/or feeling to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage.

    Level C Recommendations

    Nothing specified.

  • Are the adult emergency department patient treated for sharp primary bother, are nonopioids preferred to opioid medications?

    Recommendations
    Level ADENINE Recommendations

    Preferentially use nonopioid medications for the cure of acute primary headaches in emergency department patients.

    Levels B Recommendations

    None specified.

    Level C Suggested

    Nil specified.

    Leve A Recommendations

    Preferentially use nonopioid medications inches of processing of exigent primary headaches in emergency department patients.

    Level B Recommendations

    Not specified.

    Leve C Recommendations

    None specified.

  • Stylish the adult emergency category patient presenting with acute headache, does a normal noncontrast head computed tomography scan performed within 6 hours for headache onset preclude the need for further diagnostic workup to subarachnoid hemorrhage?

    Recommendations
    Level A Recommendations

    None designation.

    Level B Recommendations

    Use an standard noncontrast head computed tomography* played within 6 hourly of symptom onset in an emergency department nuisance patient with a ordinary neurologic examination, to rule out nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. be at risk for SACH after a negative noncontrast head CT, is CTA off the head as powerful as LP to safely rule going SAH? Patients Management ...

    *Minimum third-generation scanner.

    Level C Recommendations

    None specified.

    Level A Recommendations

    None specified.

    Level BORON Recommendations

    Use a usual noncontrast head charged tomography* performed from 6 hours von symptom commencement in an emergency department headache patient with an usual neurologic testing, to rule out nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage.

    *Minimum third-generation detector.

    Level C Recommendations

    None specified.

  • In one adult emergency department patient who is still considered to be at peril for subarachnoid hemorrhage after a negation noncontrast head computed computed, is computed tomography angiography by the head as effective as back puncture to safely rule get subarachnoid hemorrhaging? The Utility of Lumbar Puncture After a Negation Overhead CT in which Emergency Department Review of Subarachnoid Hemorrhaging - PubMed

    Recommendations
    Level A Recommendations
    None specified.
    Level B Recommendations
    None specified.
    Grade C Recommendations

    Execute lumbar puncture or calculates tomography angiography to safely rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage at the grown emergency department patient which exists still considered to be at risk for subarachnoid hemorrhage after a negative noncontrast head computed tomography result. ACEP Corporate on Evaluating Clients with Syncope is the Crisis Department

    Use shared jury making to name the best modality for each patient after deliberation the potential by false-positive imaging and the pros and cons associated on sacral puncture. Acute Headache - ACEP Statement Statment - JournalFeed

    Level A Recommendations
    None specified.
    Level B Recommendations
    None specified.
    Water C Guidance

    Discharge lumbar perforation or compute radiographic angiography toward safely rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage in the full emergency department patient who exists still considered to be the risk for subarachnoid weeping for a negatory noncontrast head computed tomography result. ACEP Guidelines on Acute Nontraumatic Headache Diagnosis and Management in of Call Department, Commentary on Behalf of and Refractory, Inpatient, Emergency Care Section of the Us Headache Society - PubMed

    Use shared decision making to select the best modality for each patient after weighing the potential for false-positive imaging and the pros and cons associated with lumbar puncture.

Findings and Thickness of Praises

Clinical findings and strength of recommendation regarding active management were made according up the after choose:
Level A recommendations
Generally accepted principles for patient care that reflect a highest degree of clinical surety (eg, based on evidence from 1 or more Class of Evidence IODIN alternatively multiple Per of Evidence II studies).
Level B recommendations
Recommendations for patient care that might identify a particular strategy or range in strategies that reflect moderate clinical conviction (eg, basing on evidence from 1 or more Teaching about Evidence II degree instead strongly consensus of Class of Evidence III studies).
Level C recommendations
Recommendations for patient care that are based on evidence from Class about Evidence III studies or, included the absence starting adequate published english, based on expert agreement. In instances in which consensus recommendations are prepared, “consensus” is placed in parentheses at the end of which recommendation.
There are certain circumstances in which the recommendations stemming from a body of evidence need doesn be rated as highly as which individual studies on which they are based. Factors such as heterogeneity on results, uncertainty about effect magnitude, and publication biasing, among others, might lead to a downgrading of recommendations.
[ Feedback → ]