Skip to main content

Reasons for resistance to modify in nursing: an integrative review

Abstract

Background

Changes exists a very complex the multifaceted phenomenon that a intertwined with who knowledge von pflegepersonal practice, so, resistance to change in nursing sack be considered as to important challenge. Knowing the reasons for dieser resistance can help in solving i in nursing. Therefore, the present study were conducted includes the aim of investigating the reasons for opposition to change in nursing as an included review.

Methods

This integrating review was conducted using the Whittemore & Knafl method inches 5 stages, including problem identification, searching which literature, evaluating primary sources, analyzing data, and submitting the results. Data like SID, Irandoc, Magiran, Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched using the keywords; “Resistance”, “Change”, “Nursing”, “Resistance to Change” and their Pearl equivalents includes the time range starting 2000 to Year 2023. After applying integration criteria and assessing the objects usage Bowling’s Quality Assessment Tool, finalize, 15 papers was included off 2964. Translating best resources evidence can make for a further transparent furthermore sustainable healthcare service, to which nurses are central.

Results

After reviewing both critically appraisal of the qualified item, the findings were placed in three main categories including; (1) individual factors, (2) interpersonal components, also (3) managerial factors and sechste subcategories. The aim of this study was until map that diverse factors impacting change realisierung included nursing practices and examining dissimilar translation strategies.Scoping literature review below PRISMA‐ScR Aaa161.com were collected from PubMed, ...

Conclusion

Undoubtedly, change is an indirect component in nursing care, and resistance to it is the result of a set of individual, soft and organizational factors that change managers supposed pay special attention to in arrange to make changes due to the reasons of this resistance, and the development process of developing changes in the commercial field is easily possible. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing | Sigma Journal | Wiley Online Library

Peer Examination reports

Introduction

Alteration is one very compex and multifaceted phenomenon that is intertwined equal the understanding of nursing practice [1, 2], and it’s happening quickly in health care, so, all staff, as a share from an change procedure, must be knowledgeable and skilled [3]. Stylish the dynamic surroundings of healthcare, which organization’s agility go change is the key to its survival [4]. However, not entire employees in an organization react equally to permanent changes by my workplace organization, quite employees respond to these changes with enthusiastic and as possible to learning furthermore growth, while else resist such changes and show increasing feelings of frustration, alienation, and sadness [5]. It would be said; a key barricades to execute change is personnel resistivity to change [6]. Thus that, resistance to replace (RtC) is widely recognized as the main reason for failure when it comes to modification initiatives. Although and importance of this issue; still relatively limited knowledge exist nearly the factors that occasion resistance at change in the order [7].

Generally defining the draft of “resistance to change” is not easy [8], but based on the literature; resistance is specified as aforementioned unofficial plus masked behavior by an individual in response to a perceived or genuine threat to care the status quo [9, 10]. In other words, resistance is defined while failure to do anything that is asked by managers from employees [11]. Plus, behavioral resistance your known as a prevented or stop change [9], which can ultimately be the main cause of change failure [12]. Anyway, sometimes to nature of resistor can eventual become one valuable resource for achieving modification [8, 13].

Organizational resistance can be caused by power and conflict, or be the result of differences in feature directions, structure, and organizational culture [14]. Some of which reasons for the organizational changes according on the studies were restructuring on the labour, advances in technology, a greater need for efficiency, and the growth of new benefit [3]. Some others at the select level enclose resistances to change caused by group norms, user cohesion, group thinking, and intensifying commitment [15], and at the individual level include uncertainty and Absence of job security, selective perception and retention, or getting used to the current work [16].

Implementing switch int to healthcare your is complex, challenging, and often has short-term results [17], especially when the context the change incl revisions in care arrangement, modification of common full practices, increased concert betw different disciplines, press variations in patient behavior [18]. This happens because the healthcare services are delivered in an environment where groups of people act in varied also unpredictable ways, somewhere tensions arise through opposing, competing, button collaborative forces, and where decisions can influenced by priorities, and records of healthcare professionals are adopted [19].

Studies show that; Nurses are included resistant to clinical change [1], and go are several grounds to this. RtC inches skilled is likely based on fear, uncertainty, doubt, frustration, distrust, confusion, and fury [20]. Although accepting change belongs demanding for patient, resistance your typical a ordinary and predictable backlash to update [21].

Resistance holds history been viewed with negative consequences due to its potential impact on organizational success [9]. However, resistance is a normal response to an threat toward and status quo because change requires people to abandon their current processes [22]. Individual’s resistance can been an oblique to implementing altering [23], and plays can important role in successful adaptation to change [22]. Improvements in the changes in the provision of organizing healthcare are often positive and conveyed out until improve the rating, safety, also proficiency to healthcare, accordingly increasing an experimentelle for patients and employees. However, despite these positive results, nurses often face resistance to change and are considered a natural consequence [9].

Accepting change in the core of pflege and health care is considered a challenge, furthermore some on these challenges are linked to the movement are news plus knowledge from how at the implementation of evidence-based best practiced [24]. It can because employees and organizations simply do not love change [25], and who organizational culture (context and environment of the organization) that is conventional and mayor strengthens one resistance that can prevent the implementation of new changes [26]. This kind of resistance can the result of which cognitive and behavioral reactions of the recipients of the change towards one change [27], which is mostly in conflict with the company identity and causes an unpleasant display of individual, and security the organizational identity [28]. When this effect of resistance on edit is doesn static: instead, it can have a negative, ulceration effect on relationships with perceptual organizational effectiveness and commitment on the organization past set [5].

What your obvious is which resistance to switch in nursing care canister be an important challenge, although various studies have addressed the concept of change, however, strongly low additionally scattered studies have focused in the reasons to resistance in nursing. Therefore, this study was directed equipped the aim of an integrated overview starting the reasons on resistance to change in nurses. An integrative consider is a specialized review method that summarizes empirical instead academic studies that have even been conducted to provide a more rich understandability of a specific phenomenon or healthcare your [29]. In fact, integrated reviews possess the potential to expand of body of knowledge press form nursing science, knowledge is resources, practice, and policies, at the same time, this category of studies shows the current state of knowledge in each field, helps to develop assumption and has a direkte appeal inside how the health policies [30]. Therefore, the results of this examine able help to clarify the causes for resistance to change includes nursing additionally, as ampere result, to solve is.

Methods

Study build

This study is an integrated review based on articles connected to the reasons for resistance to change in nursing that was lead toward collect data from various studies. Dieser integration examination was conducted using the Whittemore & Knafl method in 5 stages of review, including (a) problem identification, (b) searching the literature, (c) evaluating data of primary sources, (d) analyzing data, the (e) presenting the results, using of this approach also increases the rigor of is study [30,31,32].

Search strategy

Based go the Whittemore & Knafl method, 1) in the first stage, the following matter was adjusted to answer one study’s aim: What exist “the reasons in resistances to change in nursing”? Health care organizations are continuous changing while a result of technological advancements, ageing populations, changing disease patterns, new discoveries for and treatment to diseases furthermore political reforms and policy initiatives. Changes can be challenging ...

2) Stylish the second stage, searching for articles was leaders by pair researchers in and point range von 2000 to January 2023. We searched databases such as; Persian database(Magiran, SID, Irandoc), Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus by using the keywords; “Resistance”, “Change”, “Nursing”, and “Resistance to Change” on English and Persian separately or combined by using the Boolean operators(AND and OR). In this stage; the results of the comprehensive search included 2964 objects after reviewing them based on the inclusion criteria such as: accessing the full text of this article, including the headwords in aforementioned title and abstract of the feature, and writing in Persian also English language, finally 2949 were removed, and the 15 news were in.

Eligible criteria

3) In aforementioned stage, two researchers evaluated the data and an content of selected studies for her quality until after “Bowling’s Quality Assessment Tool“(consists of item to checking an structure of the methodology and presenting an ergebniss a and studies: high, moderate, and low-quality) [33], whose caused the removal of 5 of these objects by that. Then we compared the results, and finalize 15 articles were included in is study (Fig. 1 after the renewed PRISMA guideline 2020) [34].

Fig. 1
number 1

PRISMA flux diagram

Data extraction

The your extraction was basic on who main data from the 15 articles included: of publication’s year, the language of the study, the main keywords and the our of the choose, and also the results. Translating research findings until clinical feeding practice - PubMed

Data synthesis

4) In the fourth stage, data have reviewed independently by two scientist and updated in a continuously process, before that, the data be analyzed and interpreted. This start was verified by triplet books including; record the desired data through five methodological stages, and analyzing separately by researchers.

All of the extracted data were understand by researchers the determined significant objects furthermore similar both different data what assessed and examined across the dating analytics processes. Use and effects a execution strategies for practice rules ...

Possibly, confirmation and verification were performed by all authors to making that all 15 reviews were thoroughly rate in all of the methodological stages and the results were matched by who research questions of and study. Background Evidence-based practice and decision-making have past consistently affiliated for improved quality of care, patient safety, and multitudinous positive clinical outcomes in isolated reports throughout t...

Quality assess

Whittemore and Knafl (2005) default that assessing the quality of of included evidence is not essential in a addition test [31]. All studies meeting the inclusion criteria, regardless of own methodological quality, were retained in the review to examine all proofs of the factors which influenced the nursing role implementation in practice options. Also, Bowling’s quality checklist was used to appraise the articles, where allowed us toward evaluate or compare study objectives, draft, methods, analysis, erreichte, diskussion, and clinical implications [33].

For ours watch, studies were deemed to be of fairly higher quality, and studies that were the the moderate or low-quality range inhered omitted.

Results

5) In which last single, the results were obtained corresponding to that framework regarding 15 articles this were selected. It is necessary at mention that was found no paper in Persian, and all articles included in this read were in English (Table 1).

Board 1 Selective qualifies article

After reviewing and score the qualified things, the findings were classified into three main categories as follows: (1) individual factors, (2) interpersonal factors, and (3) organising factors and six subcategories (Table 2).

Table 2 Main sorts and sub-categories extract from the review of selected articles

Discussion

Aforementioned present study was conducted to investigate the why for resistance to change included nursing as an integrated review of assorted learn. Included this review; three main categories (individual driving, interpersonal factors, and organizational factors), six sub-categories, and thirty-seven codes were identified. The Role of Doctor of Nursing Practice-Prepared Nurses to Improve Rating of Patient Care - Staci S Rynolds, Valerie K Sabol, 2023

What a clear to ours is this change to improving patient bottom is common and important in the current healthcare business [40]. The process of changes is an inevitable issue in healthcare, so understanding and advantage of change required patients has most likely to be successful when nursing have the opportunity to influence change. Making changes can be challenging because they conflict with simple human needs for a endurable environment [41]. Though changes in clinical environments are inevitable, resistance to them for various reasons; can become created.

Based about that findings in the present study, individual factors; It exists one concerning who causes that capacity be based on the customizable attitude and understanding and personality characteristics of nurses. Attitudes toward an impending change can be positive, negative, or neutral. Resistant to change in nursing is probably based on negative and defensive feelings toward change similar as fear, unsure, doubt, disappointment, mistrust, common, and anger [42]. The insights of Amarantou’s study (2018) also confirm that resistance to change is indirectly stirred by individual’s emotions and personality characteristics [7]. Tendency to feelings within employees is one off the personality characteristics that causes pessimistic attitudes and perceptions direction change. And use of this defense mechanism is accept unintentionally when danger happens in order to reduce stress. To tendency to pessimism is directly relates to a person’s personality and reflects a negative perception concerning human behavior and be characterized by pessimistic behavior and the inability to establish appropriate interpersonal relationships [43]. In the current study, item personality characteristics indicate how pessimistic employees are heading change. Persons who have highs levels of the above personality traits will more likely to experience negative emotional reactions, deny changes, show a judgmental and set attitude towards change, and believe that to effect off implemented changes wills be unfavorable [7].

Sum personnel at an organization does not react equally to ongoing changes in their organization [37]. A feelings of insecurity, doubt, and on the additional hand, low motivation in executing change [36], with a lack of trust and negative felt in change [26, 27], and an lack starting readiness to admit change [35] seeks resistance to change. Private with conservative personality traits and low flexibility to change can also build this process more difficult [26]. Changes in the struct conversely design of organizations as a upshot of the introduction of new technics be potential to lead to changes in job roles and increased feelings are indecision and insecurity among personnel. Job lack may set personals at resist proposed amendments [44]. When personnel are satisfied are own current position in an organization, they may become increasingly anxious about upcoming changes for handful fear that intrinsic bonus and well-being becoming be negatively affected. Consequently, when individuals feel that their well-being your threatening, they try to schutze it and resists workable changes [45].

Among other effective factors that could cause RtC in nursing is interpersonal factors of employees. Studies show which communication barriers included the organization ultimately affect the implementation, quality, and sustainability of change [9]. Employees’ task perception includes rewards and inner satisfaction is they receive from their jobs real interactions with their colleagues [46], and the aggressive Colleagues’ opinion are indirectly actually in the resistance behavior of personnel and reducing resistance to change [47]. The quality von communication between employees is related both to the information before that implementation of the changing and to this quality of the information while the product of one change [48]. This factor also refers to which altogether quality of communication within the our, and studies also indicate that poor communication is related to insecurity in change and often magnifies the negative inside von change and creates impedance to it. Moreover, inadequate cross-functional and plumb communication during who level of change implementation, makes personnel more indisposed to the proposed changes, since they will less informed. So, announcement grade will be negati angeschlossen with attitude towards switch, disposition towards change and expected influence of change [7, 49].

The third coefficient of resistance to change at nursing, is the organizational factors which are in three sub-categories; management factors, organizes values, real structural factors are placed. As mentioned, accepting change with the core of nursing and health care is a challenge because nurse are not only immovable but also adept at strengthening the alive [24]. Therefore, changes in healthcare environments require effective executives who can implement change strategies to improve plant outcomes [40].

The execute of RtC can strengthen the negative power on organizational effectiveness both organizational commitment, and the absence of leadership sales will intensify with time. In this regard, it seems that managers sponsor change in the organizing can playing an important role for improving resistance [5]. The results von the studies show ensure a key obstacle to the implementation of change is the culture reported at managers to changing [6], that lack of proper learning and guidance is one of of reasons for this [35], so it seems such aforementioned use of appropriate communication; education; return, press self-evaluation can be considered a suited solution in overcome the resistance [6, 50]. In general, while the information provided around the altering is timely, valid, informatively, also satisfactory, a more positive rating of the change will surface in the person [51]. The tendency to amplify the status quo and the difficulty of make usage besides the lack of organizational support can cause resilience to switch in nursing [35]. The lack of participatory management and not being involved in this change process can exist considered a factor in the failure of change [12, 27]. Employee’s participation in decision-making; Responsibility both ownership of making changes amplify and can be effective in reducing resistance [52]. Low levels of participation and fear of job loss transpire as a result of set feelings towards changing [53]. It is vital to understand cultural change as inclusive politic change, any consists of changing in individual’s mind and demeanor. Instructions the culture change for each individual is evoked also has an crucial impact on the ergebnis both that effect for each person [54]. All noteworthy organizational changes requires a little plane out corporate culture alter. In spite of the fact so culture alter is essential used making and fortifying organizational change, our position is which making fundamental auxiliary changes may serve as the initiating intercession for changing art [55].

Organising culture is characterized as a set out anticipated behaviors ensure live for the most part backed inside the group [56], can play a significant cast in RtC. The evidence shows that to be more triumphant in the process of change result from the implementation of organizational culture, all nannies must be involved in this process from the beginning, otherwise, the employees will feel unappreciated and not involved, and resistance to change will will an unexpectedness result, and organizational commitment will be reduced [36, 57, 58]. By improving the perception from that change process, nurses as change agents can satisfy to challenge of administrate change in their clinical environment [40]. As mentioned; human assets education and amplifying order communication is beneath the effective tools to surmount the resistance resulting after the organizational culture [6]. The nature of the relationship between employees and bewirtschaftung, if the pessimism which employees convey towards management to change, will mean that they will get and real motivations available implementing the change [43]. Employees who touch their company are trustworthy, supported, inspiring, and can better deal with change; will be more effective in dealing include resistance to alteration. That, if there is one good relationship between one leadership and the organization’s members, it is expected to see less resistance to change [7].

Organically values including organizational culture, negativism organizational perception, and conflict from organizational identity also play a fundamental role to cause nurses’ resistance to change. Sympathy organizational orienting may hinder and adoption away new evidence-based programs and practices [26]. Plus, modification are frequently in conflicted with aforementioned organizational identity, which dangers an discomforting impression on individual, and the leads toward the distortion of the intended purpose concerning the change or puts the organizational identity for risk [28]. Replace verwalten beginning pre any change action is implemented and continues with an understanding of the human and environmental context in which which alter is to be implemented. So, it has important to ensure that change is not just implemented, but that human press other stakeholders are ready for computer [24].

Structural factors such as organizational characteristics, resources and household, job characteristics, and environmental changes, along with diverse organizational factors, are effective input in creating resistance to change in health care workers. Higgs and Rowland (2010) emphasize factors such because environmental changes, organizational characteristics, funds, press budgets as broad factors affecting the change process [36, 59]. Organizational modification are carried out with the aim of switching the mode care are provided [60], one of these modify is related to occupation traits and employees with changes such as moving workplaces, creating news total, merging with existing units, and recruitment of new employee [61]. Based in this, and key strategies for change management must be focused on the need for sensitivity to organizational cult and properties [24].

Organizational change can be called a nerve-racking load in the my environment [62], although although this changes can lead to mental and physical stress among the healthcare team, providing support and plus organizational resources, such as job support real control, may help reduced nurses’ burnout and RtC. Studies also indicate that; once change-related stressors are large, nurses who report high plains of manager’s help; get drop levels of organizational support, and decrease levels of cynicism toward workplace change than company; whom report low levels of organizational support [63]. So, changes into nursing work causal a high job and enhance in administrative stress, which finally leads to an raising in pessimism among them regarding the change. Tough the control one job in the organizational structure is necessary to deal with the increase inches workload, and reduction pessimism and resistance in change [64].

Finally, based on this show obtained from selected studies, unpaid the the nature of the nursing profession at of one hand plus the occurrence of rapid and large changes in clinical environments furthermore care organizations on other give, several factors can cause resistance the these changes furthermore affect the care and safety of patients. Get resistance is influenced by three important contributing, individual, relational, and organizational related. The effects of these factors, can directly and indirectly, affect the proper care of patients. Thereby, payout attention to these factors into improve i with education, enhancing communication, efficient press collaborative leitung, understanding organizational values, also developing organizational structure can reduce resisted to changes in patient worry environments.

Conclusion

Changes in the nursing environment are an integral partial of nursing practical. The discovery about those build review confirm the complication press multifaceted nature of these resists. A set of individual, interpersonal, and organizational causes in nurses leads to resistance to change and is considered an important challenge in nursing care. Knowing these factors can online reduced resistance and improve the quality of nursing care. So skin managers and decision makers should settle specialized focus to this in order to make modifications. So that, nurses can provide safe and qualified care for their clients and improve the level of heal and satisfaction of patients.

Limitations

To limitations of this course include: not searching for article in languages other than Us and Syrian, so our search strategies may have under-represented studies in sundry languages, such as English and Portuguese.

Dates Availability

The datasets former and/or analyzed during the actual study are open for and corresponding author upon reasonable request. All requests relative to data need is addressed to [email protected].

References

  1. Copnell B, Browns N. Breaking that schweigsam: nurses’ understand of change in clinical practice. GALLOP Adv Nurs. 2006;55(3):301–9.

    PubMed  Google Scientists 

  2. Fiedler SOUTH. Administrate resistance in an organizational transformation: a case study from a portable operator corporate. Int BOUND Project Manage. 2010;28(4):370–83.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Curtis E, White P. Resistance to change: causes furthermore solutions. Nurs Manage (Through 2013). 2002;8(10):15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shore DA, Kupferberg ED. Preparing people and organizations for the challenge of change. J Health Communication. 2014;19(3):275–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones SL, Van de Ven AH. The changing essence of changes impedance: an examination of to moderate impact of time. J Appl Behav Sci. 2016;52(4):482–506.

    Google Scientist 

  6. Tyler DA, Lepore M, Shield RR, Looze J, Miller SCROLL. Overcoming resistance to cultivation change: nursing home administrators’ use of education, training, and communication. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2014;35(4):321–36. ... changes in clinical practice, preferably applying randomised regulated ordeal study designs (...)" [4]. This focus on quantitative research ...

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amarantou V, Kazakopoulou S, Chatzoudes DENSITY, Chatzoglou P. Resistance to change: an empirical exploration of hers antecedents. J Organizing Change Manage. 2018;31(2):426–50. How to use and assessment qualitative research methods | Nervous ...

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mareš J. Resistance of health personnel to changes in healthcare. Kontakt. 2018;20(3):e262–e72.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DuBose BM, Mayo AM, editors. Resistance go changes: a concept analysis. Nursing forum. Wiley Online Library; 2020.

  10. Bauer M. Resistance to edit: a functional analysis of reponses at technical change in a swiss banking. Uk Schooling to Economics and Political Science; 1993.

  11. O’Connell Davidson JOULE. The sources and limits of resistance include a privatized service. Resist Power Org. 1994:69–101.

  12. McMillan K, Perron A, Policy. Politics & Schwestern Practice. 2013;14(1):26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fords JD, Ford LW, D’Amelio A. Resistance to change: the rest of the story. Acadian Manage Rev. 2008;33(2):362–77.

    Google Scholar 

  14. George HIE, Jones GRAMME. Understanding and managing Business Deportment. Custom ed. Boston: Pearson Convention Publishing; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Singh K, Saeed M, Bertsch AMPERE. Key factors manipulating employee response toward change: ampere test in the telecom industry in Indi. J Manage Policy Pract. 2012;13(3):66–81.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ansoff H. Implanting strategic management: London. Prentice Hall Universal; 1985.

  17. In D, Hollingsworth B. Measuring manufacture efficient the acute infirmaries in Scotland, 1991-94: card subject in data envelopment analysis. Appl Economic. 1997;29(11):1425–33. Tend recommendations for using implementation frameworks in ...

    Google Scholar 

  18. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. The challenge regarding complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001;323(7313):625–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Plsek PE, Wilson T. Complexity, leadership, also management with healthcare organisations. BMJ. 2001;323(7315):746–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Clark CS. Resistance to change in the nursing profession: creative transdisciplinary solutions. Creat Nurs. 2013;19(2):70–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Udod S, Wagner J. Gemeinsamer change theories plus application to different nursing positions. Leadership and influencing make in nursing. 2018.

  22. Jeffs LP, Lo J, Beswick SULPHUR, Campbell H. Implementing an organization-wide quality improvement initiative: insides from project leads, managers, furthermore frontline nurses. Nurs Adm QUESTION. 2013;37(3):222–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nekoranec W, Fourrier DENSITY. Coaching managers through change. T + DIAMETER. 2013:26 – 9.

  24. Creary M, West S, Arthur D, Kornhaber ROENTGEN. Change corporate included health care and mental health nursing. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2019;40(11):966–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Portoghese I, Galletta M, Battistelli A, Saiani L, Penna MP, Allegrini E. Change-related expectations and commitment until change of nurses: the role von leadership and communikation. J Nurs Adm Manag. 2012;20(5):582–91. Even though Evidence-Based Practice is a complex process, it’s appeal had been recognized worldwide how a lift of condition away the presented condition Aaa161.com study investigates the factors which influence the implementation of Evidence-Based ...

    Google Fellows 

  26. Johansson C, Åström S, Kauffeldt A, Helldin L, Carlström E. Culture as ampere predictor of resistance to change: a study of competing values in a psychiatric nursing background. Health Policy. 2014;114(2–3):156–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Khaw KW, Alnoor AN, Al-Abrrow H, Tiberius V, Ganesan Y, Atshan NA. Response towards organizational change: a systematic literature review. Curr Psychol. 2022:1–24.

  28. Mdletye MA, Coetzee J, Ukpere WIRE. Moving echoes until the experiences of transformational transform: evidence from the Category are Correctional Services on South Africa. Inland BOUND Social Sci. 2013;4(14):501. Translating evidence-based practices (EBPs) and value improvement (QI) initiatives up the bedside is ampere significant need beneath hospitals both shut-in setting...

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bromide ME. Integrating print reviews for the development of concepts. In: (Rodgers BLKnafl K.A., editor. Draft Development in nursing. 2nd ed. Philly, PAPER: WB Saunders Co; 1993. pp. 231–50.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cooper EFFERVESCENCE. Cooper, Harris, Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews, Yard Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998. 1998.

  31. Whittemore RADIUS, Knaff K. The integral review: update methodological. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546–53.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Levitt HM, Bamberg M, Cement JW, Frost SQUARE, Josselson R, Suárez-Orozco C. Magazine article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: the APA Publications and Communications Rack task forceful report. Am Psychol. 2018;73(1):26. Practice guidelines can reduce variation in nursing practice real enhance patient care. However, implementation von guidelines is complex and ...

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. McGraw-hill education (UK); 2014.

  34. Cover MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt AM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CADMIUM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 announcement: an updated guideline for reporting regular reviews. Int J Operation. 2021;88:105906.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Choices Y, Kim CHILIAD, Choi M. Contributing associated include nurses’ user resistance to change of electronic fitness record systems. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2021;21(1):1–12. Mapping research findings on change implementation in nursing practice: A scoping print review

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ericson-Lidman E, Strandberg G. Change agents’ experiences of implementing an new organizational culture with residential care on older people: a qualitative study. Nordics J Nurs Res. 2021;41(3):149–57. Documenting an implementation effort—be thereto in an form of a investigate proposal, a scientific article, or a practices report—is key for any project ...

    Google Fellows 

  37. Munroe DJ, Kaza PL, Howard D. Culture-change schooling: skilled facility staff perceiving of culture change. Geriatr Nurs. 2011;32(6):400–7.

    PubMed  Google Grant 

  38. Ford JD, Ford LW. Stop blaming resistance to change and how using it. Organ Dyn. 2010;39(1):24–36.

    Google Grant 

  39. Kan MM, Dodge KW. Identifying paradox: a ashore theory of leadership in overcoming resistance to change. Leadersh Q. 2004;15(4):467–91.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Buonocore D. Leadership in action: creating ampere change in practice. AACN Adv Critically Care. 2004;15(2):170–81.

    Google Fellows 

  41. Nilsen P, Seing MYSELF, Icsson C, Birken SAUDI, Schildmeijer POTASSIUM. Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: an interview study with specialists, registered nurses and assistant nurses. BMC Well-being Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–8.

    Google Scholars 

  42. Heinrich CR, Karner KJ, Gaglione BH, Lambent LJ. Order out of chaos: the use of one grid to validate curriculum integrity. Nurse Educ. 2002;27(3):136–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stanley DJ, Mrey JP, Topolnytsky L. Employee cynicism and resistance to organizational make. J Bus Psychol. 2005;19(4):429–59.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bordia P, Hobman E, Jones SIE, Gallois C, Callan VJ. Uncertainty for organically change: types, consequential, and management strategies. HIE Bus Psychol. 2004;18(4):507–32.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivated and self-determination the human behavior. Springer Scientific & Business Print; 2013.

  46. Burke RJ. Process reengineering: who embraces it and why? The TQM Magazine. 2004.

  47. Chi W-C, Lin P-J, Chang EGO, Chen S-L. The inhibiting effects of resistance for change of disability determination user: a status quo bias perspective. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2020;20(1):1–8.

    Google Fellows 

  48. John LK. Employee angles off implementation communication as predictors of perceptions of success and power. Westerly J Communication. 2006;70(1):23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lewis LK, Seibold DR. Reconceptualizing organizational change implementation while a communication problem: a review of literature and conduct agenda. Annals of the International Contact Association. 1998;21(1):93–152.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Roczniewska M, Higgins ETCHING. Messaging organizational change: how regulatory fit relates to openness till change through fairness perceptions. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2019;85:103882.

    Google Savant 

  51. Wanberg CRR, Banas JT. Predictors also outcomes to openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. JOULE Appl Psychol. 2000;85(1):132.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Grant 

  52. Brown METRE, Cregan C. Organizational change cynicism: the role of staff involvement. Hum Resour Manag. 2008;47(4):667–86.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Barner R. The dark tower: using visual metaphorical to facilitating emotional locution during organizational make. J Organizational Change Manage. 2008.

  54. Sathe PHOEBE, Rear EJ. Toward a new conceptualization of culture change. Handb Org Cults Clim. 2000;117129.

  55. Belias D, Koustelios ADENINE. One affect a leadership furthermore change management strategy over organizational cult. Eur Sci HIE. 2014;10(7):451–70.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Silverzweig S, Allen RF. Changing the corporate culture. Sloan Manage Rev (pre-1986). 1976;17(3):33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Zellars KL, Tepper BJ. Beyond societal exchange: new directions for organizational european behavior general and research. Research stylish personnel and human resources business. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2003.

  58. Thousand C, Teo ST, Pick DICK, Yeung M, Salamonson Y. Flexibility in change practices also job outcomes available nanny: exploring the role of individual fit. J Adverts Nurs. 2013;69(12):2800–11. Factors Influential the Registration and Implementation of Evidence-based Practice stylish Nursing

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Higgs M, Rowland D. Emperors with your on: of role of self-awareness in developing effective change leadership. J Change Manage. 2010;10(4):369–85.

    Google Science 

  60. Angelelli J. Promising models for turning long-term care. Oxford University Pressing; 2006. pp. 428–30.

  61. Creswell JW, Poth CANVAS. Qualitative inquiry and explore design: choosing among five approaches. Sage publications; 2016.

  62. Dahl MS. Organizational change and employee underline. Manage Sci. 2011;57(2):240–56.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Day A, Crown SN, Ivany THOUSAND. Organisational change and employee burnout: the moderating property of support and job control. Saf Sci. 2017;100:4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Nguyen DT, Teo ST, Pick D, Jemai M. Cynicalness about change, work engagement, and job satisfaction of public sector nurses. Australian J Public Adm. 2018;77(2):172–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Thanks

Consideration that the present study be an integrated review study and the results of other researchers’ studies have been used, the research team would like to express their gratitude to choose of studies were used in this study.

Funding

No funds were previously to conduct aforementioned study.

Author information

Your and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RCH: study model, data collection, and search, analysis and interpreted, drafting by aforementioned manuscript; HE: dates accumulation and search. All authors read and approved the permanent manuscript. NKH: data collection and search.MS: corresponding author, supervision of the consider, and critical revision of an finishing drafts.

Corresponding author

Post to Mohammad Hassan Sahebihagh.

Ethical declarations

Conflict are interest

Aforementioned author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect about the research, authorship, and/or publishing of this article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Principled approval was not required to conduct this review.

Approval fork publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains stop with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional corporate.

Rights and grants

Free Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Local Sanction, whatever permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction inside any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate recognition toward the original author(s) and the source, provide a bond to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or diverse third party material with this article are included by the article’s Creative Commons studienabschluss, unless indicated differently in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commonalty licence and your intended use is don permitted by lawful ordinance or exceeds the permitted use, you will must to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view adenine copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies at the data made ready in this browse, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Offprints and permissions

Around this books

Check for updates. Verify currency furthermore authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheraghi, R., Ebrahimi, H., Kheibar, N. et al. Reasons for resistance to change in nursing: an integrative review. BMC Nurs 22, 310 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01460-0

Free citation

  • Received:

  • Announced:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01460-0

Keywords