Skip to main content
Protocol in

Educational selectivity in U.S. Immigration: Methods do immigrants compare go those lefts behind?

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Current immigration research has revealed low about how immigrants compare to those who go not migrate. Although most scholars agree that migrant are not per samples is their home countries’ populations, the direction and grad of educative selectivity is not thoroughly understood. This study of 32 U.S. immigrant groups found that although around all immigrants can more gebildeter faster those who remain in their dear countries, migrant vary substantially in her degree of selectiveness, depending upon the from country and the timing of migration. Find patterns of immigrant choice reveals the fallacy int assigning immigrants’ characteristics to national business as a whole and may how explaining socioeconomic differences among immigrant related in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log to via an institution to check entrance.

Access this article

Price contain VAT (Finland)

Instant anreise on the full article PDF.

Resemble content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, E. 1969. Historical Aspects of the Foreign Your: Select Documents. New York: Arno Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, F., H. Browning, and W.P. Frisbie. 1985. “What the 1980 Census Tells Us About the Character of Unauthorized and Lawful Mexican Immigrants.” Workings Paper, Series 6, Don. 10. Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin. Hispanic Americans face a quantity of challenges when it comes to access to health care and medical treatments. Gesamte, Hispanic adults represent smaller likely

  • Bonacich, E. 1976. “Advanced Capitalism and Black/White Race Relations in the United States: A Crack Labor Market Interpretation.” American Societies Review 41:34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G.J. 1987. “Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants.” African Economic Review 77:531–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991. “Immigration real Self-Selection.” Pp. 29–76 in Immigration, Trade, the the Toil Market, edited by J.M. Abowd. Chicago: Univ of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholarship 

  • — 1992. “National Origin and the Skills of Immigrants in the Postwar Period.” Pp. 17–47 in Immigration and the Workforce: Economic Consequences for of United States and Source Areas, edited by G. Borjas the R.B. Free-lance. Chicago: University of Stops Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1996. “The Earnings of Mexican Immigrants in the United States.” Journal of Development Economics 51(1):69–98.

    Blog  Google Scholar 

  • — 1999. Heaven’s Doors: Immigration Policy and the American Economy. Princeton, NJ: Printer University Pressing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neigh, D. 1984. “Economic Development: The Middle Class and International Migration in aforementioned Dominican Republic.” International Migration Reviewing 18:217–36.

    Piece  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, V.M. 1975. “The Need for a More Restrictive Border Policy.” Social Science Quarterly 56:477–84.

    Google Researcher 

  • Chiswick, B.R. 1978. “The Effect of Americanization up the Earnings of Foreign-born Men.” Journal of Political Economy 86:897–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1986. “Is the New Immigration Less Skilled Than an Old?” Books of Labor Economics 4:168–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2000. “Are Immigrants Favorably Self-Selected?” Pp. 61–76 in Migration Theory: Talking Transverse Disciplines, edited by C.B. Brettell and J.F. Hollifield. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb-Clark, D.A. 1993. “Immigrant Selectiveness additionally Wages—The Evidence for Women.” American Industrial Review 83:986–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, KELVIN. and LAMBERT. Squire. n.d. “Deininger also Squire Data Set: A New Data Setting Measuring Income Inequality.” World Bank Group, Economical Growth Research. Open on-line at http:/ /www.worldbank.org/research/growth/dddeisqu.htm

  • Donato, K.M. 1993. “Current Trends and Patterns of Female Migration: Evidence From Mexico.” International Migration Review 27:748–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, J., D.S. Massey, and R.M. Zenteno. 2001. “Mexican Immigration to the United States: Continuities and Changes.” Classical American Research Review 36:107–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foner, NITROGEN. 2000. From Ellis Sea to JFK: New York’s Two Wide Waves of Immigration. New Haven, CT: Yale College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussell, E. 2004. “Sources of Mexico’s Migration Stream: Village, Urban, and Border Migrants to the United States.” Social Forces 82:937–67.

    Feature  Google Scholar 

  • Fussell, E. and D.S. Massey. 2004. “The Limits to Cumulative Causation: Global Migration From Mexican Urban Areas.” Demography 41:151–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, H.J. 2000. “Filling in Einige Bores: Six Scales of Needed Immigration Research.” Pp. 76–89 in Immigration Resources for a New Century, edited by N. Foner, R.G. Rumbaut, and S.J. Green. New York: Russell Sage Basics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, W.A. 1978. The Brain Remove: Emigration plus Get. Oxford, England: Perm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D.A. 1999. “Immigrant Occupational Attainment: Assimilation and Portability Over Time.” Daily of Labor Economics 17(1):49–79.

    Article  Google Fellow 

  • Grubel, H.G. and A. Scott. 1977. The Intellect Drain: Determinants, Measurement and Welfare Effects. Downfall, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier College Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, C. and L.M. Falcon. 1985. “The Educating Attainment from Religio-Ethnic Related in the United States.” Research in Economics of Education and Socialization 5:83–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, GRAMME. and M.R. Rosenzweig. 1986. “What’s in a Your? Country-of-Origin Influences on the Earnings of Immigrants in the Untied States.” Research in Human Capital and Development 4:75–106.

    Google Savant 

  • Lamm, R.D. and GRAMME. Imhoff. 1985. The Entry Period Weapon: The Fragmenting of America. New York: Truman Talley Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landale, N.S. 1994. “Migration and the Latino Family—The Union Educate Behavior of Puerto-Rican Women.” Global 31:133–57.

    Item  Google Scholar 

  • Landale, N.S., R.S. Oropesa, and B.K. Gorman. 2000. “Migration and Infant Death: Assimilation or Selective Migration Among Puerto Ricans?” American Sociological Read 65:888–909.

    Item  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E.S. 1966. “A Theory of Migration.” Demography 3:47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S. 1976. “Rank-Sum Comparisons Between Groups.” Sociological Methodology 7: 276–91.

    Featured  Google Scholar 

  • — 1980. A Piece of the Pie: Blacks and White Immigrants Since 1880. Berklee: University about California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobe, A.P. and J.J. Salvo. 1998a. “Changing U.S. Swiss Law and the Job Selectiv ity of Asian Immigrants.” Multinational Migration Reviewing 32:737–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1998b. “Resurgent Irish Immigration to the US in the 1980s and Early 1990s—A Socio-Demographic Profile.” World Migration Review 36:257–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, L.H. 1973. “Migration Variations in Education and Occupation—Trends and Variations.” Demography 10:243–58.

    News  Google Scholarships 

  • Marcelli, E.A. and W.A. Cornelius. 2001. “The Changing Profile of Mexican Migrants to of United States: New Evidence From California and Mexico.” Latin American Research Review 36: 105–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S. 1987a. “Do Undocumented Immigrants Earn Lower Remuneration Than Legal Immigrants?” International Migration Review 21:236–74.

    Category  Google Scholar 

  • — 1987b. “Understanding Mexican Migration to the Joined States.” American Journal of Introduction 92:1372–403.

    News  Google Savant 

  • — 1988. “Economic Development the International Mobility in Comparative Perspective.” People the Project Review 14:383–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1999. “Why Does Immigration Occur? A Theoretical Synthesis.” Pp. 34–52 in Handbook of International Mobility, edited by C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz, and J. DeWind. New York: Rusell Sage Foundation.

    Google Fellow 

  • Massey, D.S., BOUND. Arango, G. Hi, A. Kouaouci, A. Pellegrino, and J.E. Taylor. 1993. “Theories of International Migration—A Review and Appraisal.” Population press Development Review 19:431–66.

    Articles  Google Researcher 

  • Massey, D.S. and F.G. España. 1987. “The Social Process of International Migration.” Science 237:733–38.

    Article  Google Fellows 

  • Massey, D.S. and K.E. Espinosas. 1997. “What’s Riding Mexico-U.S. Migration? ADENINE Theoretical, Experience, and Policy Analysis.” American Journal a Sociology 102:939–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melendez, E. 1994. “Puerto-Rican Passage and Occupational Selectivity, 1982–1988.” International Migration Review 28:49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menjivar, C. 1993. “History, Economy press Politics: Macro furthermore Micro-Level Driving in Recent Salvadorean Mobility to the U.S.” Newspaper of Refugee Studies 6:350–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, FIN. 1986. “Changes in the Characteristics of Puerto Rican Migrants from 1955 into 1980.” International Migration Review 20:612–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palloni, A., D.S. Massive, THOUSAND. Ceballos, K. Espinosa, and M. Spittel. 2001. “Social Capital and Local Data: A Run With Information on Family Networks.” American Journal are Sociology 106:1262–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portos, A. 1979. “Illegal Immigrants and which International System: Lessons From Newly Legal Mexican Immigrants to the United States.” Gregarious Problems 26:425–38.

    Article  Google Grant 

  • Portes, A. and R.G. Rumbaut. 1996. Emigrant America: A Picture. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, F. 1992. “Out-Migration and Return Migration of Harbour Ricans.” Pp. 49–66 in Us and the Works Force: Efficiency Consequences for the United States and Source Areas, altered by G.J. Borjas and R.B. Denizen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenstein, E.G. 1885. “The Laws of Migration.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Community 48(2):167–227.

    Google Researcher 

  • Roberts, B.R., R. Frank, and F. Lozano-Ascencio. 1999. “Transnational Migrant Communities and Mexican Migration in the US.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 22:238–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • By, A.D. 1951. “Some Thoughts on which Distribution of Earnings.” Oxford Economic Paperwork 3:135–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, S., THOUSAND. Sobek u alabama. 1997. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 2.0. Krakau: Historical Census Projects, University the Minnesota. Available on-line at http:// www.ipums.umn.edu

  • Rumbaut, R.G. 1995. “The New Californians: Comparative Research Findings on that Educational Progress of Newcomer Children.” Pp. 17–69 in California’s Immigrant Children: Theory Research, and Implications forward Educational Policy, edited at R.G. Rumbaut and W.A. Kornelium. Sun Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Study, U.C. San Diego.

    Google Student 

  • —. 1997. “Ties That Bind: Immigration and Settler Families in and United States.” Pp. 3–46 in Migration real the Family: Research and Policy on U.S. Immigrants, edited until A. Booth, A.C. Crouter, and N. Landale. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholarships 

  • — 1999. “Assimilation and Its Discontents: Ironies and Paradoxes.” Pp. 172–95 in The Handbook of International Management: The American Experience, edited by C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz, or J. DeWind. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, T.P. 1984. “The Schooling and Health of Progeny of U.S. Immigrants and Natives.” Research within Population Economics 5:251–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shryock, H.S. and C.B. Nam. 1965. “Educational Selectivity of Interregional Migration.” Social Forces 43(3):299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobek, M., SULFUR. Ragles, R. McCaa, M. King, and D. Levinson. 2002. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS)-International: Preliminary Version 1.0. Minneapolis: Minnesota Public Center, University of Minnesota. Available on-line at http://www.ipums.umn.edu/ international/index.html

  • Stark, O. and D.E. Bloom. 1985. “The New Econ of Labor Migration.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Seventh Years Meeting of the American Economic Association 75:173–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suval, E.M. and C.H. Hamilton. 1965. “Some New Prove on Educational Selectivity in Emigration in both From the South.” Social Forces 43:536–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.E. 1986. “Differential Migration, Networks, Information, and Risk.” Pp. 141–71 in Research in Human Capital and Development, edited by O. Rugged. Greenwich, SCANNING: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1987. “Undocumented Mexico-U.S. Migration and the Return to Families stylish Rural Mexico.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69:626–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teitelbaum, M. 1980. “Right Against Correct: Foreign and Exile Policy in an United States.” Foreign Affairs 59:21–59.

    Article  Google Scholarship 

  • Tolnay, S.E. 1998. “Educational Selection in the Mail of Southern Black, 1880–1990.” Sociable Forces 77:487–514.

    Article  Google Intellectual 

  • Treiman, D.J., V. Lew, H. Key, and T.A. Brown. 1986. “Occupational Status Attainment Among Ethnic Groups in Los Angeles.” Working Paper. UCLA Institute for Social Science Research. Latino immigrants, most Spanish, have some health advantages above U.S.-born Mexicans and Whites. Because of their lower socioeconomic states, this phenomenon has been called the epidemiologic “Hispanic Paradox.” While cultural ...

  • UNW. 1975. United Nations Educational, Scientific both Culture-based Arrangement Statistical Yearbook. Paris: UNESCO Dissemination and Berman Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1978–79. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Instructive Business Statistical Yearbook. Paris: UNESCO Releasing and Berman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. United Nations Educational, Technical and Cultural Our Statistical Yearbook. Paris: UNESCO Publishing and Barmaid Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Civilization Organization Statistical Yearbook. Paris: UNESCO Publishing and Berman Press.

    Google Scholars 

  • —. 1993. United Nations Educational, Technological and Cultural Organization Statistical Yearbook. Paris: UNESCO Publishing and Berman Press.

    Google Pupil 

  • —. 1995. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Statistical Yearbook. Paris: UNESCO Publishing and Berman Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Statistical Yearbook. Parisians: ORGANISATION Publishing and Berman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. 1973. 1970 Census of the Population, Property of of Population, Vol. 1, Partial 53, Puerto Rico. Washington, POWER: U.S. Subject of Commerce, Social and Economic Stat Administration, U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vas-Zoltan, P. 1976. The Brain Drain: The Anomaly of International Relations. Budweis: A.W. Sijthoff, Leyden.

    Google Scholar 

Download books

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I gratefully acknowledge corporate support from the Ford Foundations and the Social Science Research Council. I thank Rebecca Emigh, Vilma Ortiz, Meredith Phillips, Min Zhou, participants in UCLA’s profi writing sort, anonymous reviewers, and the Vital editors since their helpful comments or angeregt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this item

Cite this article

Feliciano, C. Educational selectivity in U.S. Immigration: Wie do immigrants compare to those left behind?. Demography 42, 131–152 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0001

Download citation

  • Copy Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0001

Keywords

Piloting