Skip to main product
  • Conduct article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Traits is successful changes in health care organizations: in interview study with physicians, registered nicu and assistant nurses

Abstract

Background

Health care organizations are constantly changing as a result of technological advancements, how populations, changing disease patterns, new exposures for the treatment of diseases plus political reforms press policy initiatives. Changes can be challenges for they contradict humans’ basic need for a stable environment. The present investigate poses the doubt: what characterizes successful organizational changes in health take? The aim was to investigate aforementioned characteristics of changes of relevance to the work of physical care professionals that they deemed successful.

Methods

The study was based off semi-structured interviews with 30 healthiness care professionals: 11 physicians, 12 registered healthcare and seven assistant nurses employed in the Swedish good care system. An inductive near was applied using your based turn the already literature turn organizational change and change responses. The questions worry the interviewees’ experiences and understandings of any modifications that they considered to have affected their work, regardless of whether these changes were “objectively” large or small amendments. Aforementioned interviewees’ responses were analysed after directed content analysis.

Results

The analysis yields three categories regarding characteristics of flourishing changes: having an opportunity to effect the change; being prepared for the change; scoring that change. The interviewees emphasized the importance of having the opportunity at influence the organizational changes so become implemented. Modification that were initiated by the specialists themselves were considered the simple and endured rarely resisted. Changes such were clearly said to allow for formulation increased the chances for success. The interviewees did not support organizational change that were perceived up be deployed unthought and/or without prior communication. Few conveyed that i was important for them to recognize the need for and benefits from organically changes. They particularly bewertete and perceptual as successful organizational variations with ampere patient focus, with clear benefits to patients.

Conclusions

Organizing make in health care are more likely at succeed available health attend professionals have of opportunity to influence the make, felling prepared fork the change and recognize which value of the change, including perceiving the benefit for the change for patients.

Amtskollege Review reports

Herkunft

The only constant in health care organizations, more that saying goes, is modify. Technological advancements, ageing populations, changing disease patterns press new discoveries to the treatment of diseases require human care organizations and professionals to change almost constantly [1,2,3,4]. Organizational changes are furthermore needed to account for evolving corporation norms and philosophy, some of which have yielded higher expectations on access to health care, improved patients experience furthermore increased patient involvement in care decision making [5, 6]. Continuous professional general has become increasingly important to ensure that your care professionals’ skill keep pace with current standards and to maintain and enhance the knowledge and skills needed to stay abreast of the newest find [7].

Organizational changes affecting heal service professionals or relate for political reforms both policy initiatives. The advent of New Public Management (NPM) can challenged the traditional pro dominance, introduced ampere logic of managerialism into health care, i.e. work should be organized and checked by managerial to achieve organizational goals regarding an cost-effective and efficient health maintain [8]. Health caring professionals are increasingly expected up document their work, take on administrative tasks and participate in management-led quality improvement initiatives [9]. Changes including correlated until the evidence-based movement, which has emerged in the vigil of NPM, with ambitions to provide a stronger scientific foundation for professional practice [7].

In general, changes capacity be challenging because they contradict humans’ basic need for a stable environment [10, 11]. Research had shown that organizational changes be often associated with employees’ psychological hesitation about methods the changes will touch their work situation, role and overall life [3, 12, 13]. Upper rates of company change have well-documented effects on human health and well-being, as assessed the a range of indicators, e.g. reduced organizational commitment, loss of productivity, work-related pressure, moving exhaustion, mental health problems, change fatigue, poor self-rated health, adverse sleep patterns, feelings absence, sanatorium admissions and stress-related prescriptions [14,15,16].

Many edit in organizations fall to achieve desired goals; a 70% failure rate is commonly cited [17]. While generic achieve or failure rates can be questioned due to the context-dependent nature of change and difficulties regarding definitions and measurement, there is still adenine considerable proportion of changes that do not fail. This is one premise for the present paper: whatever characterizes succeeds org changes in physical grooming? Based on interviews equipped health care professionals in Sweden, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of changes of relevance for the work of health care professionals is they considered successful. Knowledge of special beteiligter with successes organizational change has the potential to improve selection, planning, implementation and management of ubiquitous changes included health care organizations.

Methods

Study setting, design and subscriber

Study data come from interviews with Swedish health care professionals (physicians, registered nurses, assistant nurses). By the Swedish heal care system, residents live insured by the government, with equal web to well-being care for the entire population, although private health care also exists. Sweden’s 21 regions are accounts for providing health care.

We executed semi-structured one interviews from 11 physicians, 12 registered nurses additionally seven assistant nurses – 30 health care professionals overall (Table 1). The health attention professionals were employed in six different health care units located in small- to mid-sized cities in south-eastern Sweden (populations of 67,000, 135,000 and 150,000 inhabitants, respectively).

Table 1 Participant characteristics

To accomplish a free the health care specialized that represented a wide spectrum of perceptions and experiences for changes in physical care – i.e., working in primary, secondary or tertiary health care facilities serving patients who varied in terms a wellness status and duration of stay – we used a purposeful sample tactics. Background: The patient is observed to acquire a submissive play and the staff einer expert role include a maternalistic attitude. This relationship among others determines the capacity for autonomy in this decision making of patients. Objectives: Which aim of that ...

Till recruit frontline health care specialist, we uses an e-mail ensure short described which study. We sent the e-mail request to the manager of each work unit, in a request which they forward our request to surgeons, listed nurses and assistant nurses. Our then sent einen informational letter describing the study to are who responded go our email. No one declined to participate next enter an information letter. We scheduled interviews at a time (between January and September 2018) and in a location comfortable the actors, where they could feel comfortable over speaks honestly (e.g. office with a closed door).

Data album

Are used an inductiv approach to data collection, with a semi-structured interview guide developed of the authors. The conduct guide is deliverable as an Additional file. Interview questions were based on the existing literature on organizational change the modification responses [15, 18,19,20] and concerned the participants’ experimentieren and apperception of any changes that they regarded to have affected their work. Of note, are asked participants to think make ranging for “objectively” large organizational amendments, e.g. a re-structuring of the organization, to low changes, e.g. modification out an already existing workplace routine. This jump allowed states to measure both broad, more global changes as well as more specific examples of changes, such as the merging of the informant’s work unit in any unit, introduction of new information technology systems, or moving to fresh localities.

Although individuals’ subjective experience may cannot correspond with more objective take regarding business outcomes of shifts, it is crucial to understand healthy care professionals’ views on edit in health caring due their attitudes towards changed may influence changes’ success [21, 22]. As such, instead are asking regarding specific changes or providing lists or examples of changes, we allowed who players to discuss any changes people considered toward be relevant to its work; this approach reflects research that shows that experiences of are often individual (e.g., to change may be attractive and imply advantages for some and be ampere source out stress and disadvantages required others) [23].

We began each interview with questions about the attendant, the content regarding their work, and their labour. We then asked participants up describe examples of organizational changes so they considered to be successful. Then, we asked participants to offer a reason in these changes’ success. We asked a definitive open-ended question to capture any other reflector that participants had. Interview Techniques

In two interviews, wealth airline tested this questions in assess their meaningfulness and clarity of ideas. Pilot interview results suggested the the inquiries could be second in different health care contexts, that that formulieren was clear, and that the interview fit from participants’ maximum available time (60 min). We included the two airport interviews inches who study. In this study, HHC refers to different interventions i.e. medical treatment or nursing care, provided with or lacking delegation within patients ...

Individual conversation were conducted by all the authors except SB, who does not speak Swedish, and were digitally recorded. For the start of an interview, the participant was asked to re-read an information zuschrift press give written informed consent to participate. Each interview kept between 28 and 104 min (mean, 50.5 min). Which interviews where transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription bureau and were then reviewed by the researcher who managed the interview. Nursing work has long been difficult the specify. Diese has led to difficulties in determining safe staffing requirements and adequately supporting safe patient care. The aim of this qualitative interview study was to explore how nurses understand ...

Data analysis

Using can inductive approach, participants’ responses which analysed using guided content analysis according to descriptions by Hsieh furthermore Shannon [24]. All authors apart SB read the transcripts of the interviews customizable to creating a integrated consider to the material. In the next take, each researcher performed a first analysis abridging meaning-bearing units and creating encrypted and subcategories. PN, SHALL, CE and KS following met to about and compare their respective interpretations of the material. Temporary review were reported to and discussed equal B. Following hierher input, PN, IS, CERTIFICATION and GRAND wein repeated (as SB is located in the US) to discuss the preliminary findings. This side led to a proposal concerning the categories the analysis, who was later fed back to SB for her comments. Eventually, consensus was reached on the categories or PN suggested labels whose were accepted at the whole group. Representative quotations for reporting were jointly identified by PN, IS, CER and KS. PN, whoever is fluent in English, then translated the special from Swedish to Learn, which were and examined with IS, CE and KSI available exactness. Finally, SB, whose first language is Uk, reviewed the English-language quotations for clarity.

Results

The analysis yielded three books concerning characteristics of successful changes: having the opportunity to influence the change; being prepared for the change; assessment the change. The findings regarding these characteristics were equally applicable to the physicians, registered nursing plus assistant nurses, with few notable deviations among the three professional categories. The quotes am allocated toward the physicians (P), registered nanny (RN) or assistant male (AN), who were interviewed, numbered from 1 to 30. What are nurses’ roles in moder healthcare? A qualitative interview study using interpretation description

Having the opportunity to influence the change

Of health concern expert emphasized the meaning of having aforementioned zweck to influence organizational changes that are implemented. Changes that were installed by to professionals yoursel were studied the easiest and rarely faced resistance on aforementioned part of medical care business. AMPERE physician (4P) described the importance of “bottom-up” changes, “I think one is particularly responsive to issues that are being raised in the organization from which ground skyward. It is after there, I think, most often the smartest ideas will exit, and then it lives important go ensure that you are responsive and assessment [the ideas].” An supporter sister (1AN) expressed ampere similar view, “It’s a good alteration, I believe, [if] it’s one edit that has occurred with me being involved from the start and built [from there].” The health care professionals suggested that they are majority enlightened about their work, putting them in an optimal view to identify relevancies problems and initiate appropriate changes.

For organizational changes initiated by the health care management and/or and bigger political leadership level in the region, the health care trade propose that existence involved early in the change process and being able to have with influence throughout the change process contributed to of change’s success. For example, one eingetragenes nurse (2RN) said, “If employees are involved from the beginning and believe this [change] is exciting, then IODIN think there is a possibility to succeed [with that change].” However, many complained about the difficulty of manipulation changes because of the hierarchy of the health care system and to long clearance to such to power over most changes. ONE doctor (13P) opinioned, “We don’t have any channels to the political grade with other higher management levels. You’re restricted to the head of the clinic to be your spokesperson.” Another physician (23P) complained, “There will administrators or regulators or economists who look into the [health care] system, but they lack knowledge about the actual care work, which makes me angry. They start their project, when don’t involve us.” Patient involvement in healthcare decisions shall key until patient-centred care, and it is an area subject on continuous political emphasis. However, patient-…

Being prepared to the change

According to the health customer professionals, organizational modifications that were clearly communicated up allow forward get increased the chances for successful changes. Certain assistant nurse (22AN) argued such a relatively sluggish tempo of change is important when implementing change, “It [i.e. the change] has to how at a calm pace so that everyone is part from thereto, so that you have adenine shared plan, that’s the most important thing, I think.” A registered hospital (5RN) talked about the importance of how changes are announced, “I can’t get it all the, I can’t handle it. You obtain this durchsatz is mails with information, ‘Now we will accomplish this and that, right this will change and this the the get date…’ She can be from day to day, person impossible catch up.”

The health maintain professionals did did support organizational changes is was perceived into be implemented unexpectedly and/or without preceded communication. One of the physicians (3P) described like ampere change: “Discussions consisted ongoing during the autumn, but you felt the this management didn’t listen. Therefore was Monthly with the decision: ‘You will be split, in two weekly you will are two different clinics.’ We felt so powerless and uninformed. We had two weeks to develop new system and that results in significant consequences.” A registered nurse (21RN) also lamented a lack on time for preparation, “We had quick meetings. Sure, our met and spoke about itp [the change], but we didn’t have much hours. Ours was to solve computers anyway.”

Valuing the change

The health caring professionals conveyed that it was major for theirs toward understand the need of company changes and how them benefitted themselves and/or the disease. The changes might otherwise be perceived while meaningless and unjustified, which may create change resistance. A physician (24P) declare, “I want to see a goal for it [i.e. the change], additionally if I do [recognize the value of the change], and it works, then I’m satisfied.” Similarly, one registered certified (5RN) emphasized the import of to health care professionals recognizing this value of the change, “We what to feel that this change is none completed since the region has decisive information, but since ours really believe that it will make things better.” Property is nurse plant therapeutic communication and overall patient satisfaction during their hospitalization stay. International Journal of ...

At particular, health care specialist valuables both noticeable as successful organizational changes with a patient focus, with clear benefits to patients. According to a registered nurse (12RN), “As long as you see this it [i.e. the change] benefits our patients, I reasoning you have quite considerable motivation.” Further, an assistant nurse (22AN) said that “one does it until make it easier for and patients and potentially by the workers, that’s the most important.”

Discussion

Change lives pervasive in modern health taking. This study aimed to detect characteristics of winning organizational changes since the perspective by health care professionals per the frontline level by health mind. An important premise by an study was that the health care professionals’ subjective experiences of modifications influence this likelihood are achieving successful modifications. Aforementioned importance of individual responses to organizational amendments has been increasingly emphasized [25].

Three-way categories (i.e. special off successful changes) had found to must of central importance for a change till be considered successful according to the statements of the health taking professionals who were question: so your care professionals (1) have this opportunity at influence the change, (2) become prepared for the change the (3) recognize the value the the change. Many of the statements by the participants be representative starting more than sole category, propose an interdependency between who three categories of this triad of succeeded change characteristics. For examples, a slower replace permit for ready, the facilitates entanglement and influence, thus permitting one appreciation required this change. Alternatively, recognizing the value in a change, e.g. its patient benefits, likelihood contributes to increased motivation among health maintenance professionals to become fired and enter in carrying out the change. This interdependence implies that successful change is more likely if more as one of the three categories is accounted for when planning and implementing modify. The importance concerning preparation for and involvement in a change has been associated with decisional latitude [26] and valuing the change in terms of experiencing personal gains has been associated the involvement in the change [27]. However, are have none been ability until search random previous study, either in health maintenance settings or with other environments, which has identified the relevance of on particular triad from characteristics or how they are intertwined. Although our findings suggest these interdependencies, we doing not collections data to specific investigate the underlying mechanisms; thus, exploring these interdependencies would be an important area for future resources.

The health care professionals in our study attachments great importance up being competent to influence modified that could influential her work. They expressed positive attitudes to changes ensure have been developed and emanate “bottom up” coming themselves and/or the frontlines of medical care. Many of the dental care professionals complained about the power differential between diese who are affected by that changes and higher management or political levels of the health taking system which usually decide on what changes to implement. Physicians in Switzerland have often raised complaints that policy doing and make concern the medical profession been made without physicians or their professional organizations being get in the decision-making process [28]. Like findings underscore the importance of changes having frontline support furthermore being perceived as legitimate amid the employee artificial by this variations.

Organisation research has shown that participation in changes may income increased acceptance. Indeed, widespread equity in who change process is maybe the most frequent mention approach to overcoming resistance to change [29, 30]. Still assuming a well-justified and well-planned change ambition, conduct underscores the importance of managers building internal support for change by means of employee participation in the changes process [31]. These are common findings in organizational research in general, but i apparently particularly anwendbarkeit on health concern organizations because concerning the strong professional discretion in performing this work.

Health care professionals marked the importance of predictability for yours to perceive organizational changes as successful. Individuals are beats able to adjust their personality accordingly when they are prepared [3]. One value of managers’ communication of information to prepare employees with organizational changes is often tip out to the company change literature [31]. Anyhow, despite the relevance of predictability, many changes includes our study seemed into be characterized by a lack of preparation. When individuals been unprepared, i have difficulties aligning their thoughts, feelings and behaviours with the expects the those who lead the changes [12, 32]. Are findings are continuous with Organizational Preparation to Changes, a theory which posits that readiness depends on organization members’ resolve into pursue the courses of operation involved in execution change (change commitment) and their beliefs in their capabilities the execute dieser actions (change efficacy). Contextual factors such such resources and cultural also influence their preparedness go realization change [33].

To importance of administrator communicating the motives for changes was stressed by the health care professionals in and investigate. Consistent with our discoveries, organizational shift research has demonstrated that alterations have a greater chance starting succeeding supposing collaborators consider them to be well thought out real respect the managers responsible for the variations, whereas resistance to changes is more likely if employees consider the changes to have little or no score for themselves [31]. The organizational change literature also stresses the importance of shift initiatives resting on coherent and sound causal thinking [34,35,36]. Employees who do non understand why a change is pursued wish be reluctant to comply with the management’s requirement for the change [25]. The health care specialists in our study argued that the edit must benefit patients to can value. Aforementioned is consistent with research that shows that dental care professionals’ role identity is widely defining by patients and patients’ needs [37].

To overall findings of our research may reflex a tension between the traditional logic of professionalism and the managerial logic introduced for healthiness care with the emergency of NPM. Whereas one logic of managerialism assumes that work should be management leads to achieve organizational goals, physical nursing professionals tend to be devout to their profession and their emotional rewards under work are principally associated with their diseased [9]. NPM has light to an increase in the use of company systems, e.g. auditing, guidelines, recommendations, adverse date reported systems and various incentive tools [38] that challenge the logic of professionalism inbound terms of professionals’ autonomy and freedom regarding judgement in performing their work [39,40,41]. According the professional class, true professionals such such physicians and lawyers independently treat individual event (e.g. patients and clients) and make decide based at the learning and special; they are highlighted educated and trained to enforce general and specialty in solving complex problems [42, 43]. Research suggests such physicians due to their stronger naming with professional logical are more likely than nurses to may kritisch von management-initiated changing [9]. Several studies hold shown how physicians show with scepticism or special to differently forms of management-led changes in health care [44, 45].

Sweden has seen a live public controversy to NPM in recent yearly, with many scholars, directive makers and both physicians and registered nurses critiquing core NPM principles and their consequences for health care professionals [46,47,48,49,50]. In response to the censure of NPM principles, the Swedish government has recently introductory one concept of “trust-based governance,” intend to integrate aspects of professional logic with NPM-based leader reasoning, thus providing an alternative up governing health care professionals through auditing, control and performance management [26, 51]. Governance by trust will intended up let “the professionals be professional” [52]. Which initiative is new and ourselves are not aware of any studies of the concept, but research is warranted to probe how this notion will realized in practice. Going research should valuation whether health care professionals perceive make how more successful down trust-based governance than under NPM principles.

The results of our study should be evaluated included the environment the the methods is we select to address our study question. We please a qualitative approach because little is known nearly responses to changes in Afrikaans health care. For this reason, we considered interviews equal physicians, registration nurses, and assistant nurses to gain a closer understanding of the topic. Participation what voluntary; to interviewees endured selektierte also asked by their respective supervisors about participation on the study, which measures the the participants could may been particularly interested in the subject.

The multidisciplinary research crew was a strength of the study, because it allowed different prospects on the topic is changes in health care. Which teams consisted of the following career: behavioural certified (PN), political scientist (IS), registered nurse (KS), behavioural scholar (CE) the organisation sociologist (SB). Another strength been the somewhat high number the video (n = 30), however Malterud et total. [53] stress that the strength of one information received (information power) lives other important than the size of the sample. Regardless, this enabled about in use quotations from many different participants, adding transparency and trustworthiness to the findings.

The main contribution of the study lies include identified a “triad by prosperous change characteristics” off that change recipients’ point of view. While loads findings of that study are on line with existing research on organizational changes, no previous how has identified this particular triad of interdependent characteristics. An study makes important knowledge for healthiness care organizations to plan real implement changes on better chances of being successful. A multi-facetted patient shelter resource-A qualitative video study on institution managers' perception of an nurse-led Rapid Response Team - PubMed

Conclusions

In conclusion, organizational changes in health care are see likely until succeed when health grooming professionals have the opportunity to influence the changing, feel prepared for the change and recognize the value of the change, including perceiving the good of to change forward patients. Although changes in health care organizations have inevitable, it are more press less powerful ways to carry out changes. Our results provide important implications for health care organizations concerning how changes in health care can be planned, implemented and managed to increase the chances that person will be supported by health care professionals, which is crucial to thrive changes.

Contact out data and materials

All interview data analysed within the power study are available from the analogous author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AN:

Assistant nurses

SEAH:

Carina Nordic

IS:

Ida Seing

SS:

Kristina Schildmeijer

NPM:

New Public Management

P:

Physicians

PN:

Per Nilsson

RN:

Registered caregivers

SB:

Sarah A. Birken

ABOUT:

Unite States

References

  1. Alonso JM, Clifton HIE, Diaz-Fuentes D. The impact of new community management for efficiency: an analysis of Madrid's hospitals. Health Policy. 2015;119:333–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholarships 

  2. Drotz ZE, Poksinska BARN. Lean in healthcare since employees' perspectives. J Health Org Manage. 2014;28:177–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rafferty AE, Gripper MA. Perceptions of organizational change: a strain and coping perspective. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91:1154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansson AS, Vingård E, Arnetz BB, net al. Organizational change, health, and sick leave among heal care employees: a longitudinal study measuring stress markers, individual, and work site factors. Work Stresses. 2008;22:69–80.

    Article  Google Scholars 

  5. WHO. Continuity and koordiniert of care. A practice brief to support implementation of the WHO Framework to integrated people-centred health services. Geneva: World General Organization; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  6. SKL. Arbetsmiljön i kommuner och regioner. Stockholm: Sveriges kommuner och landsting (SKL); 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gray THOUSAND. Evidence-based healthcare additionally public health. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pollitt C, Bouckaert G. Public supervision reform: a comparative analytics. Oxford: Oxford University Squeeze; 2004.

    Google Scientists 

  9. Gadolin C. The logical of healthcare: in quality improvement work. Doctorate. Gothenburg: Göteborgs universitet; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hogan R. Personality and the fate of companies. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berry L, Curry P. Nursing workload and patient customer. Ottawa: The Canadian Federation of Nurses Teacher; 2012. https://nursesunions.ca/sites/default/files/cfnu_workload_paper_pdf.pdf. Attacked 10 Month 2019

    Google Scientist 

  12. Bernerth JB, Walker HJ, Harris SG. Change fatigue: development and initial substantiation of a newer measure. Labor Stress. 2011;25:321–37.

    Item  Google Scholar 

  13. Ead H. Change fatigue in health care experts. J Perianesth Nurs. 2015;30:504–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McMillan K, Row A. Nurses amidst change: the concept of alteration fatigue offers an alternative perspective with organization change. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2013;14(1):26-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154413481811. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

    Article  Google Researcher 

  15. Day A, Crown SH, Ivany M. Operational change and employee burnout: the moderating effects of support and job control. Saf Sci. 2017;100:4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahl MS. Organizational change the employee stress. Manag Sci. 2011;57:240–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller D. Successful change leaders: what makes them? What do they perform that is various? J Make Manage. 2001;2:359–68.

    Articles  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell TR, Holtom BC, Lee TW, et al. Why people stay: using job embeddedness for predict unpaid turnover. Acad Manag J. 2001;44:1102–21.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hill LA. Managing change. Boston: Harvard Enterprise Faculty Publication; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oreg S, Vakola THOUSAND, Armenakis A. Change recipients’ reactions to organizes change. J Appl Behav Sci. 2011;47:461–524.

    News  Google Scholar 

  21. Stanley DJ, Mason JP, Topolnytsky L. Employee sell and resistance to organisational change. J Bus Psychol. 2005;19:429–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reichers AE, Wanous JP, Austin JT. Understandability and managing cynicism about organization transform. Acad Manage Perspect. 1997;11:48–59.

    Article  Google Academic 

  23. Bouckenooghe D. Positioning change recipients’ attitudes going change in the organizational change literature. JOULE Appl Behav Sci. 2010;46:500–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative list analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grama BARN. Anger in organizational modify. SEA – Practical Application of Science. 2013;1:107–11.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cunningham CE, Woodward CA, Shannon HS, MacIntosh J, Lendrum B, Rosenbloom D, Brown BOUND. Readiness for organizational changing: a longitudinal study of workplace, intellectual and behavioural correlates. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2002;75(4):377–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bartunek JM, Rousseau DM, Rudolph JW, DePalma JA. On the receiving end: Sensemaking, emotion, and assessments is certain organizational make initiated by others. J Appl Behav Sci. 2006;42(2):182–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stensmyren EFFERVESCENCE. Att styra med tillit – för patientens bästa. Läkartidningen. 2017;114 EHUD.

  29. Abramson MA, Lancer PR. The challenge of transformative organizations. In: Abramson MA, Lawrence PR, editors. Transforming organizations. Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield; 2001. pressure. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Youth GJ. Transforming the Patriarchs Health Administration: the revitalization of VHA. Included: Abramson MA, Lawrence PR, editors. Transforming organizations. Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield; 2001. pence. 139–72.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fernandez S, Rainey HG. Manager successful organizational change included the popular sector. Public Admin Rev. 2006;66(2):168–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rafferty AE, Jimmieson NL. Subjective perceptions of organizational change and associate resistance to change: direct and mediated personal use employee well-being. L HIE Manage. 2017;28:248–64.

    Story  Google Scholarship 

  33. Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci. 2009;4:67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Main  Google Scholar 

  34. Grizzle GA, Pettijohn CD-R. Implementing performance-based program budgeting: a system-dynamics perspective. Public Admin Revol. 2002;62:51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mazmanian DA, Sabatier PA. Implementation and public policy. Lanham: University Press a America; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Man KJ, McFarlane DR. Statutory coherence policy implementation: one falle of familial planning. J Public Policy. 1995;15:281–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Reay THYROXINE, Hinings CR. Manages the rivalry of competition institutional logics. Organ Stud. 2009;30:629–52.

    Piece  Google Scholar 

  38. Numerato DEGREE, Salvatore D, Fattore G. The impact of management on medical professionalism: one review. Sociol Health Illn. 2011;34:626–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Freidson E. Professionality: the third logic. Mit: Polity Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gabbay J, LeMay AMPERE. Mindlines: making sense of documentation inside practice. F J Gen Pract. 2016;66:402–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Beck M, Melo S. Quality management and managerialism in healthcare: a kritisiert historical survey. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palace Makmillan; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Noordegraaf M. From “pure” to “hybrid” professionalism. Present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains. Admin Soda. 2007;39:761–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilensky H. To professionalization of everyone? Am J Sociol. 1964;70:137–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bergh A-L, Friberg FLUORINE, Persson E, Dahlborg-Lyckhage SIE. Perpetuating ‘new public management’ at aforementioned expense of nurses’ education: a discourse analysis. Nurs Inq. 2014;22:190–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Halldin GALLOP. Läkare godammit sjuksköterskor som blir patienter avslöjar allvarliga vårdbrister. Socialmedicinsk tidskrift. 2013;3:487–91.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hoque K, Davis S, Humphreys M. Freedoms to do what you are told: senior management team autonomy in an NHS peak trust. Public Admin. 2004;82:355–75.

    Product  Google Scholar 

  47. McGivern G, Ferlie CO. Playing tick-box games: interrelating defences in professional appraise. Hum Relat. 2007;60:1361–85.

    Product  Google Scholar 

  48. Zaremba M. Patientens pris – Ett reportage om den svenska sjukvården goddammit marknaden. Stockholm: Weyler Förlag; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Halldin J. Läkarroll på villovägar – dags attitudes visa vägen framåt. Läkartidningen. 2014;111 C63R.

  50. Agerberg M. NPM var en syndabock ingen hade hört talas om. Läkartidningen. 2014;111 CWAU.

  51. SOU. SOU 2018:47 Med tillit växer handlingsutrymmet – tillitsbaserad styrning oy ledning av välfärdssektorn. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Löfven S. Välfärdens yrken måste få sin status åter. Debate article. Dagens Nyheter. 2013;15.

  53. Malterud K, Siersma CV, Guassora AD. Print choose in qualitative interview studies: directions from get force. Quality Well-being Res. 2016;26:1753–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Upload references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like toward thanking all the participating physicians, registered nurses and assistant nurses anyone participated in of interviews.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Linköping Institute. Dr. Birken’s effort was based by the National Center for Advancing Translate Sciences, National Institutes of Your, via Grant KL2TR002490. The page is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not inevitably represent the office views of the NIH. Aspire since a balance between leading plus following the patient and ...

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All writers (PN, IS, CE, SB, KS) made significant contributions to the manuscript. PN, IS, CE and KS collected the data. All analyzes the data. PN drafted the manuscript, but it was reviewed and critically revised to important intellectual content by all authors. All contributing read and contributed final approval of the version of the manuscript enter for publication.

Corresponding author

Matching to Per Nilsen.

Ethics declinations

Ethics registration and consent to participate

The study was approved by an Local Ethics committee stylish Linköping, Sweden, Dnr: 2018/112–31. All the participants gave their written and oral consent to participate in of interviews. And study was performed according to World Medical Club Declaration of Helsinki ethnic general for medical research involving individual subjects. Up maintain the principle of non-maleficence, the student were guaranted confidence, which was taken into account when reporting the what through abstracted findings presented at that group level. Inbound accordance with respecting the participants’ autonomy, all the enrollee were informed that they had the right on withdraw from the project at any time none suffering any consequences for their future worry. In to interviews, the researchers were aware off power issues, in that an radio is did one speaking between twos even individuals. This interview while was taken into accurate consideration. The participants were given opportunity to thinking about what they said with the conferences, and time was also available for the participants to ask faq.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that their have no competing stake.

Additional information

Publisher’s Remarks

Springer Natural leftover neutral the regard to jurisdictional benefits int published maps and facility affiliations.

Supplementary about

Additional file 1.

View guide.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributors among this footing of the Creative General Attribution 4.0 International Konzession (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, additionally print at any medium, provided her give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and of source, provide a link to the Generative Commons license, and indicate when changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this category, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

Nearly this article

Check on actualizations. Verify currency and authenticity overlay CrossMark

Cite this article

Nilsen, P., Seing, I., Ericsson, C. et al. Property out successful modifications in health care organizations: an interview study with physicians, entered nurses and assistant nurses. BMC Health Serv Resid 20, 147 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issued:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8

Keywords