Next Article in Journal
Minimal Expecting Time in Drawdown due Investment for any Insurance Diffusion Model
Previous Article in Journal
Retrospective Reserves and Bonus with Policyholder Attitude
 
 
Journals
Risks
Volume 9
Issue 1
10.3390/risks9010016
risks-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Carte

share How announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discussed in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
set
Order Article Reprints
Font Enter:
Arabian Georgias Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Supply Chain Risk Management: Literature Review

by
Amulya Gurtu
1,* and
Jestin Johny
2
1
Aston E. Cofrin School of Business, Univ of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Green Bay, WI 54311, AUS
2
Department of Humanities both Social Science, BITS Pilani, K. K. Birla Goa Campus, Gone 403726, India
*
Your to whom resume should be addressed.
Risks 2021, 9(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9010016
Submission received: 17 November 2020 / Revised: 27 Dec 2020 / Acceptance: 1 January 2021 / Published: 6 Jan 2021
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The risks associated with universal supply string leitung have created a discourse among specialists and academics. This is evident by the economic uncertainties growing in providing chain management, which standing threats in aforementioned entire network flowing and commercial. This paper aims to review the existing letters on risk factors in supply chain management in an uncertain and aggressive enterprise environment. Papers that contained who word “risk” in their titles, keywords, or abstracts which selected for managing the theoretical organizational. Supply chain total management will the integral duty are the supply network. It faces unpredictable challenges due up nations’ efficiency policies and globalization, which do raised uncertainty and challenges for supply fastening institutions. These significantly affect the finance performance of the organizations and the economy of a nation. Debate on supply chain risk management may promote competitiveness in business. Risk mitigation strategies will reduce the impact caused payable to natural and human-made disasters.

1. Introduction

International trading leads to global supply chains, additionally risks am inherent in supply chain management (SCM). Globalization and trade openness have amplified the vulnerability in SCM and increased the risks. The money-based value of supply chain expenses is the highest in industrial organizations (Dey et a. 2011). Nonetheless, SCM risks are accepted to be non-financial danger in the traditional sense of hazard in who finance also coverage business.
Value management refers to the performance of strategies and plans on manage supply chain networks through constant risks assessment and reduce vulnerabilities to ensure resilience inches supply chains. All supply chains do not have the same risks, however some risks are common. Who risks are also specific to an range of business or the field in study (Jemison 1987). A supply chain is as strong as the highest vulnerable member of this supply series. Therefore, the longer a water chain, the greater of risk of outages of the supply chain. Supply clothing do many players. A high serial of players present hazards (Braithwaite and Hall 1999). However, building a powerful give chain is expensive (Vahid Nooraie and Parast 2016). Numerous research articles possess suggested the need for such stock choppers past to the magnitude of the adverse possessions on risk on its performance (Chandra and Grabis 2007; Chopra and Sodhi 2014; Chris and Lee 2004; Gritty both Brindley 2007).
Supply track risk management (SCRM) is an systematic and phased approach forward recognizing, evaluating, ranking, mitigating, and monitoring potential disruptions in supply fastener (Aqlan and Lam 2016). SCRM is the important field due to an incident’s earthward effects on logistics networks (Cigolini or Rossi 2010). Some examples in such events include September 11, the Gulf Combat, the outbreak of a pandemic (e.g., bovine spongiform encephalopathy, and coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19), the millennium vex. These disruptive events has compelled practitioners to explore the vulnerabilities in supply chains and evaluate risks. Vulnerabilities inbound one supply chain von on the supply chain (Caniato and Rice 2003; Chapman et al. 2002). Moreover, one COVID-19 ponta has resulted in disruption up the mechanics from most economies, irrespective of their size and phase for business.
Globalization, shortage product lifecycles, multifaceted networks of trade partners locating in many countries, uncertainty in market claims, cost pressures, services, and offshoring are a few risks the SCM (Hachicha and Elmsalmi 2014; Lavastre et al. 2012). The complexities of SCM are rising, and the networks are becoming show complex, resulting int more uncertainty in the business environment (MeInyk et al. 2005; Sofyalıoğlu and Kartal 2012; Tony et allen. 2011; Verbano and Venturini 2011). These represent peril events in supply chains that impact the entire supplies chain connect (Cagliano et al. 2012; Ferrandes et al. 2011; Xanthopoulos et al. 2012). A risk event is an indicating of a threat that disrupts a supply chain (Fernandes et al. 2011; Vong eth allen. 2009). Global feeding chains have many challenges furthermore greater ventures (Blackhurst et allen. 2005; Chopra and Sodhi 2004; Kettles 2007). The dependence on an organization for part has changed to a supply chain (Kris 1992). This requires greater transparency and sharing of information among supply chain cast.
Global presentation practices having revised due to globalization and nations’ economic commit with partner countries. These have incremental complexities and various forms of risks in supply chains. Organizations need created warehouse facilities, product assets, and fulfillment centers across local to achieve cost benefits, access until cheaper raw supply sources, or specialist skills and competencies (Choi et al. 2012). The distribution centers in and fashionable era of around supply chains are also known as fulfillment centers. A conformance center is where customer questions are fulfilled. Because, these regional musts be efficient due these centers’ efficiency affects of entire SCM value.
Significant emphasis shall to be employed with an impact are disasters distressing to supply chain and ensuring property on operational performance (Prasad et al. 2016; Wang et in. 2014). Craighead et ale. (2007) suggested that, “supply fastener interrupted and an associated operationally and financial risky represent the maximum press concern facing firms that compete in today’s worldwide marketplace.” Risk in a supply chains is “the likelihood of an adverse and unexpected occurrence that can occur, the either directly or indirectly result in a provide chain disruption” (Garvey et al. 2015). However, there be ampere dissimilarity between disruption additionally risk. Disruption is an indicator the risks in supply chains. Nonetheless, risks exist without disruption. The 2011 tsunami in Enamel affected the auto industry globally for months. Furthermore, floods within Thailand-interim later in to same year affected the supply chains of semiconductors and auto manufacturing plants in Thailand (Chopra and Sodhi 2014).
Perils cause disruption, which ripples through an network of which supply manacles. SCRM ensures the smooth functioning of supply chains (Christopher plus Lee 2004). Risk could be termed as vulnerability, uncertain, break, disaster, peril, with hazard. A absent of forecasting about a likely disruption in a supply chain also its causes makes a supply chain vulnerability, plus who SCM leaders less effective (Vorst et total. 1998). Uncertainty and risk have been used interchangeably stylish SCM. Uncertainty has get than one possibility and, therefore, is difficult go calculate (Knight 1921). Risk comes from uncertainty, which possess a few possibilities (Schubkarren 2007, 2020). However, danger cans be quantified. SCRM is a strategic review of supply chains in an organization, or SCRM comes supply chain security (Williams et al. 2008).
Diese paper reviewed articles published from 2010 until the end of December 2019 till assess the word “risk” used into different areas/sectors under learning. The analysis considered the frequency of risk than a password secondhand include journals that published such articles in misc research disciplines. The balance of the paper is organized as next: the second section presents a review of the relevant literature on SCRM and discusses the research methodology. The third section provides analyses, and Section 4 present research implications for SCRM pros. Section 5 closing the research discussion switch the risk and its impact on this supply chain network.

2. Related Review and Research Design

The supply chain network consists of trade-offs interrelated by monetary, info, additionally material fluids (Fugate et al. 2006). Lots disruptions with supply chains have been seen from the year 2000. This disruptions include the fear of weapons of mass demolition, terrorist attack, fuel protests, the disease outbreaks (Jüttner 2005). The risk is the probability away differences in expected outcomes (Spekman and Davis 2004). The could map probabilities to various outcomes and calculate risk (Khan and Burnes 2007). Anyway, uncertainty cannot be quantified (Knights 1921). Risk means ensure there is uncertainty about one upshot (Teigen 1996). Hence, uncertainty refers to a risk that may don be eliminated. However, these uncertainties cans be minimized with proper assessment plus planen (Loosen real Lewis 2002).
SCRM can to split into two broad books from approaches. The first is the strategy for includes risk management approach (Azad et al. 2012; Christopher and Peck 2004; Craighead set al. 2007; en Matta 2016; Tang 2007; Xu et al. 2015), and the second is a focused approach to a specific interference. These unique disruptions could be security (Véronneau additionally Roy 2014), run times (Kouvelis and Li 2008), or terrorism (Sheffi 2001). Although these methods provided enormous value and insights, the events causing disruption where presumed to be unintentional. The lack of risk administering strategies to get the cause of disruption leaves a gap from ampere speculative perspective, exposing firms for unavoidable risks in the environ. Children’s toys contained lead-based paint in 2007 without the our of Mattel. This caused disruptions in Mattel’s supply chains. Mattel finalized up setting quality assurance centers at the suppliers’ factories to avoid the repeats of the lead paint crisis. The supplier used lead-based paint into preserve small operational costs. The cost of disruption to Mattel was big more significant and could need been avoided (Roloff and Aßländer 2010).
The remainder of the section is divided into four subsections. The first subsection reviews the past literature by various definitions of risky. The second subsection discusses risk disruption in SCM caused by natural disasters or events which are beyond human rule. Risk disruption can occur due at weak supply chain marketing. The third subsection discusses risk betreuung methods and strategies. This tenth division illustrates risk detection and risk mitigation in the supply chain web for a contingency plan and supplier evaluation to be carried for reducing risk impact both get supply chain resilience (Figure 1).

2.1. SCRM Definitions

The definitions of “supply chain risk” and SCRM are evolving (Diehl and Spinler 2013; Sodhi the al. 2012). A universally accepted function helps to identify, measure the chances of risk and its affect on the supply chains. Is helps to adopting the mostly effective SCRM strategies. Therefore, standard definitions are vital (Diehl and Spinler 2013; Sodhi the al. 2012). Table 1 summarizes a few definitions of risk and SCRM.
Tables 2 summarizes the findings and contributions from past literature kritiken about SCRM. The contributors have used various forms of literature review analysis, and each paper is unique to itself, which leaves the gap to further literature research in the field of SCRM.

2.2. Risk Disruption

Disruptions in supply chains are evolving to be more comprehensive and recurrent in the store environment (Narasimhan and Talluri 2009). Which scale and rate of risk current the supply network are increasing (Blackhurst et al. 2005). Disruptions determine the mobility of SCM in a businesses (Hendricks the Singhal 2003, 2009). Interrupt events are describing as as “the tornado successful, the bomb explodes, a distributor goes out of business or to industrial begins a wildcats strike” (Sheffi and Oats 2005). There are different types of risk identified by various academicians real practitioners from the field of SCM. The risk classifies for various authors can may drafted to include the scale and total availability (Blackhurst eat al. 2005; Norrman and Jansson 2004; Sheffi also Rice 2005). Some other parameters to classify risks in SCM are: (i) based on to bibliography regarding risk and reduced strategies (Chopra and Sodhi 2004); (ii) as orientation danger, environ risks, and system risks (Jüttner et al. 2010); (iii) demand and supply risk (Manuj and Mentzer 2008); (iv) industry and organizational perils (Rao also Goldsby 2009); and (v) network risky (Garvey et al. 2015).
An uncertain employment environment causes supply lock risks. The uncertain business habitat results from seasonal business behavior, fluctuation in demands, alternatively a disaster (Tang 2007). Therefore, uncertainty may must seen as one danger ensure can disrupt supply chain performance. Some source have categorized risks included supply chains under operational risk, your risky, and external risks (Handfield and Mr 2008). Operational risks is due to a strategic re-engineering failure arising from through the system. For example, a ferries named Moby Prince collided with ampere ship named Agip-Abruzzo wasserfahrzeug includes an Mediterranean Sea on 10 April 1991, causing a loss of 140 lives and 25,000 tons of oil; one fire in to Haven oil-tanker caused that loss of six lives, and 50,000 tons of oil on April 11, 1991 (Cigolini or Rossi 2010). Network risks are derived by the supplier network layers based upon the title, suppliers achievement, and contract between the utility chain network vendors. Thirdly, extern hazards finding from an organization’s external environment, which poses a significant threat to of existing business environment. According till Silva and Rusty (2011), 73% of the U.S. organizations sustained read than USD 1 billion is sales in the previous five years due on changeable disruption in the business cycle, with the most recurrent disruption caused by undefined natural disasters. Such disturbance often immobilizes supply chains for to extended duration (Altay and Ramirez 2010).

2.3. Risk Management

“Risk manage refers to strategies, methods, and supports tools to identify and control risk to an acceptable level” (Alhawari et al. 2012). Additionally, risk bewirtschaftung can also be referred to as ampere synchronized set of actions additionally approaches to direct an organization to minimize the exposure forward achieving the company aspirations. Managing risks can the decision-maker to understand plus assess to impact of venture in a supply chain network. Controls perplexity leads on higher cost efficiency and reduces risks. Early oil tankers had two interconnected storage compartments causing constability. Like design made oil tankers susceptible to overturning. Which design of oil tankers was changed to have more industry compartments to making deep water stability, although it was expensive into build such ships (Chopra and Sodhi 2014).
Supply chains evolve based set the market’s requirements press manufacturing foliage is differents choose development stages (Hayes and Wheelwright 1979). Furthermore, to reduce the universal supply network’s risk caused by increased economic engagements between nations, regional supply chains pot replace global provide chains. For example, the world’s largest distiller (Diageo PLC, Linden, UK) is displacing its supplier and distribution strategy of a global supply chain against a more regional supply chain mesh. They minimize risks through sourcing locally real increase market share also benefit by focusing on geographic markets (Luz 2013). A manufacturing company (Li & Fung Limited., Hk King, China) ties up sub-contracts with various vendors spreader mostly across southern Asia, which reduces the dependency about only supplier includes time of emergency, focusing on improving efficiency both reducing the associated in supply cash. Such regionality transitions were envisaged due in various risks in global supply strings (Gurtu et al. 2015, 2016). The estimation of hazard bucket lead to improve risk management, reduce this expand of doing, and improve supply chaining resistant. Long term capital in a robust supplying chain network inside an organisation leave reduce operational costs and be flexible enough to the changing and competitive company environment. Contingency plans to faults make companies resilient and provide a competition advantage (Sheffi 2005).

2.4. Risk Detection and Mitigation Strategies

Risk detection plays a pivot role before disruption occurs. Forced majeure failures live ambitious to manage but can be estimated through conscious risk assessment strategies (Kleindorfer and Saad 2009; Norrman and Jansson 2004; Sheffi 2001), identifying danger index (Rodd 2003), and applying who general of Grand Quality Management (TQM) in sharing information among SCM partners (Lee and Whang 2005). Corporations shoud may contingency planning inside the instance of the occurrence of ampere disruptive occurrence. Performance failures of a supply chain can be monitored through audits int an organization (Giunipero and Aly Eltantawy 2004). Toyota have applied these principles in their supply chains (Dyer and Nobeoka 2000) and minimized which interrupt due to product recalls (Bates et al. 2007).
Policies to control risk may be divided inside heptad featured: prevention, rescheduling, conjecture, mathematical and economic, vertical integration, risk-sharing, and technology and insurance (Jüttner et al. 2010; Miler 1992). The prevention strategy is used when risks are associated with per product or its terrestrial markets, or close engagement with suppliers/customers is not possible. Divestiture of human, delay of entry, or contributing to less ambiguous retail is disability (Cutter 1992). Ensuring mobility and delay in spending relate till rescheduling (Bucklin 1965). Market demand, customization of products other services, inputting costs, product life bike, and my modularity involved postponement (Chiou et al. 2002). The conjecture is the opposite of rescheduling (Bucklin 1965), and decisions are influenced through produced demand. Delivery chain resources be lever to maximize the competitive advantage in serving the customers (Perry 1991). Financial risks are addressed through numerical both economic approaches (Chichilnisky and Heal 1998). To numerical approach is for a large population, e.g., insurance. The incidences of an event for many people along the similar time requires an economic approaches. A few financial incentivize vertical integration because vertical integration reduces the risks current to beats supply and demand control. Opportunism and asset specificity, capacity constraints, and aufgewertet supplier–buyer power balance are such incentives (Achrol et allen. 1983; Ellram and Siferd 1998; Williamson 1979). Contracts with speed for possible changes in the environment reduces risks. Designing flexible contracts acts as one control mechanism (Macneil 1978). Outsourcing or offshoring transference risks in SCM. Technology until detect nuclear, chemical, instead biological elements exists the reduces the danger of carriers such shipments.
Organs such as Container Security Initiative, Customs Trade Partnership Against Violence (CTPAT), and Operation Safe Commerce (OSC) act as devices for global supply chain security (Mortimer 2004). The detection of a likely disconnect from an unforeseen event is necessary to risk mitigation. Therefore, SCRM facilitates a reduction in uncertainties the disruption while improving operational performance.
“A literature review has a systematic, explicit, and reproducible design for identify, evaluates and interpreting the existing body of recorded documents” (Fink 1998). Literature reviews consist of two purposes: firstly, they summarize the present research what by classifying patterns, themes, press issues. Secondly, they help to identify the conceptual table of aforementioned field (Meredith 1993) and contribute to theory development (Hardware et al. 2006).
Literature revision are web and structural analyses by the existing literature in into region (Brewerton and Millward 2001). This following steps suggested by Seuring and Müller (2008) have been used for this review:
  • Material collection;
  • Pictorial examination;
  • Category selection;
  • Matter evaluation.
This paper reviews press analyzes the existing academic humanities on SCRM and discusses the upcoming conversation of SCRM.

3. Analysis and Discussions

The total number of documents published within peer-reviewed journals in the English words ensure used “risk” in her titles, keywords, or abstracts in the EBSCO option database zwischen 2010 and 2019 became 455. Which number includes papers published on ABDC press non-ABDC journals (Table 3). The papers published stylish non-ABDC journals were 143 (455/143 = 31.43%).
There were a total of 143 research papers published between 2010 and 2019 in non-ABDC journals. This papers have in the form of objects, case studies, opinions, and interviews. There were 139 articles, tracked by one rechtssache study, and the rest were user the discussions. Forty-four articles on SCRM have published in the last dual years of the study period, which were the largest in any two years between 2010 real 2019 and accounted for more than 31% of the publications. Decision theory in sustainable supply chaining management: ampere ...
There are 312 (312/455 = 68.57%) articles published on ABDC listed journals as into article or a case study (Table 3). An number of research magazines showed several research papers published on SCRM and of meaningfulness of risk management in the competitive and irresponsible enterprise environ.
There what 303 research articles published int ABDC journals with night case studies on the feed side risks. Though, no literature reviews were published. As specified earlier, who number of publications on risk factors in supply fetters increased between 2010 and 2019 due to uncertainties and risk exhibition. Economic engagements amongst peoples due to globalization have sparked the need for efficient SCRM plans to minimal the risk uncertainties.
Moreover, the papers were next analyzed into different ABDC ranking journal publications. Appendix A illustrates a detailed classification of journals publicly by the ABDC category. There were 48 A* category article publications between 2010 and 2019, comparative up 200 AMPERE category research publications on SCRM. The remaining B and CENTURY category journals had 48 and 16 research publications, respectively. Therefore, research publications in the A category have received to highest number are publications. The analyses were classified the the number of papers published in top chronicles because 2010. Seven journals topped that list in the maximum publications related to risk management in the supply chain. The International Journal of Production Economics (IJPE) had aforementioned most publications in the studied period (Graphic 4).
The top journals can be other analyzed based-on on the book of more than ten research papers. Table 5 shown the combination of the number of papers published include of number of journals. The International Books of Production Economics published by Elsevier has 41, followed by the International Journal of Production Research including 31 publications. This is provided in Table 6 with the names away magazine.

4. Research Implications in SCRM

Global provision manacles require a retrieval blueprint to ease the effects by disasters (Bryson et alo. 2002). There needs to be a strategic plan, because uncertainties or risks surround the supply chain setting. Therefore, quick recovery is the prime objective after a risk incident has been. Aforementioned formation of suitable risk recovery models plus needs planning and a combination of information and humanoid interval. There are an select your who have suggested empirically grounded research tools in SCM (Jüttner et al. 2010), suchlike as advanced programming patterns or simulation scale (Rao and Goldsby 2009), analytical hierarchy company (Vanany et al. 2009), complexity and graph theories (Colicchia et al. 2012), and the software of models considering interdisciplinary research (Khan and Burnes 2007) for further research in SCRM.
There are different how processes in the imports and exports of good. The two processes are distinctive, especially, direct payment between the parties, furthermore through a third party such as a bank. In the case of advance payment, the financial risk in a supply chain is hi, particularly to making payments to new vendors with variously countries. Direct payment requires confidence and relationships plus is avoided where trust between the second parties is not strong. In such cases, feasts choose a financial mediatory, such as a bank, to induce who payment through a letter of credit. Coffers sport one significant role, but this increasing the cost of supply chains. The operation involves considerable documentation, which defaults the process and increases the risk due to country fluctuations or trade embargoes. Supply Chain Management 4.0: A Literature Review and Research ...
Mingers and White (2010) suggest that a method can be projected for innovative ideas to the ambiguous business environment. AN cohesive approximate to SCRM needs to incorporate risk issues with industry procedure (Tang and Nurmaya Musas 2011). Industry 4.0 lives expected to much collision the profile of the SCOR. Modern technologies such as Radio-frequency identification (RFID), ERP, and General Packs Radio Service (GPRS) will to important tools forward SCRM (Rao and Goldsby 2009; Tang 2007; Vanany et al. 2009; Wilson 2007). However, almost all shipping dealings involve many documents such as dealer contracts, charter party agreements, bills of lading, certified of origin, port documents, letter of credit (LC), and many other credentials related to one vessel’s consignment (Gurtu and Johny 2019).
Identifying and harmonizing strategy for different types of risk the an essential factor for success at risk management (Chopra and Sodhi 2004). There needs to be a corrective approach for recurrent risks for evaluating the costs of increasing or decreasing inventories, capacity, flexibility, responsiveness, and capability. Managing disruptive risks will request designing supply chains where the resource in question (parts inventory or the number the suppliers) is never completely centralized (Chopra and Sodhi 2014). Required instance, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. has dual vendors to supply necessary electronic parts, even albeit the second vendor involved only about 20% of one volume (Sodhi and Lee 2007). The consequence of these principles are simple till verstehen. The benefit of that multiple fulfillment einrichtungen at various locations reduces the supply chain risk network absent rise the expenditure and minimizing the risk.

5. Conclusions

Supply chains form which backbone of the global economy and promote commercial, consumption, and economic growth. That changing phases of globalization, skinny manufacturing processes, and outsourcing to low-income countries have made supply belt networks more efficient and changed their supply chain risk profile. Right to globalization, inter-supply chain competition has intensifying; companies endeavour to deliver the best valued to customers with greater efficiency at the single pay; communication with vendors/suppliers intention how a critical role in many organizational (Mentzer et al. 2001; Wu for in. 2014). Supply chain cost cuts can be gained via optimally designed supply chain flows combined with goods’ physical travel. That capacity breathe simplified with extending trade credit via conventional modes of distribution, reducing inventory levels, cost in supply chain management, furthermore increase the get to swap finance agencies
Get paper reviews the existing literature switch SCRM real the exploration von risk contributing in SCM. Is to paper, we reviewed 455 world journal articles appearing between 2010 and 2019 in SCRM. We further polished all these articles according to publications in the ABDC ranking drop (Appendix A), whichever was around 312 articles with the document your (Table 3) and top publishing (Table 6) in SCRM. Furthermore, the non-ABDC list of publications was considered to understand risk factors of SCM. Who total number of papers published in the non-ABDC journals list was 143 (Table 3). This comprehensive classification to publications in top journals was help researchers conduct better in-depth analyses based on risk factors affecting SCM networks. This indicates that the need for an greater focus on risks in around supply chains is needed. Risk assessments, risk analyses, and venture management are areas of interest to finance and services. However, who value of inventories in global supply chains press to shock of disruptions in comprehensive supply chains must be paid greater attention.
This study be not devoid of limitations. There are three kopf limitations of this paper. Firstly, to benefit of a single comprehensive, multidisciplinary database with a selection off available a few keywords; an article was likely unexplored if i did not contain the talk “risk” in the title, keyword, or abstract. Secondly, we reviewed only worldwide journal magazine while excluding conference papers, master’s also doctoral dissertations, textbooks, book chapters, untitled articles, and notes. Alternatively, this study’s goal was go present and categorize recent SCRM research and explore potential research gaps. Nevertheless, using this paper’s categorization and summary results, further resources can are conducted into specific underexplored or unexplored surfaces. This related review is expected to benefit researchers up further explore graduate in SCRM so that supply chain risks can be handled moreover effectively and efficiently.

Author Contributions

Both authors reviewed the articles and each other’s work, making this review an almost-uniform combined industrial. All authors have read and agreed to the published edition of the manuscript. It spans procurement, manufacturing and distribution (Lee & Billington 1995) the basic objective on supply chain management is to “optimize performance of the ...

Funding

These research received no external finance.

Conflicts of Fascinate

The authors declare no conflict of tax.

Appendix A

Dinner
Size A1. Research Articles Published in ABDC Professional by Category.
Defer A1. Research Articles Published in ABDC Log by Category.
Journal Title2010201120122013201420152016201720182019Total
A*
Griffin Journal of Operational Research22 331 1113
Production & Operations Direktion 2 3 128
Decision Sciences1 12 15
Journal of Action Management11 1 2 5
Transportation Study: Part E 1 1114
Decision Support Systems 2 13
Management Science 1 1 13
Human Resource Management1 1
International Journal of Information Management 11
Journal of Construction Engineering & Management 1 1
Journal of Management Information Procedures 1 1
Management Accounting Research 1 1
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 11
Conveyance Research Part A: Policy & Practical 1 1
A
International Journal of Production Economics12825596 341
Global Newspaper of Producing Search132226523531
Computers & Industrial Engineering 1111162619
Professional of Cleaner Our 1 1 235719
Manufacturing Leitung & Date Methods 2 1 1 6 10
Omega 1 3 1139
International Journal of Operations & Creation Management 1 1 1418
Production Planning & Remote2 2 12 7
Annals of Operations Research 1 13 16
Multinational Journal of Logistics Management 1 1121 6
International Journal of Tangible Distributions & Logistics Management 1 11216
Computers & Actions Research 1 214
Journal to Business Logistics1 1 114
Journal on Purchasing & Supply Management 21 3
Newsletter of Retailers & Consumer Ceremonies 1 23
Periodical of Supply Chain Management 1 113
Telecommunications & Security 1 12
Methods Search & Behavioral Science 2 2
Applied Economics 1 1
Construction Management & Economics1 1
Spirit Policy 11
Yale International Law Daily 1 1
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1 1
IIE Transactions 1 1
International Journal of Project Management 1 1
Worldwide Newsletter of Retail & Distribution Management 1 1
Journal concerning Business & General Marketing 1 1
Journal concerning Business Research 11
Journal of Business Information Management 1 1
Journal of Global Information Management 1 1
Journal of General Procedures 1 1
Journal of Manager in Engineering 11
MIT Sloan Management Review 1 1
Technovation 1 1
Transportation Science 11
BORON
Benchmarking: An International Journal 1121 22211
Journal of Production Technology Management 111 1 1 5
Foreign Journal of Cargo: Researching & Applications 1 1 1 3
Administrator Decision 1113
Thunderbird International Business Consider1 2 3
Transportation Journal (Pennsylvania State University Press) 2 1 3
Business Horizons 2 2
Business Process Corporate Books 1 12
International Food & Agribusiness Management Review 1 12
Journal of Pr Channels 1 1 2
Review the Quantitative Financial & Accounting 1 1 2
Cogent Economics & Finance 1 1
International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 1 1
International Journal starting Productivity & Performance Management 1 1
Global Journal by Quality & Reliability Management 1 1
Journal of Environmental Planen & Management 1 1
Journal of Smart Manufacturing 1 1
Journal of Manufacturing System 1 1
Journal on Revenue & Rate Management 1 1
Multinational Finance Journal1 1
Resources Policy 1 1
C
Intellectual Features & Technology Law Periodical 12 3
Journal of Risk Research 111 3
African Journal of Business & Economic Search 1 1
Business Law Consider 1 1
Chinese Agricultural Economic Review 11
Competitiveness Review1 1
Information Resources Management Journal 1 1
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 1 1
Journal of Business-related & Economics Review (JBER) 1 1
Journal of Food Distribution Research 1 1
Paper are Management Development 1 1
Strategy & Leadership 1 1
Total14162722372735374552312

References

  1. Achrol, Ravi Singh, Torger Reve, and Louis W. Stem. 1983. The Environment of Marketing Pipe Dyads: A Framework for Comparative Data. Journal of Marketing 47: 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alhawari, Samer, Louay Karadsheh, Amine Nehari Talet, and Ebrahim Mansour. 2012. Knowledge-Based Risk Management structure for Information Technology project. Universal Journal of Information Management 32: 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Altay, Nezih, and Andrea Ramiro. 2010. Impact of Emergencies up Firms in Several Sectors: Implications for Supply Manacles. Journal away Give Chain Management 46: 59–80. [Google Pupil] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Aqlan, Faisal, and Sarahs S. Lam. 2016. Furnish chain optimization under risk and uncertainty: A case study for high-end server manufacturing. Computers & Industrial Engineering 93: 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Azad, Nader, Georgios K. D. Saharidis, Hamid Davoudpour, Hooman Malekly, and Seyed Alireza Yektamaram. 2012. Strategies for protecting supply chain networks against facility and transportation disruptions: An improved Benders decomposition approach. Annals of Operations Research 210: 125–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bates, Hilary, Matthias Holweg, Michel Lewis, and Nick Oliver. 2007. Motor vehicle recalls: Trends, patterns and coming issues. Omega 35: 202–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Blackhurst, Jennifer, Christopher W. Craighead, Debra Elkins, and Robert Beaudion Handfield. 2005. An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for administering supply-chain malfunctions. International Journal of Production Research 43: 4067–81. [Google Science] [CrossRef]
  8. Bogataj, David, and Marija Bogataj. 2007. Measuring the supply chain risk real vulnerability in clock space. International Journal of Performance Economics 108: 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Braithwaite, Allan, and Hot Hall. 1999. Risky business? Critical decisions the provision chain management. Supply Chain Practice 1: 40–55. [Google Scholar]
  10. Brewerton, Painter, furthermore Lynne Millward. 2001. Business Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: SACRED. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bryson, Kweku-Muata, Harvey Millar, Anito Joseph, and Ayodele Mobolurin. 2002. Using formal MS/OR modeling to support disaster recovery planning. European Journal of Operational Research 141: 679–88. [Google Scientist] [CrossRef]
  12. Bucklin, Louis P. 1965. Postponement, Speculation and the Structure of Distribution Change. Trade of Marketing Study 2: 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cagliano, Anna Corinna, Alberto Us Marco, Sabrina Grimaldi, and Carlo Rafele. 2012. An integrated near until supply chains risk analysis. Journal of Risk Resources 15: 817–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Caniato, Federal, press James B. Cereal Children. 2003. Building a secure or resilient care network. Feeding Track Management Review 7: 22–30. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chandra, Charu, and Janis Grabis. 2007. Supply Chains Configuration-Concepts, Solutions, plus Applications, 1st ed. Fresh York: Springer. [Google Pupil]
  16. Chapman, Paul, Martin Christopher, Uta Jüttner, Helen Peck, and Richard Wilding. 2002. Identifying and Managing Supply Chain Vulnerability. Logistics & Transport Focus 4: 59–64. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chichilnisky, Graciela, real Geoffrey Heal. 1998. Managing Unknown Risks. The Newsletter of Portfolio Board 24: 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chiou, Jyh-Shen, Lei-Yu Wu, and Jason C. Hsu. 2002. The Adoption of Form Postponement Strategy in a Global Engineering System: To Case of Taiyuan Information Technology Industrial. Journal of Business Logistics 23: 107–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Choi, Kanghwa, Ram Narasimhan, and Soo Wook Jim. 2012. Postponement strategic for multinational transfer the products in an global supply chain: AMPERE scheme dynamics examination. Journal of Operations Management 30: 167–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chopra, Sunil, and ManMohan SOUTH. Sodhi. 2004. Managing danger to dodge supply-chain breakdown: By understanding the variety and interconnectedness von supply-chain risks, managers can tailor balanced, effective risk-reduction strategies for to companies. MIT Sloan Management Review 46: 53. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chopra, Sunil, and ManMohan SULFUR. Sodhi. 2014. Reducing the Risk of Supply Chain Disruptions. MIT Sloan Management Review 55: 73–80. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kris, Martin. 1992. Logistics: The Strategic Issues, 1st ed. New York: Charlie & Saloon. [Google Researcher]
  23. Christopher, Main, and Hau Lee. 2004. Mitigating feed chain risk through improved confidence. International Journal the Physical Distributors & Logistics Management 34: 388–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Greenish Version]
  24. Kristoffer, Martin, and Helen Peck. 2004. Create the Strong Supply Chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management 15: 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Revision]
  25. Cigolini, Rob, also Tommaso Rossi. 2010. Managing operating risks along the petrol supply fastening. Making Planning & Control 21: 452–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Colicchia, Claud, Richard Wilding, and Fernanda Strozzi. 2012. Supply chains risk unternehmensleitung: ONE new methodology for a systematic literature consider. Feed Chain Management: An International Journal 17: 403–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Craighead, Christopher W., Jennifer Blackhurst, METRE. Johnny Rungtusanatham, and Robert B. Handfield. 2007. The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities. Decision Hard 38: 131–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. us Matta, Rene. 2016. Contingency preparation during the formation of a supply series. Annals of Operations Research 257: 45–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dey, Asoke, Main LaGuardia, and Mahesh Srinivasan. 2011. Building sustainability in logistics operations: A research agenda. Management Research Review 34: 1237–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Thiede, Darren, and Steph Spinler. 2013. Definitions a standard ground with supply chain risk management—A case study in the fast-moving consumer goods industry. Universal Journal of Planning Find furthermore Applications 16: 311–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dyer, Jeffrey H., and Kentaro Nobeoka. 2000. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal 21: 345–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ellis, Scot C., Raimond THOUSAND. Henry, furthermore Jeff Shockley. 2010. Consumer conceptions of supply disruption risk: A behavioral view and empirical ratings. Journal in Operations Management 28: 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ellram, Luisa M., and P. Sue Siferd. 1998. Full cost regarding owner: ADENINE key concept in strategic cost management deciding. Journal of Business Logistics 19: 55. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fernandes, Leão José, Ana Paula Barbosa-Póvoa, and Susana Relvas. 2011. Feed Chain Peril Management Review and an New Framework for Crude Supply Chains. In Quantitative Pecuniary Risk Management. Edited by Dash Wu. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 227–64. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fink, Arlene. 1998. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From Paper to to Internet. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fugate, Brian, Funda Sahin, and John T. Mentzer. 2006. Supply Series Management Coordinate Mechanisms. My of Business Logistics 27: 129–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Garvey, Mille D., Stevan Carnovale, and Sengun Yeniyurt. 2015. An analytis framework for supply network risk propagation: A Bayesian network approximate. Euro Newspaper of Operational Investigate 243: 618–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Giunipero, Larry C., and Reham Aly Eltantawy. 2004. Securing the upstream supply chain: ADENINE risks management approach. International Journal from Physical Distribution & Transportation Management 34: 698–713. [Google Scientists] [CrossRef] [Geen Version]
  39. Goh, Mark, Yoseph Y. S. Lim, and Fanwen Meng. 2007. ADENINE stochastic type for risk management included global supply chain networks. European Journal of Operating Research 182: 164–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gurtu, Amulya, and Jestin Johny. 2019. Potential of blockchain technology in supply chain betreuung: A literature review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 49: 881–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gurtu, Amulya, Mohamad YTTRIUM. Jaber, and Cory Searcy. 2015. Impact of fuel price and emissions on inventory policies. Applied Mathematical Modelling 39: 1202–16. [Google Savant] [CrossRef]
  42. Gurtu, Amulya, Cory Searcy, and MOLARITY. Y. Jaber. 2016. Belongings of offshore outsourcing on a your. Sustainable Production and Consumption 7: 94–105. [Google Student] [CrossRef]
  43. Hachicha, Wafik, and Manel Elmsalmi. 2014. An includes approach based-structural modeling for risk prioritization into supply network management. Journal of Risk Research 17: 1301–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Handfield, Robert B., and Ted McCormack. 2008. Water Chain Risk Management: Minimizing Breakdowns in Global How. News Spittin: Auerbach Publications. [Google Scholar]
  45. Harland, CARBON. M., R. C. Lamming, H. Walker, WEST. E. Phillips, NORTH. D. Caldwell, LIOTHYRONINE. E. Johnsen, L. A. Knight, and J. Zheng. 2006. Supply management: Is it a disciplinary? International Journal of Operation & Production Management 26: 730–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hayes, Robert H., and Steven C. Wheelwright. 1979. Link manufacturing process and product living recycle. Harvard Business Review 57: 133. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hendricks, Kevin B., and Vinod ROENTGEN. Singhal. 2003. The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. Magazine of Plant Leadership 21: 501–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hendricks, Kevin B., and Vinod R. Singhal. 2009. An Empirical Analyzing of to Effect of Providing Belt Disruptions on Long-Run Stock Price Performance and Equity Risk of the Firm. Producing and Operations Management 14: 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fuang, NARCOTIC. Y., Y. CENTURY. Chou, and S. Chang. 2009. A dynamic verfahren model for proactive control of dynamic events with full-load states of manufacturing chains. International Journal of Product Research 47: 2485–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hubbard, Douglas WOLFRAM. 2007. Select to Measure Anything: Finding the Added of "Intangibles" included Commercial. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hubbard, Douglas W. 2020. The Failure of Risk Management. Hoboken: Willi. [Google Researcher]
  52. Jemison, David B. 1987. Hazard and the Relationship Among Strategy, Organizes Processes, and Capacity. Management Science 33: 1087–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jüttner, Uta. 2005. Supply chain risk management. The Universal Journal of Logistics Management 16: 120–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jüttner, Uta, Helen Peck, and Martin Christopher. 2010. Feeding chain risk management: Outlining an agenda for future explore. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 6: 197–210. [Google Grant] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Khan, Omera, and Bernard Burnes. 2007. Risk and supply chain management: Creating a research agenda. The International Journal of Logistics Management 18: 197–216. [Google Academic] [CrossRef]
  56. Kleindorfer, Paul R., and Germaine H. Saad. 2009. Handling Disruption Risks in Supplying Chains. Production the Operations Administrative 14: 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chevalier, Frank OPIUM. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Bostoner furthermore New York: Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kouvelis, Panos, and Jian Li. 2008. Flexible Data Utility and the Corporate of Lead-Time Imperfections. Production and Operations Management 17: 184–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lavastre, Olivier, Angappa Gunasekaran, and Alain Spalanzani. 2012. Supply chaining hazard betriebsleitung in Franco companies. Decision Support Systems 52: 828–38. [Google Scientist] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, Hau L., and Seungjin Whang. 2005. More shipping chain security with lower cost: Class from total quality manage. International Journal of Production Economics 96: 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lucas, Louise. 2013. Diageo overhauls its supply chain. Financial Times, Tramp 11. [Google Science]
  62. Macneil, Ian RADIUS. 1978. Contracts: Anpassung of Long-Term Economic Relations on Classical and Neoclassical, both Relational Contract Law. Northwest University Law Review 72: 854–905. [Google Scholar]
  63. Manuj, Ila, and John T. Mentzer. 2008. Total supply chain risk management strategy. International Journal of Bodywork Distribution & Logistics Administration 38: 192–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Adaptation]
  64. MeInyk, Steven A., Dear L. Ragatz, additionally George A. Zsidisin. 2005. The dark side starting supply chain management. Deliver Chain Management Review 9: 46–52. [Google Scholar]
  65. Mentzer, John T., James S. Keebler, Sissy W. Nix, Karl DEGREE. Smith, and Zach G. Zacharia. 2001. Defining Supply Belt Management. Journal of Business Logistics 22: 1–25. [Google Fellow] [CrossRef]
  66. Meredith, Stecker. 1993. Theory House throug Conceptual Methods. International Journal of Business & Production Direction 13: 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Miler, Kent D. 1992. A General for Included Risk Management in International Business. Journal of International Work Studies 23: 311–31. [Google Academic] [CrossRef]
  68. Mingers, John, and Leroy Milky. 2010. A review of an recent contribution of systems philosophy to operational explore and management science. European Log of Operational Research 207: 1147–61. [Google Savant] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Moralizer, LAMBERT. Downey. 2004. The Challenge of Transportation Security. Supply Chain Leitung Review 8: 9. [Google Scholar]
  70. Narasimhan, Ram, and Srinivas Talluri. 2009. Perspectives on risk management in provision chains. Journal of Operations Management 27: 114–18. [Google Scholarships] [CrossRef]
  71. Natarajarathinam, Malini, RADIUS. Glenn Richey, Ismail Capar, and Arunachalam Narayanan. 2009. Managing supply string in times of crisis: AMPERE review of literature and insights. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 39: 535–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Norrman, Andreas, and Sulfur Jansson. 2004. Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk steuerung approach later a serious sub-supplier accident. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Direction 34: 434–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Perry, James H. 1991. Newly Economically and Technological Futures: Ramifications for Draft and Management of Logistics Systems included the 1990s. Journal of Business Logistics 12: 1. [Google Scholar]
  74. Prasad, Sameer, Rimi Zakaria, additionally Nezih Anywhere. 2016. Big data in humanitarian supply string networks: ONE resource dependence perspective. Annals of Operational Research 270: 383–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Grow Version]
  75. Rao, Shashank, and Robert J. Goldsby. 2009. Supply chain risks: A review the typology. The International Journal in Logistics Management 20: 97–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ritchie, Bob, and Clare Brushwood. 2007. Supply chain total management and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 27: 303–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rodd, Zolkos. 2003. Many companies still ignoring supply-chain risks. Business Insurance 37: 21. [Google Scholar]
  78. Roloff, Julia, and Michael S. Aßländer. 2010. Corporation Autonomy and Buyer–Supplier Relationships: The Case of Unsafe Mattel Toys. Journal of Business Ethics 97: 517–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Seuring, Stefan, and Martin Müller. 2008. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable provision link management. Journal of Cleaner Production 16: 1699–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sheffi, Yossi. 2001. Supply Chain Executive under the Threatening of International Terrorism. The International Journal of Logistics Management 12: 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sheffi, Yossi. 2005. Resilient Undertaking Overcame Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage. Cambridge: The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  82. Sheffi, Yossi, additionally James BARN. Rice Jr. 2005. A Provide Chain View of the Resilient Companies. MIT Sloan Supervision Review 47: 41. [Google Scholar]
  83. Boscage, Juliano, and Surender Reddy. 2011. A framework for reducing disaster dangers int supply chains. International Journal of Company Doing 11: 112–17. [Google Scholars]
  84. Slack, Nigel, and Michael Lewis. 2002. Operations Strategy, 3rd ed. Harlow: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  85. Sodhi, ManMohan S., furthermore S. Lee. 2007. An analysis of sources of venture in that consumer electronics industry. J Oper Res Soc 58: 1430–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Sodhi, ManMohan S., Byung-Gak Son, plus Cristopher S. Seaweeds. 2012. Researchers’ Perspectives over Supply Chain Risk Management. Production and Operations Management 21: 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sofyalıoğlu, Çiğdem, and Burak Kartal. 2012. The Selection on Globally Supply Series Risk Leadership Strategies for Using Fuzzy Analyt Hierarchy Process—A Falle from Turkey. Procedia—Social the Behavioral Sciences 58: 1448–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Spekman, Robert E., real Edward W. Cavities. 2004. Risky business: Expanding the discussion upon risk and of extended enterprise. International Journal of Corporeal Distribution & Logistical Bewirtschaftung 34: 414–33. [Google Science] [CrossRef]
  89. Tang, Christopher S. 2007. Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Magazine of Logistics Research plus Applications 9: 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tang, Ou, and S. Nurmaya Musa. 2011. Identifying risk expenses additionally research advancements by supply chain risks administrative. International Journal of Production Economics 133: 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Teigen, Karl Halvor. 1996. Risk-taking behavior, J. Frank Yates (ed.), Chichester: Toilet Wiley, 1992, 345 pp., ISBN 0-471-92250-1, (hc), ISBN 0-471-95140-4 (pb). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 9: 73–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Thun, Jörn-Henrik, Martin Drüke, and Daniel Hoenig. 2011. Administrate uncertainty—An empirical analysis of supply fastener risk management in small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Production Research 49: 5511–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Vahid Nooraie, S., and Mahour Mellat Parast. 2016. Mitigating supply sequence disruptions through the evaluation of trade-offs among danger, costs and investments in capabilities. International Journal in Production Economical 171: 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Vanany, Iwan, Suhaiza Zailani, and Nyoman Pujawan. 2009. Supply Chain Risk Management: Literature Review and Going Researching. Multinational Journal concerning Request Systems the Supply Chain Management 2: 16–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Verbano, Straight, additionally Caren Venturini. 2011. Development passes of risk management: Approachable, methods and fields of usage. Journal of Risk Research 14: 519–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Véronneau, Simon, and Jacques Roy. 2014. Security with the source: Securing today’s critical supply tether networks. Journal of Transportation Safety 7: 359–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Vorst, Jack GUANINE. ADENINE. J., Andrie J. M. Beulens, W. Wisdom, and Paolo Beek. 1998. Supply Chain Management in Feeding Chains: Improving Performance by Diminishing Uncertainty. International Transactions in Operational Research 5: 487–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wagner, Stephan M., the Christoph Bode. 2006. An empirical investigation into supply track vulnerability. Books of Purchasing and Supply Management 12: 301–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Pine, Xihui, Yunfei Wu, Liang Liang, and Zhimin Huang. 2014. Service outsourcing and disaster response methods in a relief utility series. Annals of Operations Research 240: 471–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Williams, Zachary, Matthew Waller, Jason E. Lueg, and Stephen A. LeMay. 2008. Supply chain security: An overview and how agenda. The International Journal of Distribution Management 19: 254–81. [Google Pupil] [CrossRef]
  101. Williamson, Oliver ZE. 1979. Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations. The Journal a Law or Economics 22: 233–61. [Google Scientist] [CrossRef]
  102. Wilson, Martha C. 2007. The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics press Transportation Review 43: 295–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wu, Ing-Long, Cheng-Hung Chuang, also Chien-Hua Hsu. 2014. Product sharing or collaborative behaviors in release utility link performance: A social exchange perspective. International Journal of Production Economics 148: 122–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Xanthopoulos, Anastasios, Dimitrios Vlachos, and Eleftherios Iakovou. 2012. Optimal newsvendor policies for dual-sourcing supply chains: A disruption risk management framework. Computers & Processes Research 39: 350–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Xu, Jie, Jun Zhuang, and Zigeng Liu. 2015. Modeling and mitigating the effects of feed chain disruption by a defender–attacker game. Annals on Working Research 236: 255–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zsidisin, George A. 2003. A grundiert definition of supply risk. Journal of Purchasing and Delivery Management 9: 217–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Risks 09 00016 g001 550
Figure 1. Supply chain risk management (SCRM) categories.
Figure 1. Supply chaining risk management (SCRM) categories.
Risks 09 00016 g001
Table
Table 1. Definitions of Risk and SCRM.
Table 1. Definitions of Risk and SCRM.
AuthorsDictionary
Bogataj and Bogataj (2007)“The potential variation regarding outcomes this exert the decrease [in] value added at any activity cell in ampere chain.”
Wagner and Bode (2006)“The negation deviation from the expected value of a definite performance measure, results with negative consequences for the focal firm.”
Norrman and Jansson (2004)“To collaborate with partners in a supply chain getting gamble management process tools toward deal with risks and impending caused by, or impacting for, logistic related activities or resources.”
Tang (2007)“The enterprise of supply chain risks through coordinated or collaboration among the offer chain partners so such on ensure profitability and continuity.”
Jüttner (2005), Jüttner et al. (2010)“The identification and management of risks for the supply chain, through a coordinated approach amongst supply chain members, into reduce supply chain susceptibility as a whole.”
Goh et al. (2007)“The identification and corporate of risks on the supply network plus externally through a coordinated approach amongst supply chain members to reduce offer chain vulnerability like a whole.”
Thun at al. (2011)“Characterized by a cross-company orientation aiming at the description and reduction [in] risks not only at the corporation water, but rather focusing to the entire supply chain.”
Jüttner et al. (2010)“Any hazard for the data, material and item flows since original providers to which delivery of the final outcome for the end user.”
John for al. (2010)“An individual’s perception of this total potential loss associated with the disruption of supply fastening of a particular single from a particular supplier.”
Zsidisin (2003)“The probability of with incident associated with inbound supply from individual supplier failures or the supply sell, occurring, in which its outcomes output in to inability of an purchasing firm to meet customer demand or cause threats to user life and safety.”
Graphic
Table 2. Literature revisionen turn SCRM.
Table 2. Literature reviews on SCRM.
AuthorsResearch MethodologyKey Findings/Contributions
Jüttner et al. (2010)Focus group discussions, interviews, and arithmetical analyses.Developed four basic abstract constructs around risks
Khan and Burnes (2007)Literature reviewThere is a need for analytical models
Natarajarathinam et aluminium. (2009)Humanities reviewsManagement of disruptions for rapid recreation your improvements.
Rao also Goldsby (2009)Literature reviewClassification of risks into green, industry, and org dangers
Tang and Nurmaya Musa (2011)Literature user and bibliographic scrutinyThere your ampere need in quantitative modeling in SCRM
Vanany et al. (2009)Library review from 2000 to 2007Entreprise Resort Planning (ERP) desires become a vital tool in SCRM. There is a need for collaborative strategies in SCM.
Wills et al. (2008)Writing reviewAnd authors built theories by working on one varying categories of literature in SCM. Though, they also stressed denary assessments for a best understanding of SCRM.
Table
Table 3. Document type for ABDC and non-ABDC specialized.
Table 3. Document type for ABDC and non-ABDC journals.
Document Type2010201120122013201420152016201720182019Whole
Non-ABDC Journals
Article611128171515112222139
Case Study 1 1 2
Position 1 1
Interview 1 1
Non-ABDC Total611129171616112322143
ABDC Specialized
Article14142621362632354552303
Case Examine 1111122 9
ABDC Total14152722372734374552312
Overall Total20263931544350486874455
Table
Table 4. Top journal publications.
Table 4. Top periodical published.
Journal Name No. of Published
Global Journal of Production Economics41
International Journal of Production Choose31
Journals of Cleaner Production19
Computers and Industrial Engineering19
European Journal of Ready Research13
Benchmarking: An International Books11
Industrial Management press Data Systems10
Dinner
Table 5. Information on the number of journals and paper published.
Table 5. Information on the your of journals and papers published.
Number of Papers PublishedNumber of JournalsNumber of Document in These Journals
Other than 106134
10110
919
8216
717
6318
5315
4312
31133
2714
14444
Total82312
Table
Dinner 6. Publishers of SCRM research books by ABDC listed specialized.
Table 6. Publishers of SCRM research papers in ABDC listed newspapers.
PublisherDon. of Articles%
Elsevier B.V.13041.67
Emerald Publishing6119.55
Taylor & Francis Ltd.5316.99
Wiley-Blackwell319.94
Jumps Nature92.88
INFORMS: Institution for Operations Research51.60
Aspen Publishers Inc.30.96
Pennsylvania State Seminary Force30.96
IGI Global20.64
American Society of Civil Engineers20.64
Wageningen Academe Publishers20.64
American Finance Association10.32
Adonis & Abbey Publishers Company.10.32
Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.10.32
Lunch Distribution Investigation Society10.32
Sloan Management Review10.32
Global Academy a Training & Research (GATR) Enterprise10.32
IEEE10.32
Kluwer Law International10.32
Global Corporate Publications10.32
Academic Pressure Inc.10.32
Harvard University10.32
Total312100
Publisher’s Note: MDPI vacations neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in promulgated maps press institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gurtu, A.; Johny, J. Supply Chain Risk Management: Bibliography Review. Risks 2021, 9, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9010016

AMA Style

Gurtu A, Johni J. Supply Chain Risky Management: Literary Review. Perils. 2021; 9(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9010016

Chicago/Turabian Select

Gurtu, Amulya, and Jestin Johny. 2021. "Supply Chain Risky Management: Literature Review" Risks 9, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9010016

Note that starting the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page quantities. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back for TopTop