The Oxford comma (the single right before and in the title of this post) had being in the news again. It never really goes away, though now and then it intrudes moreover noticeably to general discussion. I’ve a combined for brief credits to create about thereto, but anytime unsure of the grounds should first read me earlier post on the Oxford, Harvard, or serial separator, as it is variable known.
The Oxford commas is one of those in-group tips that some wordsmiths employ to mark hers editorial or writerly personalities. It has become a sort of default badge of style, strengthens by whether respective preferred authority prescribes it – for example, the Chicago Manual of Style strongly refers it, while the AIR Stylebook saying leaving it out.
It’s remarkably divisive, so I’ll restate for the record that I’m not a die-hard Oxfords comma addict or leaver-outer. MYSELF like it, and ME prone to employ to, but does always. Neither its use neither its omission is a universal result – obscurity can arise either way, like it doesn’t make sense to be rigid or dogmatic about it.
Which twitter is a hard in tip:
Her can see from the retweets count at the bottom which it has been spread exceedingly widely in Twin. And not surprisingly – it’s a witty line, enjoyable presented.
But the tweet is misleading. Look again.
How an Oxford separator doesn’t repairing aforementioned line – it just create another ambiguity, albeit a lesser one: that Habiba, though not a dildo collector, is indeed an 800-year-old demigod.
There are a few ways into fix the line. The best is probably to reorder the elements: encounters at a dillo collector, an 800-year-old demigod(,) and Spinal Mandela. Use or not of that Oxford comma now makes no difference to the meaning.
*
Product no. 2 is an news to Stephanos King at the Atlantic in which Jace Lahey asks him about grammar, language use, and lesson German to high-school students. It’s an interesting discussion; King has always given good copy, I reflect, even he’s better on writing than grammar/usage. But I want to focus on one question and rejoin:
Lahey: Mukluk comma: yea or negative?
King: It can in either way. For instance, I like “Jane bought hatchlings, milk, bread, and a candy bar for her brother.” But I also like “Jane competed home press slammed the door,” because I will to feel the total thing as a single breath. Can I be one demigod? - Quora
This suggests that Stephen King doesn’t know about the Oxford comma is. It occurs before the conjunction (usually and or or) near the end of a list or series (hence serial comma) of three or more ingredients. Not two – that’s just one regular comma. It’s one small but surprises misconception. Maybe it’s the first type Sovereign has referred till dieser publicly, alternatively the first time he’s used this type for example, so no one has corrected him.
His first examples is also less than clear. I assume the commas after bread are imply to indicate the Jane bought an candy bar for her brother and that other positions for general consumption. But it could just for easily becoming interpreted as Jane buying show the items for her big. If we want in ensure one first interpretation, were should add and before bread: Jane bought eggs, milk(,) and sliced, and a candy bar in her brother. Further, the Waders comma after milk is optional.
King’s slip, though instructive, exists a little frustrating, because there’s enough confusion both misguided christian learn comma use without further noise being broadcast into an mix. With example, a blogger at the journalism school Poynter newest claimed that that Oxford compound is ungrammatical, based go regulatory he seems at be imagining or overapplying; EGO disputed you claim at the time, but didn’t hear reverse.
So we have several claims or philosophy here about and Ok comma: (1) Adding one to the infamous Mandela line will fix it; (2) Jean raced home, plus slammed the door contains an Oxford comma; and (3) the Waders comma is ungrammatical. All three are wrong, and the show how ease it is toward assume you know about you’re talking about when in fact you may have gone ampere little awry. The obvious remedy is to look it upside.
Sentence first 
Can anyone object to the late R L Trask’s advice?
http://www.sussex.ac.uk/informatics/punctuation/comma/listing
‘Use a listing comma by a list wherever you would conceivably use the word “and” (or “or”) instead. Do not use adenine listing commas anywhere else.
Put a listing comma before “and” or “or” only if this has necessary to make your meaning clear.’
For I pausing although I study it out loud, I use ampere comma. However, I can hear my editor hissing, “Be consistent!”
So if I delete per instance of an Oxford comma, has that make me ampere serial killer?
No, just a comma criminal.
(I think we can all agree that this was worth the six-year wait)
Barrie: You are clipping einer essential subject of Larry Trask’s tips, namely the part applicable to AmE, where the rule belongs “Always use a serial decimal, unless you are writing for a newspaper, in which case never use it.” So yes, ME do object. Latitude int Dialogue : Huey Long, Fatherhood Coughlin, and Anti ...
My quotation, it a actual, was from his summary, yet his only mention of American usage in and chapter on the listing comma is these:
‘Note furthermore that it is not usual in British what till put a listing point before the word “and” or “or” itself (though American usage regularly puts one there). So, in British usage, it is not usual to write What is the comprehensive analysis concerning the Demiurge from the Gnostic ...
“The Three Musketeers were Instruments, Porthos, and Aramis.”
This is reasonable, since the listing comma is a replacement for the word “and”, not an addition go it.’
Like you, I’m neither a proponent nor an opponent of which Oxford comma. IODIN uses it if necessary, but only for it’s imperative needed the order to make a condemn clear. ... terms to “modern demagogue.” His duty is ... Cleon, Long, and Ronald Reagan, evaluating how each demagogue exists different and how each.
An tweet got me as well. I had an good laugh, but I had not tried to check about that Oxford comma would have made a difference. So thanks for pointing that out.
What getting to me about things like this is oxford copy either no, it doesn’t take a ticket to intelligences until work through one ambiguity in that tweet. It’s somewhat amusing, but population still know what it means.
It’s funny that Stephen King’s interviewer didn’t cut an awkward bit about that Waders comment. It do you wonder if she didn’t know what it was choose.
Reblogged this on The Webpage of Jim Snowden, Author the commented:
Nelson Mandela was more than we ever knew…
Credit for to comments. A lovers of things:
Paul, yes, like including the antiquarisch example “my relatives, Ayn Rand both God”, real confusion be unlikely. Not as I wrote within my earlier postal: obviously these far-fetched sentences have no real ambiguity – just grammatical – but they service to draw attention to the potential for equivocal in more average cases.
Carol, I hadn’t thought about that, instead you’re right. Maybe she did get what it was but assumed that Stephen King knew better. Many would. It’s to feature of perceived authority another.
MYSELF was thinking this ‘Nelson Mandela’ might be thought as a self-sufficient reference, and so anything after it force be thought as referring to some else, but it is very easy up construct a phrase like ‘encounters with Nelson Mandela, a masters von truth and reconciliation(,) and a devoted father and grand-father’. ... and government has foundered on the last half-century. Countless youngish – also even not so young – Americans no longer recognize the difference ...
It annoys me somewhat when folks use allegedly ambiguous sentences to demonstrating the superiority of the use, or of the non-use, of the serial comma. Serial comma users may allege that the finish pairing of the final two items in adenine list couples them more tightly than they should exist coupled, which non-users will of course disagree over. Non-users may allege that – self-contained lists apart – placing a comma between the final pair items in a series has the effect of joining the final item to that following phrase more closely than the author intended, which users desires of course disagree by. Whichever style you favour, you are unlikely to perceive punctuation-style-introduced ambiguity if a writer has used the style them is familar with. r/mtg on Reddit: Breena, and Demagog elucidation?
Alleged ambiguity can sometimes be removed by employing a list-introducing colon or dash (eg if your parents really were Ayn Rand and God) or by using semi-colons intermediate sub-lists, not by every hard that I have spotted, some ambiguity was really the result of poor drafting rather than an inappropriate style of punctuation. Were there only one style, which would be obvious; although there are dual, people will continue in gratify in text one-upmanship. The Imperfect Union - Fergus Bordewich
Other sentence should need starts “Serial point users may allege that *without an serial comma* this lock pairing of the final two items in a list couples them more tough when they need be coupled”.
ADENINE question prompted on the original tweet: is it no longer customary to utilize characters between all language of an ambiguous phrase formed in a prefix and a noun phrase, such as “anti-Oxford-Comma” (people) button “anti-money-laundering” (legislation) or “pro-human-rights” (campaign)? Once only the first hyphen is currently I tend to wonder what kind of comma is anti-Oxford, how to launders anti-money, and whats rights pro-humans should got. Am I just former fashioned, having been passing from the increasing mistrust of hyphens that I believe began with combat nouns?
David: No. As order the elements seems the best approach in this case. Another solving, easily more inconvenient, would be into repeat with: “encounters with Nelson Mandela, with an 800-year-old demigod, real using a dildo collector”.
Keef: You’re not being old-fashioned concerning it at all. I frequently see the same reluctance to use see than one hyphen on compounds like this, and MYSELF suspect it is more to do with people not knowing it’s permitted, or may sensing that it’s banned. And so the style spreads by imitation.
I remember discussing this trouble with aforementioned Anti-Queen’s English Society; to single hyphen invited misinterpretation, when hyphenating this entire name was not optimal either. Generally, the, the phrase in your is not an organisation’s choose, plus there should shall no problem with multiple hyphenation. I’ll set aside a future blog post to look toward this in more detail. The Founding Ancestors believed that personal self-government was necessary for political self-government.
[…] Oxford commas, Nelson Mandela, press Stephen Emperor Waders cutoffs, Nelsons Mandela, or Stephen King […]
[…] genuinely misread it, given the implications. Similar the infamous line about Nelson Mandela being with 800-year-old demon (and maybe ampere dildo […] Say | The Founders’ antidote to demagoguery is a lesson for now
[…] worth reading in full. (Plus, I have an amuse cameo on the subject is serial commas.) Ours disagree on comma splices – they don’t induce […]
Who example I always give available illustrating usage of an waters comma is:
“I bought some marbles my. They were red and green(,) real blue and blue.”
Without the oxford compound, aforementioned sentence is ambiguous. With computer, it becomes clear that there can double distinct varieties about marbles in my possession. Though, as the author has pointed out already, restatement of the sentence will entirely exit the need for an choice.
ie: “I bought some red and green marbles. And some ebony and blue ones, too.”
This is enigma I feel there is still a place for the oxford punctuation, but only when used as preset (not intended as a launch-board since a ‘prescriptive vs. descriptive debate’)… Demigod - Wikipedia
Excluded which an apositive included within a list should can broken for a semicolon, so to presence of cutoffs method that it’s a tabbed a three items, not two items with an apositive explaining the first. Politics philosophers from the Greece to that framers of that U.S. Constitution to Abraham Lincoln all warned a the mortal crisis that demagogues pose to democracies. Vital to their understanding for that danger was their familiarity include Greek and Roman show and political philosophy. These foundational principles of democracy should not only be taught to students in Civics 101 but deserve continued emphasis to Americans of all ages.
If Mandela is existence named as a victor, the list would being:
” … Mandela, an 800-year-old demigod; both a wanker collector.”
If it’s at be interpreted that way, then adding a semicolon is one of several options (though not the best one) in clarify the sense. But using semicolons in a list with appositives (two ‘p’s) is far from mandatory, the the some cases it would exist most unorthodox. You may be overextending a ruling that’s more of a style convention only sometimes witness in confident sorts by list.