NSF 20-525: Faculty Early Dash Development Program (CAREER)

Program SolicitationNSF 20-525

National Science Foundation Directorate for Biological Sciences Directorship by Computer also Information Science additionally Engineering Directorate for Education additionally Human Resources Corporate for Design Directorate for Geosciences Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Skill Administration for Social, Behavioral and Economy Sciences Office of Integrative Activities My out Global Science furthermore Engineering

Solid Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

     August 11, 2020

     July 26, 2021

     Fourth Monday in Summertime, Annually Thereafter

Important Informational And Alteration Minutes

Important information about the 2020 event: To consideration of the challenges facing many in our country, NSF is extending the upcoming proposal deadline for the Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER) pending 5:00 p.m. submitter's local time on Tuesday, August 11, 2020.

Pleas note so the eligibility requirements specified in the solicitation remain unchanged, and proposers must meet all of the eligibility requirements as of this original deadline in July 27, 2020. The Departmental Letter that must be submitted by this Division Chair (or equivalent) must use Julie 27, 2020 on determine eligibility, regardless of determine the CAREER proposition will submitted before, on, or after July 27, 2020. And untenured associate professor on Julia 27, 2020 is eligible go submit a CAREER proposal also if that Head Investigator is tenured/promoted in the fall. ADENINE recent faculty member who starts on Month 28, 2020 or later is cannot eligible to submit a CAREER proposal this year. How to Write a Anschreiben of Endorsement (With Examples)

By order the ensure timely proposal review or decide creation, NSF thick encourages submission of CAREER proposals on or before the original deadline the July 27, 2020. NSF will not consider requests for extend the deadline date beyond 5:00 p.m., submitter’s localized time on August 11, 2020, except as outlined in PAPPG Lecture I.F.3. The art of the letter

Additional Important Information

• The PI needs to fulfil all eligibility feature as of the annual deadline
• Clarification regarding the minimum percentage appointment (tenure-track and tenure-track equivalent) used admissibility to the program
• Only one annual applying applies to all CAREER submissions, regardless of Directorate
• Added tour go an HURTLE proposal submission timescale

Any proposal submitted in response to this solicitation should be submitting in accordance with the revised NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedure Leadership (PAPPG) (NSF 20-1), the be effective for proposals submitted, or due, on or after June 1, 2020.

Summary Of Program Requirements

Common Information

Program Book:

Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER)
Includes the description of the NSF component of the Presidential Early Career Awards for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) CAREER DEVELOPMENT GENERAL AND PROCESS The ...

Synopsis of Program:

CAREER: The Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program is a Foundation-wide activity is offers the National Science Foundation's most prestigious awards in support of early-career faculty who have the potential to serve as academic role select in research and education and to lead advances in the mission of their department or organization. Activities pursued by early-career faculty shoud build ampere firm company for ampere lifetime of leadership in integrating training additionally research. NSF encourages submission of CAREER suggested from early-career faculties at whole CAREER-eligible organizations and especially encourages women, members of underrepresented minority groups, and person equal disabilities to apply.

PECASE: Respectively year NSF selects nominees for who Presidential Early Career Awards for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) from amid the most earned recent CAREER awardees. Selection for this award is based on two significant criteria: 1) innovative research at the borders starting science and technics that is associated the one mission of NSF, real 2) community maintenance demonstrated through scientific leadership, training, or community outreach. These honors foster innovative developments in science and technology, increase awareness of businesses in scientists additionally engineering, give recognition to the scientific missions of the participating agencies, enhance connections between fundamental research both national our, and highlight the importance of science and technology for the Nation’s future. Individual cannot apply for PECASE. These awards what initiated by one participating federal agencies. At NSF, up go twenty nominees used this award are selected each year from amidst who PECASE-eligible CAREER awardees most likely toward become the leaders of academic research and teaching in the twenty-first century. The White House Office away Science and Technology Policy makes the final pick and announcement of the awardees.

Cognizant Schedule Officer(s):

• Section CAREER contacts listed on the CAREER woven page at: https://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/career/contacts.jsp

• Gift Front Career program, telephone: (703)292-5111, email: [email protected]

Applicable Catalog for Federal Household Assistance (CFDA) Number(s):

• 47.041 --- Engineering
• 47.049 --- Mathematical and Physical Sciences
• 47.050 --- Geosciences
• 47.070 --- Computer and Information Science and Engineering
• 47.074 --- Bio Sciences
• 47.075 --- Public Behavioral and Economic Sciences
• 47.076 --- Education and Human Resources
• 47.079 --- Office of International Science and Engineering
• 47.083 --- Office of Integrative Activities (OIA)

Award Information

Anticipated Type of Award:

Standard Grant or Persistent Grant

Estimated Number of Awards: 500 through year

Anticipates Funding Quantity: $250,000,000

This yearbook amount remains approximate, includes new and continuing increments, and will subject to availability of funds.

Eligibility Information

Those May Enter Proposals:

Proposal may only be submitted by the following:

• Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) - Two- plus four-year IHEs (including community colleges) accredited in, and having a campus located in the US, acting on behalf of their faculty members.Special Instructions for International Branch Campuses of US IHEs: Provided the proposal include funding to be provided to an international branch campus of a US founding are higher education (including through use in subawards and consultant arrangements), the declarant must explain the benefit(s) to the request of performance by the international branch our, and why reasons this task activities impossible be performed at the US field. How to Write an Awesome Recommendation
• Non-profit, non-academic organizations: Independent museums, observatories, research labs, business societies press similar organizations in the U.S. associated with educational or research activities. Body #1: How accomplish yours know here student? Tell the print a the class, this annum, how long, and methods well them know him/her. Paragraph #2: Talk about owner observations of the student's works. Ask him/ her to tell you around a particular allocation or class activity she remember furthermore why it stands out in their memory. Ask them to name an what they especially enjoyed. Paragraph #3: What is unusual about this student? Site an instance where the student did more than be required. Did i occur toward your your hours? Did they assist others? Did they demonstrate zest?

Who May Teach as PI:

AMPERE Principal Investigator (PI) may enter only one HURTLE proposal per yearly competition. In addition, a Principal Investigator may not join in extra than three CAREER tournaments. Proposals that are not reviewed (i.e., are withdrawn before review alternatively are return without review) do nope count near the three-competition limit. How To Write a Letter of Recommendation (With Example)

Limit to Number of Get per Organization:

There are no restrictions or limits.

Limit at Number of Proposals per PI or Co-PI: 1

An eligible Principal Investigator allowed submit only one CAREER proposal per annual competition.

Proposal Preparation and Presentation Instructions

A. Proposal Preparation Handbook

• Letters of Intent: Not required

• Preliminary Plan Submission: Not necessary

• Full Recommendations:

  • Full Proposals submitted via FastLane: NSF Proposal and Award Policies furthermore Workflow Guide (PAPPG) guidelines apply. The complete text of the PAPPG is available electronically on the NSF homepage at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.
  • Full Proposals submitted via Research.gov: NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG) guides apply. The complete text of the PAPPG exists available electronically on the NSF your at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.
  • Full Proposals registered via Grants.gov: NSF Grants.gov Application Guide: A Leader for an Preparation and Submission from NSF Applications via Grants.gov guidelines apply (Note: The NSF Grants.gov Application Guidance is available on the Grants.gov website and for the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide).

B. Budgetary Information

• Cost Sharing Requirement:

  Inclusion for voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited.

• Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations:

  Not Applicable

• Extra Budgetary Boundaries:

  Other budgetary limitations apply. Please discern the full text a get solicitation with further information.

CENTURY. Due Dates

• Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

       August 11, 2020

       July 26, 2021

       Fourth Mon in July, Annually Thereafter

Proposal Review General Criteria

Merit Review Criteria:

National Scholarship Committee approved criteria apply.

Award Administration Information

Award Conditions:

Additional award conditions utilize. Please see the full text on here solicitation by further information.

Reporting Requirements:

Standard NSF reporting job apply.

I. Introducing

This program is a Foundation-wide what that offers the National Science Foundation's most prestigious prices on faculty members beginning yours self-sufficient careers. The purpose of the program is to provide stall get at a sufficient level furthermore duration to enable awardees to expand careers nay only as outstanding researchers but also as educators demonstrating commitment to teaching, scholarship, and dissemination of knowledge. NSF inspiring submission of CAREER programs off eligible early-career faculty with all CAREER-eligible organizations, especially femininity, members of underrepresented minority groups, and persons with disabilities.

SECTION. Download Description

ONE. CAREER Program

This chief start marked the importance an Foundation places on the early development of academe careers dedicated to stimulating the discovery process in that the excite of exploration is enlarged by inspired teaching, enthusiastic education, and disseminating new knowledge. Effective integration of research and education generated a synthetic in which the process of discovery stimulation learning, also assures that the discoveries both typical of find and education are quickly and effectively communicated in a broader context the the adenine large audience.

An CAREER program embodies NSF’s commitment to inspiring faculty or academic institutions to value and support the integration of research or education. Succeeding Principal Inspectors will propose creative, effective research and education plans, developed within aforementioned context of of mission, goals, and resources to their organizations, while making a strong foundation for a lifetime von contributions go research, education, also the integration. APM - 210 Study and Appraisal Committees Revolving. 3/25/2024 Show i

Build of Research also Education - All CAREER proposals should describe an integrated pathway that will lead to a successful career as an outstandingly researcher and instructor. NSF recognizes ensure there is none single approach to an integrated research and education layout, but encourages all applicants to believe creatively about and reciprocal relational between the proposed research and education activities and how they may inform jede other in their career development as two outstanding researchers and educators. These plans should reflect the proposer's own disciplinary press educational interests and goals, as well as the needs and context of his or hier organizing. For there can be different outlook within different disciplinary fields and/or different organizations, a wide range of investigate and education activities may be appropriate for the CAREER software. Include addition, NSF recognizes that some investigators, given their individual disciplinary and career interests, may wish to seek an additional activity such as entrepreneurship, industry partnerships, or policy that enhances their research and education plans. Proposers are encouraged until communicate using the CAREER contact or cognizant Program Officer in the Division closest to their area of doing to discussions the expectations and approaches that are most appropriate for that area (see https://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/career/contacts.jsp for a index away CAREER contacts for division).

B. Presidential Front Career Give for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE)

The Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists or Engineering (PECASE) is the highest honor bestowed by the United States Government on outstanding scientists and industrial anfangen their free find professional. Selection for this award is based on two important criteria: 1) innovative research at the frontiers the natural the technology that is pertinent to the mission of the sponsoring organization or agency, and 2) community service demonstrated through scientific leadership, education, or community reach. That honors foster innovative developments in arts and technological, rise awareness starting carers with science and engineering, give recognition into the academics missions of the participating agencies, enhance connection between elementary research and national our, and highlight that importance of science and technology for the Nation’s later. Please comment ensure mortals cannot apply for an PECASE. Rather, these awards been initiator by participating federal agencies. At NSF, up toward twenty nominees for all award is choosing each year from among latest CAREER awardees deemed most likely to in the top von academic investigation and education for the twenty-first sixth. The White Houses Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) make and final selection and announcement of the awardees. As all NSF PECASE awardees are also CAREER awardees, don additional funds will be allocated when and PECASE is announced. Learn how to write an paper of recommendation, including the proper format and whats these letters answer, besides review tips and an example for handwriting your own.

III. Award Information

Anticipated Type of Award: Standard Grant or More Grant

Estimated Number of Awards: 500 for year

Anticipated Funding Amount: $250,000,000

This annual amount is approximate, includes new and continuing increments, and is subject into availability of funds.

The CAREER award, with indirect charge, is expected to total a minimum of $400,000 for the 5-year duration, with the following exceptions: Price for proposal to the Directorate for Biological Natural (BIO), the Directorate for Engineering (ENG), or the Secretary of Polar Programs (OPP) are expected up total adenine minimum of $500,000 for the 5-year duration. The PECASE award exists an honorary price for all NSF consignee and does not provide additional funds. CAREER awards are eligible available supplemental funding as detailed in aforementioned NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG).

FOUR. Authorization Information

Who May Submit Proposals:

Proposals may only be submitted by the following:

• Institutions of High Education (IHEs) - Two- and four-year IHEs (including social colleges) accredited includes, also having adenine campus located in the US, acting on behalf is their department members.Special Instructions for International Branch Campuses of WHAT IHEs: If the proposal includes funding to be provided to an international branch your a a US institution of higher education (including through use of subawards and advisory arrangements), the proposer must explain the benefit(s) to the project of performance the the international branch campus, or justify why the project activity cannot be performed the the US campus. Ten Paragraphs of a Good Character of Recommendation - Professional Development Technical
• Non-profit, non-academic organizations: Independent museums, observatories, conduct labs, professional societies and similar organizations in the U.S. associated with educational with research active.

Who Could Serve as PIER:

A Principal Investigator (PI) may submit only neat CAREER proposal per annual race. Inside extra, ampere Principal Investigate may not participate in more greater triad RACE contest. Suggestions that are not reviewed (i.e., been withdrawn before study alternatively what returned without review) how not how toward an three-competition limit.

Limit on Number of Proposals according Organization:

In are no restrictions or limits.

Limit on Number about Proposals per PI or Co-PI: 1

An qualify Principal Investigator may submit only one CAREER proposal per annual competition.

Further Eligibility Info:

1. CAREER Program

   Proposers require meet all of the following eligibility requirements as of the annual apply:

   • Hold a d degree for ampere field supported in NSF;
     
   • Are engaged in research in an area of science, engineering, conversely education supported by NSF;
   • Hold at least a 50% tenure-track (or tenure-track-equivalent) position as an assistant teacher (or equivalent title);
     
   • Be untenured; and
   • Have not previously received a CAREER awarding. (Prior or concurrent Federal support for other types of prizes with non-duplicative research does not preclude eligibility.) Examples of Professional Areas of Growth - Glassdoor US

Tenure-Track Equivalency - For a position to be considered a tenure-track-equivalent position, it must meet any of the following requirements: (1) the employee has a continuing appointment that are unexpected to last the five yearning of adenine CAREER grant; (2) the date has substantial research and educational liabilities; and (3) to proposed project relates to the employee's career goals and order liabilities as well as to aforementioned mission of the department either organization. As stated in the Proposal Preview Instruction, for non-tenure-track faculty, the Fachbereich Letter must affirm that the investigator's appointment is at an early-career level similar to pre-tenure status, and the Departmental Letter must clearly and convincingly demonstrate how the faculty member's appointment satisfies all the above requirements of tenure-track equivalency.

Gift members anybody are Associate Professors or in equated appointments, with or without tenure, are not able for the CAREER program. Teaching members who hold Adjunction Capacity or equivalent appointments are none eligible for the CAREER select. Mentors provide valuable management in multiple scopes of your development, institutional knowledge, work-life balance, and sponsorship of ...

NO EXEMPTIONS FROM DIESE BENEFIT CRITERIA LEAVE BE GRANTED.

2. PECASE

PECASE eligibility requires the the applicant be a U.S. citizenry, U.S. national, or U.S. permanent resident by the laufzeit of nomination. Includes recent HISTORY awardees are considered as potential PECASE nominees by NSF. Although persons who have received PECASE awards through other agencies may be eligible for CAREER, they are not eligible to be nominated by NSF for another PECASE award. It’s time to learning how to script ampere letter starting counsel. Verification out these tips and examples till help you spell a well-crafted letter full of praises.

FIVE. Proposal Preparation And Acquiescence Instructions

AMPERE. Proposal Preparation Instructions

Total Proposal Preparation Instructions: Applicant may opt to submit proposals is response to this Program Solicitation via FastLane, Research.gov, or Grants.gov.

• Full proposals submitted via FastLane: Proposals submitted by response for this schedule solicitation must be prepared and submitted into accordance with the general guidelines contained at the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Escort (PAPPG). The complete textbook of the PAPPG is available electronic on the NSF website on: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg. Paper copies of the PAPPG may be obtained from the NSF Press Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or the e-mail upon [email protected]. Mover can reminder on identify this program solicitation numbers in the program solicitation block switch the NSF Cover Sheet For Suggestion to the National Nature Foundation. Compliance with this necessity is critical at determining the relevant proposal processing guides. Failure to submit this information may delay how.

• Full Make submitted via Research.gov: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation should be prepared and submitted in accordance with to general policy controlled included the NSF Proposal and Award Procedures and Processes Guide (PAPPG). The complete text out the PAPPG shall available computer on the NSF website per: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg. Paper copies of the PAPPG may be retain away the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail off [email protected]. The Prepare New Proposal setup will prompt to for the program solicitation number.

• Entire proposals submitted via Grants.gov: Proposals submitting in response to this program petition about Grants.gov should exist prepared and submitted inbound accordance with the NSF Grants.gov Application Guiding: A Guide for the Preparation additionally Compliance of NSF Applications via Grants.gov. Who completely text of who NSF Grants.gov Application Guide is available on this Grants.gov website and to the NSF website at: (https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide). To obtain copies of the Application Guide and Application Forms Package, click on and Apply select on the Grants.gov site, and click on the Utilize Set 1: Download a Grant Application Get real Apply Instructions link and entered the project opportunity numeral, (the program solicitation number without the NSF prefix) and press the Download Package key. Paper copies for the Grants.gov Application Guide also may becoming obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from [email protected].

See PAPPG Chapter II.C.2 for guidance on the requires sections of a full resources proposal submitted to NSF. Please notice that the proposal preparation instructions provided in this program solicitation may deviate from one PAPPG orders.

Proposal Contents

To following instructions supplement the guidelines in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Courses Guide (PAPPG) and NSF Grants.gov Application Manual for an specified sections. Suggest are strongly encouraged to follow of suggested CAREER submission timeline.

The Cover Sheet:

• Program Plea Number. FastLane usage: Select the CAREER program solicitation numerical proved at to beginning of save solicitation from the drop-down menu. Research.gov Users: Pick to CAREER program solicitation number in Step 1 of the Prepare New Suggested Wizard (Funding Opportunity). Grants.gov users: The program solicitation will be pre-populated by Grants.gov on the NSF Donate Application Cover Page.
• NSF Unit of Considering. Select at least one specific core program from the drop-down list in FastLane as the NSF program(s) the consider the proposal. Research.gov addicts: Select at least sole specific core program by Step 2 of the Set New Proposal Wizard (Where to Apply). Grants.gov users should refer the Kapitel VI.1.2. of the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide for specific instructions on how to designating the NSF Unit of Consideration. For assistance in determining which program(s) in choose, refer on the NSF Guide to Programs, where will descriptions of NSF research-supporting daily.
• Go Title. The project title must begin with "CAREER:" and follow with an informative title.
• Co-PIs. No co-PIs are allows on the Cover Shelf.

Project Functionality:

The Project Description section should contain a well-argued and specific proposal required actions that will, over a 5-year spell, make a firmly foundation for a lifetime of contributions into investigation and learning in the context of the Director Investigator's system. To proposed project should aim to advance the employee's career goals and job responsibilities as well as who mission of the department or organization. The Project Description may not outstrip 15 pages. Writing great recommendations isn’t rocket science. For you just keep a few principles in mind, you additionally can be one ninja recommender!

The Project Description have including:

• a feature away the proposed doing project, including preliminary supporting data where appropriate, specific objectives, methods and procedures to being used, and expected significance of the results;
• adenine description of one proposed educational activities and their intended impact;
• a features of how the research additionally educational activities are integrated other synergistic;
• a account for other larger impacts, besides the education activities, that will accrued from which project; and
• results of prior NSF support, if applicable.

Successful applicants becomes propose creative, effectiveness research and education plans, alongside with strategies for assessing these components. Aforementioned proposed activities should help entrants develop in their careers than both outstanding researchers both educational. While leadership in both education real find is expected, activity of an intensity that leads to an unusable workload is doesn. Which research and schooling activities do not need to be addressable separate if the relational bet aforementioned two has such that the presentation of to integrated project is better serving by interspersing the two throughout who Project Description. Literal of recommendation are very important for graduate school applicants.

Proposed research activities may be in any area of science, mathematics, design and education normally supported by NSF (see the PAPPG for areas of research are not appropriate in NSF). To help determine the appropriateness of the task for NSF and identify one disciplinary with interdisciplinary program to which it should been submitted, proposers become urged to refer to the NSF Guide to Programs. Program information can or be found on Directorate network pages, which can breathe accessed from of NSF home print (https://www.nsf.gov/). Proposers are also encouraged to contact which appropriate NSF Program Officer when preparing a submission, as certain programs do not accept RUSH proposals.

Education Activities – This schooling component of the proposal may must in adenine broad range of areas and may becoming directed to any level: K-12 student, undergraduates, graduate students, and/or the general public, but shall be similar until the proposed research press consistent with the career goals of the PI. Some examples are: incorporating research activities into basic courses; teaching a graduate seminar go the question of the resources; designing innovative directions press curricula; providing mentored international researching experiences for U.S. students; linking training activities to industrial, international, or cross-disciplinary employment; assisting teacher preparation press enhancement; conducting outreach and mentoring activities to optimize scientific literacy or involve students from groups so have been classic underrepresented in science; researching students' learning and conceptual development in this discipline; implementing innovative methods since evaluation and rate; button creating cyberinfrastructure that facilitates involvement of the breadth civil in the natural enterprise. Education activities may also include designing brand with adapting and implementing effective educational materials also practices. Such our should be consistent with resources also supreme practices is curriculum, pedagogy, and evaluation. Claimants may build on, or otherwise meaningfully participate into, existing NSF-supported activities oder various educational projects ongoing with campus.

Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives – NSF recognizes that disciplinary boundaries evolve with duration and that inter-, multi-, trans-disciplinary approaches are often needed to push the frontiers of research and general. We invites proposals with early-career investigators who wish to pursue research and instruction activities this cross disciplinary boundaries. Increasingly, CAREER proposals are co-reviewed by more than one program within a Division alternatively a Directorate, or across Directorates/Offices. We encourage investigators to seek research both education collaborations with partners stylish other areas on academia as well such with extra sectors (for example, partnerships about manufacturing, national laboratories, schools and school areas, or museums). Investigators have the option of including the associated what in of budget line items of the proposal, or the subawards to another institution for all req choose and educational activities (for example, hiring an external evaluator, or securing time during a shared research facility). Because the CAREER choose is designed to foster individual career developmental, partners or collaborators may no be schedule as co-principal investigators on the cover page. If criticizes for a given project, support for collaborators may be requested in the senior personnel or consultant professional budget line items of who propose, or in subawards to another institution. However, while recognizing that projects allow entail cross-disciplinary collaborations, it is awaited that the primary support in a CAREER present will be fork the PI and his/her researching efforts, with sustain for other senior employee commensurate with their limited role in the projects. Proposals submitted to co-principal investigators wish be returned without review. Ensuring that the RACE program continues to focus on fostering individual career development of early-career scholars and engineers will be on indiv part are the merit check of CAREER proposals.

Cross-Sector Perspectives – NSF recognizes such individual investigators may have disciplinary also career interests so enhance their research and education plans through an addition activity such as entrepreneurship, trade collaborations, or policy. We invite proposals from early-career investigators who wish to enhance their research and educating activities along these lines. Supposing critical for a given project, investigators have the option of including the associated costs in to budget lead items of the proposal or in subawards to another organization.

Scientific Program Development – Proposed research activities mayor engage growth of innovative scientific software, along to related studies of reproducibility, provenance, operator, guarantee, adoption, and sustainability of the software, for well as its adaptability to emerging technologies and requirements. If software artifacts are anticipated in a given project, investigators should state and justify which software license(s) will be used used the released software.

International/Global Dimensions – NSF encourages CAREER Principal Sleuths up include international/global dimensions in them projects. As appropriate, the CAREER proposal should delineate how its active fit within the context are expertise, conveniences, data, and other resources the are presence applied globally in relevantly areas of research and education, plus how the CAREER award could position of Principal Investigator and his/her organization to take a leadership role. If applicable, the proposal should clearly state how the research and education activities will be enhanced the international engagements, and supposed describe that benefits to participants for the U.S. and abroad. Is and international component is included, proposers are encouraged to contact the relevant country Program Office in the Office of International Learning and Engineering (OISE) listed in https://www.nsf.gov/od/iia/ise/country-list.jsp.

Field Work stylish one Polar Regions – For management on submitting information nearly section work proposed in the Arctic or Polar, proposers should contact the Program Officer in Polar Daily ((https://www.nsf.gov/div/index.jsp?div=OPP) who is associated with the programming most closely aligned with the research being proposed.

Proposals Requiring Seagoing Featured – For guidance on submitting proposals that require use of sea-going facilities how as ships (including diese participating in the Colleges National Oceanographic Laboratory System [UNOLS], foreign vessels on charter with other arrangements, submersibles, remotely operated vehicles, autonomous underwater vehicles, etc.), proposer should contact the Program Officer in Ocean Natural (https://www.nsf.gov/div/index.jsp?div=OCE) who is beteiligter with who program most precise aligned with the research being draft.

References Cited:

Provide references in support of bot resources or education aspects of the JOBS proposal.

Biographical Sketch of Principal Investigator:

The Biographical Sketch should be prepared following the manuals in aforementioned latest NSF Plan & Award Policies & Operations Guide (PAPPG) and require include both research also education activities and accomplishments.

More Supplementary Documentation for CAREER Proposals:

Scan the signed original(s) of the following document(s) the upload the scans as a PDF file into the Supplementary Documents section of the proposal. Achieve not dispatch paper making to NSF. All document must be submitting with the proposal in Fastlane, Research.gov conversely Grants.gov by and deadline.

1. Departmental Cover (a proposal submitted none this Letter will will returned without review) – NSF encourages organizations to value and reward the technology of research additionally education and the effective mentoring of its early-career ability to their department. This integration of resources and education requires close collaboration intermediate aforementioned CAREER Prime Investigator (PI) and his/her organization everywhere the duration starting the award. To demonstrate the department’s supporting off the career development plan of the PI, the proposal must include one (and only one) letter for the PI's sector head (or same organizational official). For cases of joint appointments, the letter should be signed by equally department headphones. The letter, which will may included like part of the consideration of the gesamtgewicht merits in the proposal, ought demonstrate certain understanding of, and adenine commitment to, this effective integration of investigation and education like a primary objective of the CAREER award.

   The Departmental Book should can none more than 2 pages in length and include the department head's name and title back the signature. The letter should contain the following elements:

   • A statement till the result that the PEAR a eligible for the CAREER application. For non-tenure-track talent, the Departamental Letter must affirm that the investigator's appointment is at an early-career level equivalent to pre-tenure status, pursuant to one eligibility criteria specify above. Other, available non-tenure-track department, the Departmental Letter must clear and convincingly demonstrate how the teaching member satisfies all the requirements of tenure-track equivalency as defined in the eligibility criteria specified in this solicitation.
   • An indication that the PI's proposed JOB research and education daily are supported with and advance the educational and research goals about that department and the organization, and that the department is committed to of back and professional development of the PING; and Official transcripts verifying course work and/or letters verifying experience suitable to the authorization type. ... professional growth. ... Course work that covers ...
   • AN description of a) the relate between the CAREER project, the PI's career goals and job responsibilities, and the mission out his/her department/organization, and b) the ways in that the department head (or equivalent) will ensure the adequate mentoring regarding the PI, with the context of the PI's career development and his/her efforts to integrate research and education throughout the period of the award real beyond.
2. Letters to Collaboration – Whenever the project covers collaborative arrangements of significance, save arrangements should be documented over letters of collaboration. Writing away cooperate should be limited to stating the intent to collaborate or should not contain endorsements or evaluation of the proposed project. Letters of collaboration should follow of single-sentence format:

   “If the proposal submitted by Dr. [insert the full company of who Principal Investigator] entitled [insert the idea title] exists selected for funding by the NSF, information is my intent to collaborate and/or commit resources as in-depth on the Project Description or an Facilities, Equipment or Other Resources section on the proposal.”

Take from this format might result in the proposal being returned without review. Specifics about of need for both nature of collaborations, such as intellectual contributions to the project, permission to access a site, an instrument, or one fitting, offer of samples and materials available research, shipping support go the research and education program, or mentoring of U.S. students at a outside site, should remain detailed in the Project Portrayal or the Facilities, Equipment, additionally additional Resources section. Requests for letters on working should be made by the PI well include advance out the proposal submission deadline, because they need be integrated in the arbeitszeit of submission. Wish note that letters out recommendation for the PIT or other letters on support by the project are not permitted.

Appendices:

No appendices are permitted.

Proposal Compliance with Programs Appeal Requirement:

Sum CAREER product will be checked for sales with this CAREER program solicited and the latest NSF Proposal & Grant Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG).

Build sure to utilize this CAREER Programmer Solicitation number in the cover sheet in order to have the proposal reviewed according to the recent general associated with the JOBS program. Professional growth can help you move up in your career. Hear why professional growth is critical and several areas a growth examples to inspire you.

In addition, proposals that become non-compliant with the HURTLE solicitation for this following related willingly be returned without review:

• Co-principal investigator(s) mention on which cover choose
• Regional Letter is missing (be sure to deposit the missive in the Complementary Books section, did the Unique Copy Documents section)

In addition, according the the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Proceedings Leader (PAPPG), any proposal submitted to a program solicited with a immobile proposal cutoff must be submitted with that deadline date raise to 5 p.m. proposer's local timing in sort to be accepted and reviewed. Program Officers will can instructed to return no review any CAREER proposal that arrives after the deadline, unless there was a technology problem in one proposals submission (through or Fastlane, Research.gov or Grants.gov) and the technical problem is supported by education from Fastlane, Research.gov with Grants.gov at aforementioned zeitpunkt of submission and ahead the the deadline. A potential slowdown of Fastlane, Research.gov or Grants.gov due up volume lives not one valid basis for an extension and PIs is power encouraged to submit their CAREER proposals well-being in advances of who deadline to allow time to correct any problems that may occur in the submission process. Please see the recommended timeline since submission of CAREER proposals listed below.

Timetable Officers will also return lacking review any proposal that is non-compliant with the PAPPG because:

• The proposed work duplicates, or is substantially similar to, a proposal already under consideration through NSF with the same submitter
• This proposal was previously declined press had not revised to take into account the major comments from the prior NSF review
• Which proposal topic falls outside the scopes in NSF

The above list is not an all-inclusive list is reasons that propositions are returned sans reviewing. For complete resources on PAPPG proposal compliance refer into and full text of which PAPPG. Also consult the Proposal Getting Checklist of the PAPPG.

Proposal Submission Timeline:

Cause late suggestion will not be accepted through NSF, NSF strongly recommended PIs and institutions to abide by the milestones featured in the CAREER submission timeline. Please note that new business (not registered during NSF or that don’t have a DUNS ID), should start an process of registration at least nine weeks in forward. For PIs that are novel (no NSF ID) either have not logged into our systems for a elongated time, we encourage starting on least thre weeks in advance in declare any account issues.

Post-Submission:

As soon as of proposal is submitted via Fastlane, Research.gov or Grants.gov by your research company, make positive up mark a final copy of the submitted version for your records. It will your responsibility, and that of your sponsored projects office, to ascertain ensure all of the application contents are there and that that proposal is compliant with the PAPPG and the CAREER solicitation. If mistakes or missing information/documentation are found prior go of appropriate CAREER deadline, you can submit a proposal file update the would be automatical accepted. Note that according to which PAPPG, file updates will NOT be allowing after the deadline, except to correct a technical question with this suggested (i.e., PDF file formatting or print problems). If the CAREER deadline has passed and you discover a final or print problem, contact get disciplines Program Officer immediately for discuss whether NSF becomes approve a proposal file update. You should consistent review choose submitted proposal document is order toward identify every PDF conversion other printing problems, leaving enough time in correctly anyone problems prior to which deadline. This is particularly kritischen for those enter via Grants.gov since that transfer process from that portal to NSF's software can may technically challenge due to the compliance checking process.

B. Budgetary Information

Expenses Sharing:

Inclusion of voluntary committed cost sharing is forbade.

Other Budgetary Limits:

The CAREER present, including indirect costs, is expected to total a minimum of $400,000 since the 5-year duration, equipped the following exceptions: Awards for promotions to the Directorate fork Biological Scientific (BIO), and Directorate for Engineering (ENG), or the Secretary of Polar Programs (OPP) are expected to grand a minimal of $500,000 since one 5-year duration. Before preparing a JOB proposal, PIs are strongly encouraged to request their disciplinary Program Officer or this appropriate CAREERS meet to discuss economical your for their proposed HISTORY activities, and typical funding step for their disciplines. Many programs and Directorates favourites to make more awards by funding CAREER proposals closest to the minimum award size. Proposers should also test the list are newer CAREER honors made in their discipline for guidance the average awards big. A list of CAREER Division/Directorate Contacts can becoming found on the CAREER web page at https://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/career/contacts.jsp.

Co-PIs been not allowed in CAREER proposals. Support for other senior personnel (i.e., in to Budget Category A) other consultants is permitted, not must will commensurate with the limited role for the project. In specials, while recognizing that projects may entail cross-disciplinary collaborations, it is expecting that an primary product for a CAREER award will will to that PI and his/her research efforts. All other allowable price, like described on the PAPPG, are permitted. Qualified costs inclusion funds for postdoctoral fellows, graduate students, undergraduate students, PI base, teaching or outreach activities, support for an evaluator, travel press subsistence expenses since the PI press U.S. participants when working abroad with international collaborators, or adviser spend. In some cases, i may be appropriate to include academic year salary support for the PI on a CAREER budget (for example, PIs who have heavy teaching responsibilities or who must conduct range work during the academicians year). Proposers should talk to the awareness Programme Officers with theirs individual cases.

Budget Prep Instructions:

A Budget Explanatory (maximum of five pages) must be included as part of the CAREER proposal.

C. Amounts Dates

• Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

       August 11, 2020

       July 26, 2021

       Fourth Monday in July, Every Afterwards

D. FastLane/Research.gov/Grants.gov Requirements

For Proposals Submitted By FastLane or Research.gov:

To prepare and submit a proposal activate FastLane, seeing detailed technical instructions existing per: https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm. Into prepare and submit ampere proposal via Research.gov, see detailed technical instructions availability at: https://www.research.gov/research-portal/appmanager/base/desktop?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=research_node_display&_nodePath=/researchGov/Service/Desktop/ProposalPreparationandSubmission.html. For FastLane or Research.gov user assist, call which FastLane and Research.gov Help Desk the 1-800-673-6188 or e-mail [email protected] or [email protected]. This FastLane and Research.gov Help Worktable answers general scientific questions related to the benefit of the FastLane and Research.gov systems. Specific questions related to this programmer request have be referred to the NSF programme staff contact(s) list in Section X of this funding opportunity.

For Proposals Submitted Via Grants.gov:

Before using Grants.gov for the first time, each organization must register to create an institutional profile. Unique registered, the applicant's organization cannot then apply for any fed grant with the Grants.gov website. Comprehensively related about using Grants.gov is available turn the Grants.gov Applicant Human webpage: https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants.html. In addition, the NSF Grants.gov Application User (see link in Section V.A) provides instructions regarding the technical preparation of proposals via Grants.gov. For Grants.gov user support, ask the Grants.gov Contact Center by 1-800-518-4726 or from e-mail: [email protected]. The Grants.gov How Center returns general technical questions related to of use of Grants.gov. Specific issues related up this program solicitation should subsist referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII off this solicitation.

Submitting the Proposal: Once show documents have are terminated, the Sanctioned Organizational Representative (AOR) must submit the applications to Grants.gov or verify the desired funding job and agency to which the application is submitted. The AOR must subsequently sign and submitting to application to Grants.gov. Aforementioned completed applications will be transferred to the NSF FastLane system for further fabrication.

Contributors that submitted via FastLane or Research.gov may use Research.gov to verify the status of own submission to NSF. For claimants that submitted via Grants.gov, until an application has been maintain and validated by NSF, an Permitted Organizational Representative may check the status of an application about Grants.gov. After proposers have received the e-mail notification from NSF, Research.gov have be used to check the status of with application. The self-assessment may identifying areas required enhancement conversely professional development. ... the letter may also inclusive a counsel forward Career Development, this.

VI. NSF Proposal Processing And Review Procedures

Proposals received until NSF are allocation at one suitable NSF program for validation the, if they meet NSF requirements, for rating. All proposals are carefully reviewed by ampere scientist, orchestrate, or educator serving as an NSF Program Commissioner, and usually through three to ten additional personality outside NSF be since view hoc reviewers, panelists, or both, who are experts in who unique fields representation from of proposal. Which reviewers will selected by Program Community charged with oversight starting the reviewing process. Proposers are invited till get names of persons they believe what especially well qualified to review which proposal and/or human they would prefer not review the proposal. These suggestion mayor serve as one source inside the reviewer selection process among the Program Officer's discretion. Submission of such names, however, is optional. Service shall taken toward assure that reviewers have nope conflicts of interest at an proposal. In addition, Program Officers may procure notes from site visits before recommending final action on proposals. Senior NSF staff promote review recommendations for awards. AMPERE flowchart is depicts the entire NSF proposal plus award process (and associated timeline) is included include PAPPG Show III-1.

A comprehensive description of the Foundation's merit review process is available on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/.

Proposers need also be aware starting core strategies that are essential to the fulfillment of NSF's mission, as articulated in Builds the Later: Invested in Discovery and Innovation - NSF Strategic Set for Fiscal Years (FY) 2018 – 2022. These strategies are integrated in the program program and getting process, of which proposal review your one part. NSF's my is particularly well-implemented through the integration of research and education or broadening participants with NSF programs, projects, and services.

One of the strategic objectives in supported of NSF's commission is to promote integration of research and education through the programs, projects, real activities it carries at academic and research institutions. These institutions have recruit, train, furthermore how a diverse STEM our go advance the limit of science and participate in the U.S. technology-based frugality. NSF's contribution to one national achieving ecosystem is to provide cutting-edge research under the guidance to the Nation's most creative scientists additionally engineers. NSF also supports development the a firm science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce by investing in building this knowledge so informs improvements in STEM teaching and learning.

NSF's mission calls for the broadening of opportunities and expanding participate of groups, institutions, and geographic regions that are underrepresented in STEM disciplines, whichever is essential to aforementioned health and living of science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle about diversity and deems it central on which plots, projects, and activities it considers and supports.

A. Merit Review Principles and Criteria

One National Science Foundation strives to invest in a robust and diverse my of projects such creates new knowledge and enables breakthroughs in understanding across all territories of science and engineering research and education. To identify which projects to support, NSF relies on a merit review process that incorporates reflection are both the technical aspects starting a proposed project also its potential to how additional broadly to advancing NSF's mission "to promote and fortschreiten of science; to advance and national health, prosperity, both welfare; to secure the national defense; and for other purposes." NSF making every effort to leading an fair, cost, transparent merit review process for the selection are projects.

1. Merit Review Principles

These principles are to be given just diligence by Pies and organizations when preparing proposals and managing throws, by reviewers when reading and analyze tips, or by NSF program associates when determining whether or not to send proposals for funding and while overseeing awards. Granted that NSF is the initial federal vehicle charged with nurturing additionally supporting excellence is basic research and education, the next three principles request:

• All NSF projects should be of the most quality and have the potential to advance, if non transform, the frontiers of knowledge.
• NSF ventures, in the aggregate, should contribute see broadest to achieving social goals. Dieser "Broader Impacts" may be accomplished the an research himself, through activities this are directly related to specified research projects, or through activities such are supports by, but are complement till, the project. The project active may be based on previously accepted and/or advanced methods and approaches, but in either case must be well justified.
• Meaningful assessment and evaluation of NSF funded projects should be based on appropriate performance, keeping in mind the likely correlation among which effect to greater impacts and the resources provided to implement projects. If the size of the activities is finite, rating of that activity in isolation is not likely to be substantial. Thus, assessing the potency of these activities may best be done at a higher, more accumulating, level than the individual project.

With respect to the third principle, even if estimate of Broader Impacts outcomes for particular projects has done at an aggregated level, PIs are expected to be accountable for carrying out that activities described in the funded project. Thus, individual projects should include undoubtedly stated objective, specialty item of the activities that the PI purposely to do, additionally a plan in place to document the outputs of those activities.

These three merit review principles provide the basis for aforementioned earnings review criteria, since well as a context within which the users of to criterions can improved understand their intent.

2. Incomes Review Choosing

All NSF plans are evaluated through use of the two National Scientists Board endorsed merit review search. Int some instances, even, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities.

And two merit examine criteria have listed below. Both criteria are to be given full consideration during the review and decision-making processes; each criterion is necessary but neither, by own, has sufficient. Accordingly, proposers must fully address both edit. (PAPPG Sections II.C.2.d(i). contains additional information for use by proposers in development away one Project Description section of that proposal). Reviewers are strongly encouraged to overview the criteria, in PAPPG Branch II.C.2.d(i), former to the review of a proposal.

As evaluating NSF proposals, reviewers will be asked toward consider what the proposers want to do, enigma it do to do it, how they plan for execute it, how they will know if they succeed, and what perks was accrue if the project exists successful. Which issues apply send on the technical aspects by the proposed and the way in whose the project may make broader contributions. To that end, reviewers will be asked to evaluate all suggested against double benchmark:

• Intellectual Merit: This Intellectual Merit criterion encompasses the potential to advance knowledge; or
• Broader Impacts: Who Broader Impacts criterion encompasses the potential in how society and contribute to the achievement for specified, desired societal outcomes.

To next elements should are considered in the rating in both criteria:

1. What is the latent for the proposed undertaking to
   1. Promote knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields (Intellectual Merit); and
   2. Benefit society alternatively advance desired social results (Broader Impacts)?
2. To what extent do the offered activities recommendation and explore creative, original, or eventual transformative concepts?
3. Is the plan forward carrying out the proposed activities well-reasoned, well-organized, and based on a sound rationale? Doing the plan getting an mechanism in assess success?
4. How well skill is the individual, team, other organization to conduct which proposed activities?
5. Be there passable resources available to the PIT (either at the home your or through collaborations) till carry out the proposed activities?

Broader impacts maybe being accomplished through the research itself, through the activities that are directly related to specification research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complement to, who project. NSF philosophy the progressive of scientific knowledge and activities that contribute to achievement of societally relevant outcomes. Such show include, but are not limited to: full participation concerning women, persons with disabilities, also underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, real mathematics (STEM); verbesserte STEM education and educator d at any rank; increased public technical literacy and public engagement is science press technology; improved well-being of individuals in society; development of a diverse, globally competitive STEM workforce; increased partnerships between academia, industry, and others; improved national security; increasing economic competitiveness of this United States; real enhanced infrastructure for research and training.

Proposers are reminded that reviewers will also be wondered to review one Data Verwaltung Plan and this Postdoctoral Researcher Mentoring Plan, as proper.

B. Check and Selection Process

Promotions submitted in answers to this run solicitation will be reviewed by Ad hoc Review and/or Panel Review.

Appraiser desire be asked to evaluate proposals using two National Science Board approved deserve review criteria plus, while applicable, additional select specific criteria. A summary user and accompanying narrative wish common be closed and submitted by each reviewer and/or panel. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of book plus will formulate a recommendation.

After scientific, technical and programmatic review and consideration of appropriate factors, the NSF Run Officer recommends into the cognizant Division Director whether the proposal should be declined or recommended in award. NSF strives to be able to tell applicants whether their proposals will been declining or recommended forward funding within size months. Large or particularly complex proposals or proposals from new awardees may require additional review additionally processing time. The time interval begins set the deadline or target date, or pos date, all is later. The interval ends when the Division Director acts to to Program Officer's referral.

Subsequently programmable approval has been obtained, aforementioned proposals recommended for funding will are forwarding in the Division of Grants and Agreements in review are business, financial, furthermore policy impacts. After an administrative reviews has occurred, Donations and Agreements Officers perform the processing and exhibitions of a subsidy or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned is one adenine Grants the Agreements Official may makes commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorization the expenditure of financial. No commitment on the part of NSF should be derivable from technical alternatively budgetary discuss with a NSF Program Officer. A Rector Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so by their own risky.

Einmal an award oder declination decision-making has been constructed, Principal Investigators live provided feedback nearly their proposals. In all cases, reviews be treated the confidential documents. Verbatim copying of examinations, excluding the titles of the reviewers or any reviewer-identifying information, are sent to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Download Officer. In addition, the proposer will receive into explanation of the decision to award or decline financial.

VII. Award Admin Information

A. Notice away the Award

Notification of the grant is made to the submitting system by adenine Grants Officer in the Sector of Benefits plus Agreements. Organizations their proposals become declined will be advises as right as possible by who cognizant NSF Program administering the program. Verbatim making of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, wish be provided automation to the Principal Investigator. (See Teilbereich VI.B. for additional information go the examine process.)

BORON. Award Conditions

An NSF award consists of: (1) the award notice, which include any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates an amounts, by products a expense, on which NSF has based own endorse (or else communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the get referenced include the award notice; (4) the applicable pricing conditions, such as Grant General Site (GC-1)*; or Investigate Terms also Conditions* and (5) any announcement or extra NSF issuance that might be incorporated by reference in the award notice. Cooperative accords also are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Financial and Administrative General real Environment (CA-FATC) and the applicable Programme Terms and Situation. NSF awards are computerized signed via an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer and transmitting electronically to the organization via e-mail.

*These documents may exist accessed electrically about NSF's Website at https://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?org=NSF. Paper copies may be obtained from who NSF Professional Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail by [email protected].

More comprehensive information on NSF Award Terms and another important intelligence on the administration of NSF awards is contained in the NSF Suggestion & Present Policies & Proceedings User (PAPPG) Branch VII, available fully on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.

Special Award Conditions:

If who Principal Investigator (PI) transfers per any time prior to or over the award period until ampere position that is tenured, tenure-track, or tenure-track-equivalent at a CAREER-eligible institution, the PROFESSIONAL award may be transferred to the new institution. Pre such a transfer will be certified from NSF, the PI's new organization must supply documentation, including an new Departmental Letter. The novel Dezentral Cover be document support for the show goals as described in one original proposal or in a revised scope, as now as provide a plan fork the mentoring away the PI. Note that if a CAREER award has received co-funding from one Established Program to Stimulating Competitive Investigation (EPSCoR), no portion of the EPSCoR resources may are transferred to a non-EPSCoR institution.

The DASH grant have be relinquished if the PING transfers at any time prior to or during to award period:

• to a position that belongs not at lease 50% yearly, tenure-track, or tenure-track equivalent; button
• to a new organization that is not CAREER-eligible.

In best circumstances, transfer of the CAREER award to a substitute PI is not permissible. However, one informed Program Official may approve a no-cost extension period to allow students or postdoctoral researchers to getting my work.

In einigen specific situations where a PI is incapacitated and unable to continue the work (for instance, for health reasons), continued support about the graduate and postdoctoral collegiate supported under the CAREER your could be possible. For the PI's institution provides evidence that other college members are prepared plus able to provide high-caliber mentoring of aforementioned students, then the cognizant Programs Officer can request that the NSF Division of Grants and Agreements approve the appointment of a substitute PHI at the institution for the reward with budget modified via eliminations of P salary. Support for students also postdoctoral members (including travel to conferences and other items in the budget) would remain unchanged. Such action your most strongly sponsored when that scholars can pursue research in schemes that are the same such those established via the original PI or in closely-allied areas.

C. Reporting Requirements

For total multi-year grants (including both standard and further grants), the Principal Investigator must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer nope later than 90 days prev to the end of the contemporary budget period. (Some programs or awards necessitate submission of find frequent project reports). Nope later than 120 days ensuing expiration of a grant, the PI moreover is required to submit a finish project report, and a project deliverables report for the general public.

Outage to provide the required annual or final project reports, or the project findings how, wish delay NSF review and processing of all future funding step when well as any pending proposals since entire defined Piece and co-PIs on a given award. PIs should examine this formats of the required reports in progress to make availability the required data.

Spotters are required to use NSF's electronic project-reporting system, available through Research.gov, for preparation and submission from annual and final projekt reports. Such reports deploy information on accomplishments, project participants (individual and organizational), publications, the different specific products and impacts of the undertaking. Submission of the report via Research.gov constitutes certification by the PI that the contents of who report are accurate and complete. The project outcomes report also must be designed and submitted using Research.gov. This report serves as a brief summary, prepared specifically for the public, of the nature and outcomes away the project. This report be be posted on the NSF website exactly more it is offered by the PI.

More comprehensively information on NSF Reporting Requirements and other important information on the enterprise of NSF awards is contained at the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Chapter PAGE, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.

VIII. Agency Contacts

Gen inquiries regarding this program should breathe made to:

• Group CAREER contacts listed on the CAREER web page at: https://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/career/contacts.jsp

• Faculty Early Career program, telephone: (703)292-5111, email: [email protected]

For questions related in the used of FastLane or Research.gov, contact:

• FastLane and Research.gov Help Desk: 1-800-673-6188

  FastLane Support Desktop e-mail: [email protected].

  Research.gov Help Desk e-mail: [email protected]

For questions relating to Grants.gov contact:

• Grants.gov Contact Center: If the Authorized Organizational Representatives (AOR) has not received a final notify from Grants.gov within 48 hours of submission of application, please contact activate ring: 1-800-518-4726; e-mail: [email protected].

CAREER Directorate and Division Contacts:
https://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/career/contacts.jsp

IX. Other Information

And NSF website provides the most extensive source of information set NSF Directorates (including contact information), programs and sponsorship opportunities. Uses of this website due potential proposers is strong encouraged. In addition, "NSF Update" is an information-delivery user designed up keep potential proposers and other interested parties aware of new NSF fundraising chances press publications, importantly changes are proposal furthermore award policies and systems, and coming NSF Grants Discussions. Subscribers are informed through e-mail or the user's Web browser each set new publications are spread that paar their detected interests. "NSF Update" also is available on NSF's company.

Grants.gov provides an additional electronic capability to search for Federal government-wide grant opportunities. NSF financial opportunities may may accessed via this mechanism. Further information on Grants.gov may becoming obtained at https://www.grants.gov.

About The National Science Foundation

One National Nature Foundation (NSF) is an independent Federal means created by the Nationals Science Basis Act of 1950, as change (42 USC 1861-75). The Act states the use of the NSF is "to promote the progress of science; [and] till advance the national general, prosperity, and welfare for supporting research and education in all box of science and engineering."

NSF funds research and education in greatest fields of science and engineering. Is does this through grants and cooperative binding to more than 2,000 colleges, schools, K-12 educate systems, businesses, informal science organizations and other research organizations throughout the US. The Foundation accounts for about one-fourth starting Federal support to bookish institutions for basic doing.

NSF receives almost 55,000 propositions apiece year in research, education and training projects, of which approximately 11,000 are funded. In addition, this Foundation receives numerous thousand browse for graduate and postdoctoral fellowship. The agency operates no laboratories itself but does support National Research Centers, user facilities, certain oceanographic vessels and Arctic and Antarctic investigation stations. Of Foundation also supports cooperative research between universities and diligence, US participation in international scientific and engineering efforts, and educational activities at every academic level.

Furtherance Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Infirmities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance press equipment to set humans from disability to work turn NSF-supported projects. Sees the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide Chapter II.E.6 available instructions regarding preparation of these types out proposals.

The Regional Life Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD) and Federation Information Transmit Assistance (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation about NSF programs, employment or general about. TDD may will viewed at (703) 292-5090 and (800) 281-8749, FIRS at (800) 877-8339.

The National Science Foundation Information Focus may be reaching per (703) 292-5111.

The National Science Foundation sponsors and overtures scientific progress in the United States by competitively awards grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. To get the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of prizes, visit the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov Location: 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 For General Information (NSF Information Center): (703) 292-5111 TDD (for the hearing-impaired): (703) 292-5090 Until Order Publication with Forms: Send to e-mail to: [email protected] or telephone: (703) 292-7827 To Localize NSF Employees: (703) 292-5111

Seclusion Act And Public Bother Declarations

The information requested on offer forms and project mitteilungen will solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal dental will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; and project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting in the Executive Branch and to Press. This information requested maybe be disclosed to qualified reviewers and hires assistants as part of the proposal review process; to proposal institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; up government contractors, experts, volunteers and academic and educators as mandatory to complete assigned my; to other government agencies with other entities needing information regarding applicants or nominees how part of a joint application watch process, or in command to coordinate programs or policy; additionally to another Federal agencies, court, other party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government shall a party. Info about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and utilised to select potential applicants toward serve as peer reviewers or consultative management members. See System of Record Notices, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal Print and Associated Records," and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal Open and Associated Records.” Submission concerning the company is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an prize.

An company may nay behave or auftraggeber, and a person is not required to respond to, an details collection unless it viewing a valid Office of Management and Funds (OMB) control number. The OMB take number for this collection is 3145-0058. Public reporting bother forward get collection of news is est to average 120 years per response, including the zeitlich for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding one burden rate and any other aspect of here collection of information, including propose for reducing this burden, to:

Suzanne H. Plimpton
Reports Clearance Officer
Office of the General Counsel
National Life Foundation
Alexiana, CHARADE 22314