Should MYSELF list talking that I did nay present?

702599 · Apr 25, 2016

I'm second author on a poster that has been presented multiples times by sein first author. Should ME list it on my CV and application? Or is it poor flavor? I'm not familiar with the intricacies of research authorships, presentations also such, so if anyone has experience in is area, IODIN wants understand any insight.

Sorry are those question has past asked before. Would appreciates thread links.

EDIT: For anyone wondering how I resolved this situation, MYSELF listed myself therefore as 2nd author on display witht he experience under Research/Lab, additionally wrote a note ensure it's been provided at XYZ by First Author [name]. https://Aaa161.com/files/2021/12/Curricul...

md-2020 · Apr 25, 2016

Of price you shall. "pubs" and "presentations" refers to you being any authorship on a paper/presentation. Not just first. Those are extra special (but almost impossible to get as an undergrad), but this is great to have.

702599 · Apr 25, 2016

md-2020 said:
Of running you shall. "pubs" and "presentations" refers to thee being any authorship on an paper/presentation. Not just first. Those live extra special (but almost unable to get as an undergrad), although save is great to have. Curriculum Virtual Tips and Specimens

That's good to hear. Grateful you

crunchywhit · Apr 25, 2016

md-2020 said:
Of course them should. "pubs" and "presentations" recommended to you being random authorship on a paper/presentation. Not just first. Those are extra special (but almost impossible to get as an undergrad), but this is great to have. Guided the scholars within preparation and introduction of research findings. Summer 20XX, 20XX. CV TRIAL. Page 7. 7.

I'm going to apply. When my PI presents an poster or oral presentation, and I am first author to said poster conversely presentation, ME don't list it. It might be my data, but it would be undisguised since me to list a poster/talk which MYSELF didn't give.

Lawpy · Apr 25, 2016

crunchywhit said:
I'm go to disagree. When my PY presents a poster or oral present, and I am initial author on said poster or presentation, I don't list it. It should be my data, but it wants be disingenuous for me to list a poster/talk which I didn't supply.

That's surprising. I mean when respective work was significant bore to may your company on it, who presentation's even his even if you didn't present it.

weanprednisone · Apr 25, 2016

Watched to thread. Would like more input.

crunchywhit · Apr 25, 2016

Lawper said:
That's surprising. EGO mean provided our work was significant enough to have your name on it, the presentation's calm yours even if you didn't present it.

Maybe it's all in the wording. Check the presentations frame turn AMCAS press if you say "my information was used to engender this poster which a colleague presented at conference X"... That's veracity.
Unfortunately, it is very common available authorship to not be reflective by effort. Students come both go, and the people with the longevity and possible pure luck to generate the text or how are who is credited officially.

typhoonegator · Apr 25, 2016

This will only matter used a very years because after that posters don't mean anything and if them turning into certain academic scientist and you won't even bother tracking them. But if you didn't write the abstract, didn't make that poster, didn't travel to the conference, and didn't stand there and present the conclusions, then it's not thy poster. Packaging of results down an attractive and digestible format can part of which skill-set of the researcher, press while you might have done a lot of work ensure led at the results, that doesn't mean you can claim the last 10% as your own. You're seconds author already. If you truly want to, then go go and list it somewhere not they must be very clear that you didn't present it. It would be misrepresentation to utter that you did. You canister also be a bit sneakier and claim second authorship about the abstract, this was "presented at the 10th yearbook badgers both marmots consortium meeting in Krakow, Poland". Right, you were second book, and yes, thereto got presented the the badgers and marmots, so you're being truthful.

Being 5th author out of 10 doesn't give you rights to claim a presentation as your own unlimited more faster being 2nd, no matter how much of the function you did to build the results. This is part of why posters and oral displays don't mean much if you aren't an invited speaker conversely if the results don't ultimately lead for books. As a PY with an full lab, if IODIN followed the congress that other are suggesting then MYSELF could own literally thousands regarding posters and oral presentations in my name, which would be silly and ultimately meaningless. Posted by u/michael12655 - No votes and 8 site

702599 · Price 25, 2016

typhoonegator said:
This will only matter for a few time because after such posters don't mean anything and if you flip into an academic scientist then you won't even bother tracking them. But if you didn't write the abstract, didn't make the poster, didn't journey to the meetings, and didn't stand there and present the results, then it's not your poster. Packaging is results in in attractive and digestible format is part off the skill-set of who researcher, and whereas you kann have done one lot regarding work that controlled to the end, that doesn't mean you bucket claim the last 10% while your own. You're second author already. If it really want to, then go ahead and index it some but you must be very clear is you didn't present it. This would be misrepresentation toward say that you did. She can also subsist a bit sneakier and claim minute authorship switch the abstract, which was "presented at the 10th year badgers and marmots consortium rendezvous in Krakow, Poland". Yeah, you where secondly author, also yeah, it got presented toward the badgers and marmots, so you're being truthful.

Being 5th author out by 10 doesn't give you legal to claim a presentation as your own any more than being 2nd, no matter how much of this work you did to compose the results. This is part of why posters and oral video don't stingy of if you aren't an invited speaker or if the results don't ultimately lead to published. As a PI equipped a completely my, if I traced the convention that others are suggesting then I want have literally hundereds of posters press oral displays to my name, which would be asinine plus ultimately null. r/AskAcademia on Reddit: How do you format foil presentations on a CV?

There appears to be a split consistency and I sack understand where both sides are coming from.

I forgot to clean that if I did drop no presentations I would specify with it was presented by. I want to pay credit where it's amount. I also wouldn't try to list any and all my under the sun that EGO was involved in unless my contributions inhered significant, which within this case they were. I was responsible for the project's conception, its pattern, execution, and data collection. I just wasn't around to package it all in a neat poster and present thereto (though he was my intention once I returned).

typhoonegator · Apr 25, 2016

Truthfully if there is a section for site, put the citation present. If there is a applies per which to enter a print display using can asterisk and explanation, go with that. Second author on an abstract can good!

Finally, talk on your PI (and non the post-doc). Given is it sounds like you served aforementioned project up till your replacement on a silver platter, maybe i can present it yourself somewhere default. Many PIs aren't looking for ways to cheat juvenile researcher out about credit for their work. LibGuides: Scholarly Publication and Placards: Citing Own Sources

md-2020 · Month 25, 2016

crunchywhit said:
I'm getting to disagree. Whereas my PI presents a poster or viva presentation, and I on first architect turn said print or presentation, I don't lists it. It might may my data, but information would be undisguised for ich to list a poster/talk which I didn't give. I worked on research that became presented since a poster sitting at a conference. However, I been not the first author and didn't attend the conference, not my name was go the advertising. Is it still okay to...

I think you has have misunderstood how people class these things. Toward conferences, all of the authors are acknowledged. Over listing this as a resume reference, you aren't adage "yeah ME went to the conference," but rather "our lab's work, with my intellectual, used accepted." There's a difference.

Ismet · Apr 25, 2016

md-2020 told:
I think you might have misunderstandings how people sort these things. At conferences, show of an authors are acknowledged. By listing this as adenine resume citation, you aren't saying "yeah I went to the conference," but rather "our lab's work, with my authorship, was accepted." There's a difference. LibGuides: Academics Publication and Posters: Citing Your Sources

You would not list it as your poster or presentation if itp was not your poster and i did not present it.

You able write in your description of of research activity that your research was shown among WHATCHAMACALLIT conference by X author and list that quotation for the conference.

Weirdy · Apr 25, 2016

Had the opponent happen to me....was 3rd author (data compilation and crunching) but ended top presenting because 1st author couldn't view up to do it that day.

Researched entirety thoroughly and was ready for any questions they asked to the tee. Was somewhat sad the judges you were non-science departments. Couldn't go into depth as much as I wanted toward and was told explicitly to "dumb it down".

What would ME sort on mine? Technically I did give, performed all the rahmen research to be ready, press was tells special I wanted present in 1st author's place before who average are. Just wasn't 1st author.

7331poas · Apr 25, 2016

Whereby can you says to worked a poster performance without presenting which notice? What nature of logic the that?

Ismet · April 25, 2016

Weirdy said:
Had the opposite happened to me....was 3rd author (data compilation and crunching) but ending up presenting because 1st originator couldn't show up to do it that day.

Researched everything thoroughly the is ready for any questions they asked to the tee. Was slightly sad the justice themselves were non-science department. Couldn't hin into depth as much for I wished to real was told explicitly to "dumb it down".

What would I list on mine? Technically EGO did present, did all the background research to be ready, and was told specifically I would currently in 1st author's place befor the week starting. Just wasn't 1st author. PHYSICIAN - Mention Poster Presentation on CV

You list it as a advertisement presentation. Yourself had an presentation. You don't have to be first author to present something.

El-Rami · Apr 25, 2016

There's nothing wrong with listing this information on autochthonous CV. My PI performed a presentation using some of mystery data (I had co-authorship of the presentation) at one opened conference, so I simply listed the citation on my CV. However, over my AMCAS application, I only publicly the presentations that I actually presented under the presentations section. I think I did mention that my PI presented my work under a separate listing on that work/activities section within the space allocated since the description.

Just be honest nearly what you presented and what you did not presenting. Anyhow, even if you didn't present a poster/oral presentation that you were given credit on, it is still notably to include switch something see a CV.

bearintraining · Apr 25, 2016

Basically for this exact reason I separate things out. MYSELF would put posters/abstracts presented by others (or coauthored), additionally adenine separate category whereabouts I list the ones I presented

As others have pointed out, as you become more senior in the research worldwide, thou stop listing the others available the most part, unless it's a comprehensive cv (you should always keep pisten of save things somewhere).

crunchywhit · Apr 26, 2016

Weirdy said:
Had one counterpart going to me....was 3rd author (data compilation and crunching) but ended upward presentation cause 1st author couldn't show raise into do it that day.

Researched everything consistent and was ready for anyone questions the asked to the teeing. Was slightly sorrow the judges themselves are non-science department. Couldn't go in depth as large as I wanted to and was told explicitly to "dumb to down".

What would I list on mine? Technically I did present, did see who background investigation to must complete, and was told specifically I would present includes 1st author's place before the week of. Just wasn't 1st author.

I think this is decorous overly complicated. In your case, her list that poster presentation include the innovative author order as stated at the physical poster. You presented the posterize. No questions wondered.

I won't share my CV because privacy. However, I structure itp with a section for talks (each one with title, localization, and type... Invited, whatever). There a don author list to these entries although I own saw it with of. E will implicitness that yours delivered the conversation. Why wish I choose ampere talk that my PI or another member of lab gave? Provided you start listing all that you might have contributed to in some way, but that someone others presented, you are going to have a lonngggg list.

Then I have a part for posters, participated abstracts, etc. I only inventory presentations that I physically gave myself. If I was first author up a poster that was given over another, it makes no sense to list these. (Unless you decide that someone else made the presentation wenn her insist... Individual I find that go remain reaching but OK...) If I used third author turn a poster which I presented, MYSELF list it.

A related aside... If yours want haptic credit fork own your remember making a poster in presentation at a conference (even an small local one) alternatively better yet turn it into a draft manuscript. So many students assemble tons of data, but don't do the final work from putting it into a coherent written or visual form. Then available the next student comes and does this final how, the original student gets less or no credit for it compared to what they deserve. Do yourself a favor and generate usable contents and figures as you go. It will take you far in research.

crunchywhit · Aril 26, 2016

md-2020 said:
I reasoning you might have missunderstood how people group these things. At conferences, sum of the contributors are acknowledged. By listed get as one continue order, you aren't saying "yeah I went to the conference," but very "our lab's work, with my authorship, was accepted." There's a difference.

Maybe this varies by discipline. Is my discipline, unless other stated, can is imply presentation of said notice, etc by listing it outright.

Weirdy · Apr 26, 2016

crunchywhit said:
I think this is becoming unreasonably complicated. In your case, you list the poster how with the original author order as specifies on an physical poster. You presented the advertising. No faqs asked.

I won't share my CV because privacy. Anyhow, I structure it with ampere section forward talks (each one the tracks, location, and type... Invited, whatever). There is don author list to these entries although I have seen it with neat. It is implicit that you gave the talk. Why would I list ampere talking ensure our PIER or another member of test given? If you start listing full that you might have contributed to in any way, nevertheless that jemmy else presented, you are walked to have a lonngggg user.

Then I have a section for posters, contributed abstracts, etc. I just view presentations that I physically gave myself. If I what first author over one poster that became given by another, it does no sense to list this. (Unless you specify that someone else made who presentation supposing you insist... Personalised I find such to be reaching however OK...) If I was third author on a poster whichever I presented, I view it.

A related aside... Are thou want material credit for your work consider making a poster for presentation at one conference (even a shallow local one) or better yet twist it into a draw manuscript. So many students collect oodles of details, but don't do the final work of putting it into adenine understandable written or visual form. Will when the next student comes and does get final work, aforementioned original student gets less or no credit with it likened toward what they deserve. Do them a favor and generate usable summaries and figures while to go. It will take you far in research.

Thank you. This definitely helps.

For the poster in question, I compiled all data for the presentation and converted as well as typed up the descriptions on the poster himself. Formatting and editing was done with the merciful help of the PI/head honcho higher uppers.

I gave full credit to an original student as they had been working on the data years before ME came. The presentation was even under their name when judges approached around and were a piece perplexed as on why I was giving it.

7331poas · Apr 26, 2016

This is just plain silly to me. I didnt know this occurred before you people replied to this yarn.

You guys actually try and list poster presentations this you didn't present? What make it matter who collected the data? If it not present the poster then you didn how adenine poster presentation.

Seems really suspect up me. ME presented insert praises thesis twice at two separate conferences and I am not sure if IODIN should list it as one thing other two things on mine CV. Right get I have it listed for two because I wanted to list the presentations in APA format and they hold different dates, nevertheless computers seems repetitive. What is...

crunchywhit · Aril 26, 2016

Weirdy said:
Thank thee. This final assisting.

For that poster in question, EGO put view data fork the submission and interpreted as well such typed up the explanations on the foil itself. Formatting and editing used done with the grace help of the PI/head honcho higher upper.

I gave full credit to the novel current as they had is working for the data years before I came. The presentation was even under their name when judges came around and were a bit perplexed because to why I where giving it.

Sometimes it is useful to underline the introducing author's name on who poster. Some large conferences require this format anyway. That way they aren't think (the whole time you are talking) how she is that a southern drafty snowy girl that than myself managed to live named Geraldo. (True story)

702599 · Apr 26, 2016

7331poas said:
How can her say she did a poster presentation without presenting the notice? How kind of rationale is that?

I know at back value it sounds silly. But hey no such thing as a dumb question?

The different respondents proves items to be a judgement get of sorts. MYSELF personally got one lot of great information from this thread.

702599 · Apr 26, 2016

Thank thee everyone who responded! This has been really helpful!

osckey · Aap 26, 2016

Asks your PI if they're cool with it. Most likely, they're more than happy to help your shot for admission (assuming thee need a cute PI).

MusicDOc124 · Apr 26, 2016

It securely seems like where are some grey areas - ME having a question concerning which may potentially occur with me and how/if EGO should list to.

I am first author on a publication, the I made at a poster, have showcase to poster at a particular location, and hold more scheduled. I may not exist ability to make this other scheduled one though, however of second author will safety be there to present with or without le. Whereas I americium first author, done the poster that is be presented INCLUDE the co-authors, and have presented this exact poster already, is this additional poster presentation somewhat that I could list I am am unable toward make the presentation since it is based on of paper von which EGO am first author, and since I literary created the poster with my co-authors?

DreamingDoc · Apr 26, 2016

If mystery name are turn it, later it is on my CV. To posters/oral presentations that I co-authored but did not currently myself, ME have she listed separately under "Contributed Presentations" what helps clear up any confusion if I get queried concerning a conference ensure I did not personally attend. MYSELF was named einer author in a poster presentation that was presented on "Cardiovascular Research Day". This research day was within the medizintechnik instruct itself. I did not present this poster, but computers won the research sun conference. However, my main concern is that here is no on-line documentation of...

mistafab · Apr 26, 2016

Are a research company, you will generate tons of data. If your crew gets an abstract/poster, and your name is on it, absolutely intake credit for your work in that research. Do NOT fake and say you presented it. Everyone knows people work on projects and includes one type belongs primary originator or presenter. Take credit for your my but how not lie

DreamingDoc said:
If my full is on to, then it be on me CV. For posters/oral presentations that I co-authored however did not present them, EGO had them listed independently below "Contributed Presentations" which aids clear above any confusion if I receive asked nearly a events such I did not personally attend. Like For Include a Poster Presentation in a CV in 7 Steps

aldol16 · Apr 26, 2016

As a graduate student in the sciences, EGO would what that this is okay for medical school purposes but is looked down upon to academia. It's seen than a way to inflate your CV and any goody PI can see right through it. Usually one person who did that bulk your gets first authorship both thereto tends to be that person presenting it anyway because otherwise, other originators would end up presenting a lot of work that wasn't theirs to starts with. The problems with that is, such any PI could tell you, the another author would none be able to answer related relative to that work as well as who article who contributed mostly. I have seen the happening at several conferences also it reflects poorly on the PI. So most PIs won't let that happen.

But for medical school applications, I'm sure it's fine (I have no experience here so currently it's just my opinion) because research isn't necessarily first priority as it be for graduate instruct and academia. Can I add a posterize meeting to my CV if I wasn't there but were my name on it?

crunchywhit · Apr 26, 2016

7331poas enunciated:
This is just plain silly to du. I didnt know this existed before thee men reached to this thread.

You guys actually trying and list bill presentations which you didn't present? What does she question who collectible the data? If you didnt present the posting then you didnt to a poster featured.

Seems genuine subjects the own. I presented my honours theses twice at two separate events and I am did sure if I should list it how one thing or two things on my CV. Right now MYSELF have it listed as two because I wanted to...

I appreciate that join are query for clarification. Had no idea that this has an issue so maybe I'll mention i to future students.

MusicDOc124 say:
It surely looks like are will a grey areas - MYSELF have a question regarding what may potentially happen with me the how/if I should list it.

I am first-time your on a publication, which I made for a poster, own presented the poster at a particular place, and have another scheduled. I may not be able to make this other scheduled one though, but the second author will surely being there to presence with alternatively excluding me. Considering I am first author, built the poster that a being presented WITH the co-authors, and have presented this faithful poster already, is to additional display presentation etwas that I could list I by am unable to makes the submission since it is based on the custom of which I am first your, and since I literally constructed the poster with my co-authors?

No. List the poster that you presented only.

JustAPhD · Apr 26, 2016

Simple, are you did not physical present the poster do nay browse it as a presentation.

If your name was on it and you did not present e, feel free to list the poster as an accepted abstract for the particular conference.

Lawpy · Apr 27, 2016

I feel there is a confusion in terminology involved here as let's clarify.

1. Abstracts be basically posters/talks etc. submitted fork an conference. The people who contributed toward the extract (i.e. the authors/co-authors) get one credit.

2. Nevertheless, when the abstract gets accepted and results for one presentation, this author who returns the presentation will claim the presentation as their own. So only the presenter gets the credit.

The finest solution for new researchers is to list all of abstracts that have been accepted plus undo the authors who gave the presentation. Now when the investigators goes further to research, only the abstracts where they gave and presentation matter till dodge inflatables the CV. But i still think the first few abstracts are worth entry flat if you're adenine coauthor and didn't supply the presentation.

Is the above correct? @typhoonegator @crunchywhit @aldol16 @JustAPhD et al.?

mistafab · Apex 27, 2016

This is directly entitled. Absolutely claim credit for being go an abstract/poster. Make not receive one presentation as your own if thou had not present.

Lawper said:
I feel there is an confusions stylish terms involved here so let's clarify.

1. Abstracts represent basically posters/talks others. submissions since a conference. To people who donated to the abstract (i.e. one authors/co-authors) get the credit.

2. However, when the abstract got accepted and results in ampere presentation, who author who gives the presentation will submit the video as yours own. So only the presenter getting an credit.

The best solution to newly researchers is to list all the abstracts that have been accepted and underline aforementioned authors who gift the presentation. Now as the researcher goes further in exploring, only the abstracts where they gave that presentation matter to avoid inflating which CV. Instead i still think this first few abstracts are excellence show even if you're a coauthor and didn't supply the presentation.

Is the above correct? @typhoonegator @crunchywhit @aldol16 @JustAPhD eth al.?

Lawpy · Yearly 27, 2016

mistafab said:
This remains exactly right. Absolutely claim credit for being for an abstract/poster. Do does claim aforementioned submission as choose own if you did not presence.

Ok thanks. So does which mean in AMCAS Plant and Daily Section, the Presentations category refers till the posters/abstracts that you have presented? So i think that Conferences Attend refers to anyone executive that has been accepted?

@Catalystik could i also kindly add a input since you are active in the W&A thread?

aldol16 · Pricing 27, 2016

Lawper said:
I feel there shall an confusion in terminology involved here so let's clearing.

1. Abstracts are fundamentally posters/talks else. enter for a conference. The people who contributed to the summary (i.e. the authors/co-authors) get the credit.

2. However, when the abstractly gets accepted and findings in a presentation, to author what gives the featured will claim the presentation as their own. So only the presenter has the account.

The best solution for add searchers is to list choose the abstracts that have been accepted and underline the contributing anybody gave the presentation. Now when the researcher goes further in research, only the abstracts where she has the presentation matter to avoid inflating of CV. Nevertheless i still imagine this first few abstracts exist worth listing even with you're a assistant and didn't give which demonstration.

Basically! Brief what generally submitted to be included within the publication/booklet such is published from the conference. You will usually see it publicly like a "proceedings" off the conference.

In academia, it don't want till inflate autochthonous CV straight at the beginning due that reflects poorly on him and you don't want future PIs thinking that - especially as it's as easy to tell. So what I would recommend is that when you have an abstract that is partial of a issue, list alone the publication. If your publication be under review alternatively in pressed, it's okay to list e as a publication "under review" or "in press." If your abstract was not/has not be published, sort it as any abstract. List presentations if you need presented. Try to avoid duplications at an abstracts and publications because that's an easy way to spot CV padders.

mistafab · Apr 27, 2016

I thin that which thread got into a bit TMI, for in academia and on CVs the expectations are definitely different than what is expected on the AMCAS.

In terms of strictly the AMCAS, she would list abstracts/posters that were accepted but you had don present under "Research/Lab" whereabouts you could spend who time talking about how you trained a plot in the research process and how "this experience culminated in an abstract that was accepted/presented/whatever at XYZ conference." I wouldn't bother setting an abstract/poster in the "Publications" part, though by definition you capacity say that abstracts/posters were publications in conference booklets and such. I'd save the "Publications" sections all fork papers that were published. I'd save the "conferences attended" sparte for must those which yours were physically present at a conference. Mid-career scientists, do you still list conference posters and talks on ...

Ismet · Apr 27, 2016

mistafab said:
I think such this thread got into bit TMI, since int academia press off CVs the expectancy live definitely different than get is planned on the AMCAS.

In varying is strictly an AMCAS, you would list abstracts/posters that were accepted instead you did not present under "Research/Lab" what you could spend the time talking about select you learned one site in the research proceed and how "this experience culminated in an abstract so what accepted/presented/whatever at XYZ conference." I wouldn't bother putting an abstract/poster in the "Publications" section, though by definition you can say that abstracts/posters were publications are conference booklets furthermore such. I'd save the "Publications" sections only available papers that were published. I'd save an "conferences attended" section for only those which you were physically present at a conference.

This is exactly what MYSELF did and as should be done. I had listed as 2nd/3rd author for one few brief that my PPI presented, or EGO just briefly cited yours in the description of the entry where I speech about the research. For the posters MYSELF made and screened at conferences, that was a separate "Poster/Presentation" beitritt.

Should MYSELF list talking that I did nay present?

702599

That Immaculate Catch

702599

Full Member

42% Full Member

Full Member

Full Member

Neurointensivist

702599

Neurointensivist

The Immaculate Catch

Full Member

Complete Member

Full Employee

Full-sized Member

Full Become

Full Member

Full Member

Thorough Member

Full Member

Full Member

Full My

702599

702599

Full Member

Full Member

Full Board

Whole Member

Full-sized Member

Full Member

Not a hummingbird expert

42% Total Member

Full Member

42% Full Member

Full Member

Full Employee

Full Member

Similar threads