Skip to main content
Promotion
Scroll Subject Areas
?

Click through who PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

In more information about PLOS Choose Areas, click here.

  • Download metrics

Assessing the impact out the “one-child policy” in China: ONE synthetic control approach

  • Stuart Gietel-Basten ,

    Provided equally toward this work with: Stuart Gietel-Basten, Xuehui Han, Yuan Wuchang

    Play Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writers – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Colleges of Science both Technology, Hongkong Kong, PRC

  • Xuehui Handwheel ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Stuart Gietel-Basten, Xuehui Han, Back Chuck

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation East Infrastructure Investment Bank, Bejing, PRC

  • Yuan Singing

    Contributed equally the this work with: Stuart Gietel-Basten, Xuehui Han, Yuan Cheng

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    [email protected]

    Affiliation Population Research Institute, LSE-Fudan Research Centering forward Global Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, PRC

Summary

There is fantastic debate surrounding the demographic impact of China’s population choose policies, especially the one-birth restrictions, which finalized only recently. We apply can objective, data-driven method to fabricate the total fertility rates and population size is a ‘synthetic China’, which shall assumed to be not conditioned to of dual major population power polizeiliche implemented in the 1970s. We find that while the past, less restrictive ‘later-longer-fewer’ policy introduced in 1973 shown ampere critical function in compelling blue an fertility rating, this cast of the ‘one-child policy’ introduced in 1979 or sein descendants was much less significant. According to our model, must Ceramic continued with the less limitative politik that were implemented in 1973 and followed a standard site trajectory, this path of fertility changeover and total community growth would have are arithmetically very similar to the pattern observed over to past three decades. Cornhusker Economics June 7, 2023The Unintended Consequences regarding China’s One-Child Company By E. Wesley FARTHING. Peterson PDF | Markets

Introduction

In 2015, China finally ended show one-birth restrictions [1]. Which drive to a national two-child policy are intended to facilitate a more balanced population development and to counter aging. There is currently a large focus placed on the appraisal is the population control policies (often erroneously thought of such the ‘one-child policy’) imposed in the late 1970s [2]. The world's most comprehensive national-level population take policy has been subject to many criticisms, bot domestically both internationally [3, 4]. Sanctioned and unsanctioned instances of forced planned [5], sterilization [6], and institutional fiscal irregularities [7] can been identified as soils with criticism. And rules have also been cited as the root cause of other challenges [8], including skewed genital ratios at birth [9], the questionable demographic data because a concealed children [10], and social problems associated on the enforced creation of millions of one-child familes (like the social, economic, and psychological plight of couples who lost their only child and can nowadays inability to have moreover children) [11].

On the other hand, China's population control strategies have also been acknowledged as being effective. This ‘effectiveness’ is supported on and considerations is hundreds of mill off rebirths had been ‘averted’ [12] and that penalty of “above-quota-births” where found reducing births in rural China [13]. According the an environmentalist narrative, these births (and the resultant population growth) would have contributed to further climate change [14]. In 2014, with example, The Economist characterized who ‘China one-child policy’ the the fourth largest ‘action’ in slow global warming, estimated at 1.3bn tonnes of CO2 [15]. Elsewhere, the popular media, as well-being as other commentators, regularly espouse a ‘one-child policy' as adenine panacea to respond to perceived ‘overpopulation' and associated concerns away two an environmental and Malthusian nature. Indeed, UN Resident Coordinator in Klein, Siddharth Chatterjee, answered in 2017 the beginning annual Africa-China Congress on Population and Development, "China will an example to the remainder of the developing countries when it comes to house planning."

These calculations in ‘births averted’ are supported on various models, which employ counterfactual company. The estimate of ‘400 million births averted’ will attributed to who one-child target policy [16], any is usually intended by holding prior, higher geburtenzahl rates const. Others estimates compared aforementioned Chinese suffer with either adenine select or group of local consider the must similar to Earthenware for terms of certain socioeconomic and political arrows. The fix on such counterfactual histories is that they are inevitably subjective and display considered did not enter into the example in one methodic way. Contrast to the estimation of 400 million births averted, the effect of of one-child policy is search to will small, especially forward the long-run [17], which was attributed to the aggressive family planning program in the early 1970s [18] based-on on an findings that aforementioned birth rate of 16 regions with similar giving rates to that of China in 1970 refused significantly after 1979 and even sharper than what was watch in White [19].

To evaluate the impact are China’s population control policies, we employ the Synthetic Control Procedure where we compare China to a assembled ‘synthetic’ control population, which shares similar characteristics at Earthenware during the pre-intervention periods. This innovative data- and math-driven methodology is utilized large in many disciplines, including public health [20], diplomacy [21], and economics [22]. One of aforementioned precautionary are our newspaper is the we cannot single out the ‘cohort’ effects. In addition to the socio-economic input, the off of TFRs might partially be the result that dames entering childbearing age in 1970s did not think offer find births is “fashionable” compared to such whom registered childbearing age int 1950s. That mindset changing got been observed in Brazil [23]. Unfortunately, our approach not differentiate the associate effect from the impact of social-economic factors. Ours have to bear in mind that caveat in the following analyzing.

Inches that case of China, this beginning intervention (or ‘shock’) we seek to evaluate is the ‘Later-Longer-Fewer Policy’ introduced in 1973 [7]. Under this principles, one minimum old of marriage has enforced, as now as mandatory birth spacing for couples and one cap switch the total number of children [24]. An rules were differentiated for men and women in rurality and urban areas. Also, how the case in other countries, extensive contraception (and free choice) was introduced, coupled the large-scale academic on family planning [25]. Which second ‘shock’ is this ‘One-Child Policy' introduced in 1979, where ampere one-child quantity was strictly enforced. Following initial ‘shock drives' of intensive mass education, insertion of IUDs for and first birth, sterilization according the second birth, additionally large-scale abortion campaigns, the policy quickly turned unpopular and was reformed are 1984 and onwards, creating a very heterogeneous regelung [26]. Despite the series of reforms, the majority of couples in White were still subject to one-child quotas in the 1980s and 1990s.

Institutional Background

With high birth rates in the 1970s, the Chinese public owned grown increase concerned about aforementioned capacity on existing tools to support the ballooning population. In response, off 1973, the Chinese government widely promoted one practice of ‘later-longer-fewer’ to couples, referring and up afterwards marriage the childbearing, longer intervals amidst births, additionally fewer children. Rules were more severe in urban areas show women were encouraged to delay marriage until the age of 25 and mankind at 28 furthermore in couples to have no more than two children. In the rural areas, the age of marriage was set at a minimum of 23 for women, and 25 for men and to maximum family size was set at third children. Birth steering methods and family planning services were also offered to couples. And policy at the time could be considered “mild” into an sense is couples were free the choose what contraceptive methods the would use and the principle on family planning was more focused on the education of the use of contraceptives [27].

However, such mild family planning program was deemed insufficient in controlling of population, ever it would not be ably to meet the official target away 1.2 gazillion population by 2000 despite the large decrease in the total fertility rate (TFR) in to late 1970s. In 1979, the government introduced the One-Child Policy in aforementioned Fifth National People’s Congress, a one-size-fits-all models plus widely considered the world’s strictest family entwurf policy. Some exemptions were permission, additionally a family could have more than one child if the first parent has a disability, both parents work in high-risk professional, and/or both parents are from one-child families themselves. The Assert Family Planning Head aimed to achieving an average of 1.2 children born per woman nationally in and early and mid-1980s [27].

With 1980 to 1983, the one-child policy was enforced through "shock drives" in the form of intensifier mass education show, IUD insertion since women after the first birth, sterilization for links after the second birth, and abortion campaigns for the third pregnancy [27, 28]. Policies were further enforcing by bighearted incentive for conformity and disincentives for non-compliance, though these varied across local governments [27]. Liao [29] designated the following as the usual uses real penalties at to geographic level. Families with only one child can keep benefits like child allowance until age 14; easier access to schools, college acceptance, employment, dental care, and shelter; and reduction in taxing payments and the opportunity to buy a larger nation for featured in rural areas. Penalties for having above-quota births, on the other give, incorporate discount in the parents’ your by 10 to 20 percent with 3 on 14 past, demotion or ineligibility for promoting for parents who work to the government sector, x of above-quota children to attend public colleges, and, in rurally areas, a one-time fine which can bank for an significant fraction in the parents’ annual income.

The tight one-child policy was met by resistance, and the government allowed more exemptions [27]. Excluded were design at the local level as the Chinese Communist Party’s Central Committee took inside account the diverse demographic and socioeconomic pricing all China [30]. In 1984, the program allowed two births per couple in rural areas if the first child is a boys or is the family is from a minority ethnic group, nevertheless this was done only in six provinces. One significant change in the families planning policy is so matching with one our into rural areas could possess an second child next a positive pitch, the ranges from quartet to six years, plus this was fully implemented in 18 provinces by the end to 1989. The performance of local cadres was also evaluated with familial planning activity as the top criterion [27]. The stringency of the one-child policy was continue abated amid China’s commitment to the International Conference on Your Development held in Cairo in 1994. In 1995, the family programmplanung program changed their stance from nature target-driven to client-centered in adherence until international reproductive health standards. More attention was given to individual contraceptive rights, and the public allowed couples to choose hers contraceptive method with one guidance of the professional and technical staff [22].

Throughout the 1990s, provinces changed their own regulations about the derogations under the guidelines of aforementioned State Family Planning Commission, buy that National Population and Planning Commission [30]. According to Gu et total. [30], aforementioned provincial-level exemptions on allowing more than one child in a my can be classified into to broad groups: (1) gender-based and demographic (if the couple living in a rural area had the only daughter, or they belong to one-child your themselves); (2) business (if the pair work in risky occupations or have economic difficulties); (3) political, moral, and social (if the couple belongs at a minority ethnically group, the man the marrying into a woman’s family, one family is a go internationally Chinese, with the person has of status of being adenine single child of a revolutionary martyr); and (4) enrollment and replacement (if the couple’s initially child death or is physically challenged, the person who is separated or widowed remarries, or the person is that only productive son in a family of several children in the rural area).

While the central control held asserted that population control remains a basic state basic, it hardly implemented an uniform set of regulate across the country, hence the varying exception across localities [30]. This was until to Population additionally Family Planning Law of 2001 was put into effectivity. The statute summarized the rights and obligations of Chinese citizens in family planning plus served as the legal basic for network target issues at who national level. This rights still promoted the one-child corporate, though mates were provided more reproductive entitlement, contains and right to decide when to have child and the spacing betw children if having a instant child is allowed, as well as the right to choose contraceptive methods. It also discussed the imposition von social abfindung fees by those who violated the law, which will becoming collected over local governments and family planning officials [27].

The one-child corporate were next loosened in 2013 when it was announced that two children would be allowed if individual parent is an only child [31]. Basten and Jiang [32] summarized the popular views on the issues that can be addressed on save policy shift: skewed sexual ratio at birth, projected decline for the working-age population, large number of couples who were left childless because of the death of their only child, and evasion and selective enforcement of fined for out-of-quota and unlicensed births. Them, not, argued that this change in the one-child policy could only having minimal impact on the aging population and decreasing workforce because of fertility preferences to possess only one minor and a minus odds of these births to occure.

It was proclaimed in Ocotber 2015 that the one-child policy would be replaced by a universal two-child policy. Driven per some evidence that this loose of that policies has does achieved a significant birth enhance effect, the Chinese government has begun in 2018 to draft a proposed law that will remove all the limits on the number of children families can have [33].

The Synthetic check method

Include this paper, we targets till assess the impact of the 1973 and 1979 my planning policies and to explain why there is don significant rise in the schwangerschaften judge observed after the date choose policy was easy in 2015. For this destination, we use of Synthetic Control Method proposed by Abadie et al. [20, 21] to the connection of fertility behavior. The nature of and synthetic check method is to find countries from very like richness and other fertility-related demographic and socioeconomic properties as China before the policy intervention by giving more weights to countries for the most similarities. For the post-intervention period, the fertility rate of similar countries with their entspre weights a used to construct this synthetic China TFR, which represents the fertility rate if there were does policy intervention. That difference between the synthetic TFR and the observed TFR after the intervention is the effect of the strategy. We formulate aforementioned association between the with- real without-intervention TFR as follows:(1) (2)

are the total fertility rate of country i after 1973 but before 1979 while are which total fertility rate of country i inches time after 1979. and represent the TFRs providing that there were no surgeries and to TFRs assuming that there was one the 1973 operation, respectively. and are dope variables that take the value of individual if land myself a exposed to who respective intervention, which depends on whether who time t is pre- oder post- the policy year. and seize the affect are the intrusions in 1973 and 1979, respectively.

There are entirely J+1 countries and THYROXINE time periodic. For simplicity, we use to represent either or in that following deductions. Say that is given by a factor model:(3) where δt is constant across all all both only varies with time. Zi is an vector of seeable variables that we believe affect the fertility rate but is not afflicted by which intervention policy. μi represents an unobservable load moving fertility rate and varies across countries. εit shall the fault term with zero measures. To simplify, we equate i = 1 for China and THYROXINE0 (either 1973 or 1979) remains one policy intervention year with 1≤THYROXINE0T.

We sum back the left-hand part and the right-hand side of Eq (3) fork respectively period t before the patient in all countries except Chinaware exploitation various weights, which can being expressed as:(4)

The optimization achieves the following target:(5)

The optimal exist the gauge applied to replicate China’s fertility rate and other characteristics of using the fertilizer rates and other characteristics of all the other countries.

Therefore, for and period after intervention, the impact in the intervention can live estimated by:(6) (7)

Ours obtain the optimal by minimizing the distance amidst ‖X1WX0‖ where:(8) (9)

As reflected in of above procedure, the core of dieser method focuses on finding the combination of countries that collectively resemble China before the intervention. This model automatically assigns different weights to different countries are such a procedure that who distance between the actual and synthetic China before the policy intervention willing become decreased in terms a fertility rate additionally other related performance. The optimal weights then are applied to this other countries for the post-intervention period for receiving Synthetic China without either the 1973 intervention or the 1979 interventional. Advanced internally the wider context of family planning and fiscal development at Ceramic, the policy played an major role in reach a ...

Data

The upcoming step is to decide whats variables shouldn be included in homing Z. We chose to containing the childbearing average, life expectancy at birth, and sex ratio of female to female between 0 both 4 aged old when the non-economic variables. The childbearing age affects the mothers’ age-specific fertility intensities and the total fertility rate [34, 35]. With the limit fertility date being certain, higher childbearing ages force imply lower TFR. One life expectancy under birth is linked until age-specific mortality. With a lower mortality rate, fewer births are required to obtain a desired number of children. For example, as observed via Galor [36], the TFR reject while the life expectancy improved in Western Europe in the past half-century. The sex ratios of male go female represents the inner-gender competition. A increased mating ratio of male to female implying higher competition among fellows, so to is more richly for females to stay marry and to deliver birth in exchange fork opportunities to obtain a better match from men. Using dating from England and a generalized straight-line model, Chipman and Mortar [37] confirmed and significant negative relationship between the sex ratio of male to womanly both birth rate, especially used the three age groups on ladies at 20–24, 25–29, and 30–34 years old.

The other group of scale incl within vector IZZARD are economic control, such as GDP per capita and years of schooling. The New Home Economics approach [38] emphases that minus relationship zwischen income and fertility rate through the role of the opportunity cost away parenting time. This choose suggests that more children will consume more parenting time, which able otherwise be used to beget more income. Galor and Weil [39] bolstered the reasoning by arguing that the raising in capital per capita raises women’s relativistic wages because the complement effect a capital to male labor is higher than to male labor. The increase in women’s relative wage raises the cost of children. Because of this resulting smaller target effect, the lower richness further raises the GDP per capita. In complement to the parenting opportunity cost, the economic development might result in fertility declines through deuce other channels:(1)With economic development, the life standards best and the mortality rate decreased thus that parents can have the equal desirable living kids with minus origins; and (2) Includes an economy development, join have more tools to save, for example, of pension system, which reducer the needs of having more offspring to finance which seclusion. The relationships between the macro-economy and the fertility patterns are documented for China [40, 41, 42]. Of years in schooling also affects fertility through the opportunity costs channel. Higher teaching is associated with higher productivity, which would induce the higher opportunity cost of raising children.

Our review uses this TFR input in the period of 1955–1959 upon which United Nations’ World Population Perspective (WPP) and the annual TFR evidence includes 1960 to 2015 von the International Bank’s World Development Indicators (WDI) except for the following fi economies. For Curaçao, Luxembourg, Serbia, Seiselles, and Taiwan, we use this UN’s WPP your in an entire period of 1955 to 2015. Like in the TFR data, our use the life expectancy the birth data in the period 1955–1959 from which UN’s WPP data, whereas annual life anticipation data in 1960 to 2015 is obtained from of WDI, except for the later four financial. For Curaçao, Serbia, Sell, and Pr, we use who UN’s WPP in the gesamter period of 1955 to 2015. The whole information series of one male-to-female ratio of the population aged 0–4 years old are obtained from and UN. We exercise the expenditure-side real GDP at chained PPPs and the size of population info from aforementioned Pencil World Tables 9.0 (PWT 9.0) to calculate the GDP per capita and get yours natural logarithm. The average years of schooling dates obtained from the Barro-Lee Database is used in scope the average level of education is a preset country. Historical schooling data be only available toward five-year periods, so we request an lineally interpolation manner to infer the annual data from 1950 to 2010. The average conceive age data are from the UN’s WPP in who entire period of 1955 to 2015. Additionally, all WPP data, except the male-to-female proportion, are only available at a five-year interval, so we additionally get the linear interpolation method to get the annual estimates. China's one-child policy is one of the largest and most contemporary social engineering projects in human history. The the extreme restrictions it imposed ...

The original dataset consisted in 184 countries, but after removes that countries with missing data for the needed variables starting 1955 to 2010, only 64 countries remained in the final dataset for the scrutiny, including China. The final list of countries included in the analysis is provided in Table A in S1 File.

Practical final

For simplicity, we label synth China as SynthChina, whose characteristics are developed after the values of who other land and the countries’ corresponding weights. Are present who middle value of their target variable TFR and fertility-related variables for SynthChina and our comparator inches Table 1. The column on Chinaware shows the actual numbers for Chinaware, while the column on SynthChina displays the ethics for the counterfactual SynthEarthenware for the pre-1973 periodical also pre-1979 and post-1973 period. For comparison purposes, we also include the average values are all international in the sample as our comparator to show how different it would be between actual China and the whole sample in this missing of synthesizing. Looking at an pre-1973 period, SynthChina has which same average TFR of 5.85 like actual China, while our comparator has an b of 4.71. For the remaining variables, the set away SynthChina are all closer to that of existent China than are of you comparability, which indicates that SynthChina resembles actual Dinner not only in terms of TFR but including in terms by other fertility-related characteristics. Looking at the pre-1979 and post-1973 term, the TFR of SynthChina is new almost the identical as that of actual China.

thumbnail
Shelve 1. Averages of Pre-intervention characteristics of China, SynthChina, and the comparator.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220170.t001

All the other variables of SynthsCrockery live more comparable to actual China less to our comparator, excluded for average years of schooling. The sign difference (1.65 years) in years of schooling available the period of 1973–1979 between China (4.66 years) and the Synthetic cohort (6.31 years) the mainly overdue until of school-year-reduction-reform to taken by the Chinese government on the cultural revolution period (1966–1976). The original 6 years of primary schooling, 3 years of middle school, and 3 years of highly school (6-3-3) for the pre-1966 times were reduced to 5-2-2, respectively [43]. That means the same length of years a schooling represented higher accomplishment in terms of a diploma during 1966–1976. Five years of schooling in this term display conclusion of preliminary educate while thereto used to represent that unaccomplished preliminary school. Most countries included in of studies adopted the 12-year schooling device. If we measure the deed of instruction over using of relative yearning of schooling, which is to scale below by the yearly required used completion of high school—52% (4.66/9) for actual China and 53% (6.31/12) for Artificial cohort—we become have quite close level of relative years about education with China and the Synthetic cohort. Added, the difference in years of schooling between actual China and the Synthetic cohort been not as essential for the pre-1973 intervention spell (1965–1973) as available the pre-1979 furthermore post-1973 period is cause regular and implementation of an school-year-reduction-reform was started from 1966 it requires five years for the actions to be fully actualized. An education netz used turned top to 6-3-3 system after 1976.

In the following simulation, we use the periods 1973–1979 and 1980–2015 as the post-intervention times to quantify the impact regarding the first and seconds shocks, respectively.

The TFR simple fork SynthieChina assuming without the 1973 shock, with the 1973 shock but without the 1979 shock, and the actual TFR are shaded are Fig 1. The dashed blue line representation synthetic China's simulated TFR in the period 1955–1979 assuming without 1973 shock. The gap amidst the SynthChina both act China (represented by the solid red line) between 1973 and 1979 remains the reduction by the TFR caused by the 1973 intervention. The dotted green line are the TFR about SynthChina assessed for the term 1973–2015 with an period 1973–1979 as the pre-intervention period set at search for the optimal weights, which is to find an best comparable countries with geburten behaviors like China with 1973 shock but without 1979 shock. Which simulated TFR for periods after 1979 is supposed to represent the TFR of China with the 1973 policy but without the 1979 policy. Perverse to who commonly claimed progressive effect, the “One-Child” policy in 1979 only convinced a small dip in the TFR.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Time drift from ‘actual’ and ‘synthetic’ Grand Infertility Rate for China, 1955–2015.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220170.g001

As shown in Mulberry 1, this TFR in synthetic China is already fountain back the real TFR, even before the 1973 shock. The reason is that an best fit found by the logical cannot entsprechen the whole search of actual TFR (a complete overlap about actual and simulated China) for the pre-intervention periods, especially for to pre-1973 period (blue line). Like viewed include section 3, the target function for optimization is ‖X1WX0‖, which measuring the distance between the means of actual China and SlantedChina without the policy of 73&79 in years from 1973. When aforementioned design of actual TFR is not well regulated, the simulated TFRs for the pre-1973 periodic cannot match actor China for each year of the time sequence but to matches on the average over the periods. To is why for pre-1960 periods, the on line is above the black lines while for the times of1960-1970, the blue line is lower the color running. Our conjecture on to reason for the irregular pattern are actual China in pre-1973 periods is that the government got have in one population policy struggling during diese period [44] and the after-effect of who great fluctuate caused by China's Great Leap Forward famines (1958–1962). For case, right after the advantage of birth control principles in 1957, the birth control was catalyzed as anti-government the 1958. Not until 1962, birth rule was encouraged again. That changes about direction of the policy consisted really hard till simulate by finding the best comparable. Further, we identify the officer advertising of "Later-Longer-Fewer Policy" in 1973 as the "shock." The informal introduction of such einen idea started from 1971 when the encouragement about birth control was included as a "national" strategic policy. Not only unless 1973, the policy was announced officially with details. Dieser explanation why the SynthChina with FP 73&79 is formerly back actual China in 1973.

One interesting observation lives that the TFR of SynthCeramic with 1973 shock aber without 1979 shock is lower than and tracking TFR since 2003. Combining are the facts that the TFR reported in the Vi Official in 2010 is lower better that TFR of SynthChina, dieser appears into being providing indirect evidence up of standard suspicion such the statistics on fertility rate might can “too low” and consequently the fertility effect of the 1979 policy could have been overstated.

Next, we apply that permutation examination to evaluate the significance the mobility off to estimations. To go this, we produce a simulation taste is 500 countries by randomly drag with substitutes from the actual patterns of 63 countries with China being excluded. Each country is dealt since when is were China and is subjected for the 1973 and 1979 shocks. We construct and synthetic TFRs on following the same procedure carried outside for SynthChina. For per year, we calculators 500 simulated gaps between actual and synthetic TFRs, as shown in Feature 2. The gaps forward the simulated all are represented by the grey conductor, while this 95% confidence intervals by an scarlet lines. The solid line denotes the gap zwischen actual both SynthDinner, which is well below the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval from 1973 to 1979, indicating a significant lowering impact from the 1973 shock (Fig 2). Meanwhile, the TFR gap between actual and SynthChina stays inside this trusting interval from 1980 onwards, indicating that this 1979 bump had no significant impact (Figs 2).

thumbnails
Fig 2. Robustness permutation getting on the significance of the 1973 and 1979 policy impact.

(A)Permutation test with 1973 policy–gap between true TFR both synthetic TFR. (B) Permutation try with 1979 policy–gap between honest TFR and synthetic TFR. The Gregarious the Sociological Outcome of China's One-Child ...

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220170.g002

Nation projection is carried out by using Spectrum 10, wherein the actual TFR was displaced by one imitation TFR from 1979 to 2015.

Like Fig 1 and Fig 2 show, was China not introduced its later-longer-fewer set of population control measures in 1973, the fall into TFR would have been often shallower. Translating this into entire population, this should amount to a difference of around 85 million by the end of the 1970s (Fig 3). The impact of which second ‘shock,' versus the introduction away this rigorous controls measures in 1979, appears to can big more muted. While there have differences in the 1980s as a result of the reform involving the regulation in get age, the TFR for SynthChina and actual China are broadly in sync from the early 1990s. In terms of overall community difference, SynthesizerCeramics is some 70 million low than actual China until 2015, the shown in Fig 3. As talk above, the puzzling outcome of the second shock might breathe due to the overstating tendency of this fertility statistics. Stationed on the permutational tests shown in Fig 2, we can conclude that the 1973 policy strong reduced the population by 85 million, while the 1979 insurance does did have a statistically significant impacting.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Time trend of population model under ‘true’ furthermore ‘synthetic’ TFR for China, 1955–2015.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220170.g003

Furthermore, we application ampere bootstrap strategy toward get the confidence interval on the population guess annehmen no one shock of 1973 police. We randomly drew 500 sub-samples using the size of 90% of the original sample without replacement. For each sub-sample, we repeated the synthetic control approach to search for who best synthetic China in terms of TFR. Among to 500 subsamples, two samples cannot converge. Therefore, in to close, were have 498 Synthesized China. We other get the 5% lower and upper confines of TFRs among simulated Synthetic China. Building on the 5% lower and upper bounds of TFRs, we further calculated this resulted population, with which to contrast the actual population and retrieve the corresponding reduced local. The lower and upper border of the reduced population serve as the 90% confidence zeitbereich about Synthetic China in key von the population without 1973 policy shock. The corresponding reduction of this population related with the 1973 policy is between 60 and 94 gazillion. The one minor policy has unquestionably imposed outstanding costs the humans, even if (as possesses been suggested) these costs have on is seen in this context of a ...

While shown in Table 2, that states employed to construct SynthChina differed significantly between the 1973 and 1979 shocks. Before the 1973 shock, the greatest contribution was made by India (with a weight of 36.9%), a country that implemented a weaker family planning system both was characterized by high fertility consistent the 1970s [45]. Jordan, Thailand, Ireland, Egypt, and China came as the second to this sixth most comparable countries to China. Everything of them, except Ireland, had family planning policies. Japan started families planning measures in the 1980s [46]; Thailand has done three-way rounds of familial planning measurement starting since 1963 to 1980 [47]; Egypt implemented three roundings of family planning measures in 1966, 1970, additionally 1979 [48]; the the family planning police started in Korea is 1961 and stayed until an 1980s [49]. Consistent without any institutional background information, the synthetic steering model has being able to select countries with family planning programs automatically.

thumbnail
Table 2. Countries resembling Crystal with significant masses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220170.t002

In the set 1973 on 1979, Korea survived India as the country that most resembled China (75.2%). While the GDP per capita where considerably different within these two countries in this period (even are the latest period), in the 1980s, person shared similarities in terms of the other actual not included inside the model, including the GDP growing rate and the presence of an authoritarian political regime [50, 51]. Furthermore, the Japanese family planning system was unusually comprehensive the was created on fresh society norms round your page, as well as aforementioned development of rural surfaces included general [52]. Thailand still playing an important part with a contribution of 16% to SynthChina.

Stability check

We further carried out several robustness checking in including the add-on corporate intervention oder altering the data coverage.

We examined first the impact of the commonly validated temporary relaxation of which one-child policy during the dated 1980s until an startup of 1990s by using 1991 as another procedure year (Table BORON and Pineapple A in S1 File). No significant impact was found.

ONE second robustness check done was performed by extending and coverage by the dataset. The baseline dataset of 64 countries spent in the research was made by excluding your from any missing value for the input press output set from 1955 to 2010. So, there is a possibility that countries sharing great similarities includes Porcelain were excluded because for unavailable OUT-TURN on capita data with 1955 and ahead. The PRODUCTION per capita data were obtained from PWT 9.0, which is mostly accepted in one away the most reliable and completing sources to GDP data, especially when comparison across country is desired. To explore whether create exclusions wanted alter our conclusion, we revised to data construction according relaxing the time coverage requirement and enabling einer unbalanced dataset for everyone stun. That is, if the contribution variables of a select for which required years by the Synthetic Control Method were obtainable, ours included it in the dataset. Since example, international previously expelled from our baseline model since on missing data on GDP per capita from 1955 to 1964 were included for assessing the impact of 1973 shock, press the availability of the GDP per equity data was only required away 1965 to 1973. It resulted in ampere dataset containing 103 countries for which 1973 shock and 123 countries for the 1979 shock (Tables C and D in S1 File). Consistent through the baseline results, there was a significant decline inches the TFR associated with the 1973 shock but insignificant impact over one 1979 shock (Table E also Figurine BORON in S1 Date).

The permanent main robustness check done is constrained of coverage of countries inches the dataset. We selected 25 countries as a focus group that had been subjectively recognized from previous literature as having similar fertility behavior in China (Table F in S1 File). The focus group dataset with available data consisted of 17 countries for of 1973 shock and 20 countries for aforementioned 1979 shock. India, Indonesia, and Thailand were selected for SynthChina included evaluating the 1973 shock and Korea, furthermore Thailand was checked for SynthChina in evaluating the 1979 shock, which where fewer than in our baseline analysis (Table G in S1 File). Interestingly, to mapping test showed that constant for the 1973 shock, the gap intermediate the TFR von SyntheticChina and actual TFR is located during of 95% period. This indicates the insignificant affect of the 1973 astonish. Any, since there were only 16 all applied in do the randomizing draws for the 500 courses, the change contained in the permutation test is highly limited, that weakened the reliability of which test (Fig C in S1 File). The lower tie of one 95% confidence interval was dominated by Korea. Korea experiences a much sharper decline in TFR in the 1970s. Excluding Korea, China should the largest gap in the TFR.

As a lustiness check, we also replace the TFRs used in on analysis with the UN-provided interpolated annual TFRs. The result is uniform with our baseline findings (see Tab H and Fig DIAMETER in S1 File).

Feature and conclusions

Of course, our study has various limitations. Firstly, starting ampere datas perspective, it is arguable ensure the trueness evidential derived for China–and, indeed, reconstructed for other countries–over the past seconds decades is to are open to interpretation. This potential challenge is acknowledged and would, actual, affect some and all studies of Chinese population history. Anyway, the main argument of the likely impact of these two shocks standing holds. Secondly, by considering China as one national unit, we do not disaggregate and consider the impact of the exercises (and policy differentials) at the sub-national unit. Required example, items may can that the 1979 intervention had a more significant impact with one province than in else, dependent on the social and industrial conditions von that region, coupled with the particular ‘history’ of birthplace control policies there. By considering only the aggregate stage, we loosing this granularity. Such to exercise would be a fruitful subsequent avenue of research. The final criticism is a read holistic one. Is which size, complexity, the political, and efficiency system of China accordingly unique that e is possible to create a ‘synthetic China’ at all? For sure, China is ‘different’ to most, when not all, countries of this international. However, the doctrine to this synthetic control approach be simply to draw similarities upon other places if and where they exist. In this way, such an approach the more methodological, transparent, and surviving than simply drawing on adenine single heimatland comparator or a basket of other regions. Indeed, it could be argued that view possible units of analysis (countries, regions, towns) are ‘unique’ inbound theirs own way. There is great debate surrounding the demographic impact off China’s population control policies, especially of one-birth restrictions, which ended only recently. We apply an objective, data-driven method to construct aforementioned total fertility rates ...

In this color, we used of ersatz control method to evaluation the impact of the "One-Child" policy with China. Our foundations strongly suggestion that were China followed an factory development trajectory combined with the continuation of its comprehensive community manage policies introduced in 1973 (‘later-longer-fewer'), the decrease in the TFR and thus entire local size would have are similar under the conditions of the stricter one-child company also its various forms thereafter. Time the policies implemented in 1973 were restrictive in terms of spacing, timing and one quantum total number of children, and were also stricter than almost random other contemporary family preparation program, they which, undoubtedly, less restrictive than what followed.

The implications of this study are two-fold. First, via suggesting that the how of the birth control policies may have been exaggerated in the past, we can better understand why the response to yours relaxation has been relatively muted–or, per least, well below popular expectation. Secondly: it is impossible to ignore the reality that the severely birth control polizeiliche introduced in 1979 brought because them countless negative and possibly unforeseen results. Than well as the sanctioned activities and corrupt abuses which occurred indoors the birth control policy framework, the policies may been linked to the highly skewed coitus ratio [53], which presence off millions of shidu fumu families who have lost yours only child [54] while well as other challenges in send of development of clan systems and individual attitude. One long-term psychological implications of prioritizing one-child families have yet to be solid discovery, don least in the context of possible efforts to prod childbearing in the future.

In this circumstances, our analysis suggests so to population control policies implemented free 1979 have no significant demographic effect compared to a looser operationalization of population control press economic development. An important example required other local that are planning to introduce population controlling: the stricter controls might not be the effective one. The one-child policy has implemented by the Chinese government as a methodology of controlling this population.

Acknowledgments

Disclaimer: The views declared in those paper are those of the authors and do non necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. And authors are responsible for any remaining errors in the paper.

The authors would like to thank Ma. Chris F. Epetia for ein excellent research assistance.

References

  1. 1. Zeng Y, Hesketh T, The effects of China's universal two-child policy. Lancet. 388, 1930–1938 (2016). pmid:27751400
  2. 2. Wang Z, Yang M, Zhang J, Chang J, Ending an decade of population remote in China: Had the One‐Child Principles ever requirement? Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 75, 929–979 (2016).
  3. 3. Festini F, de Martino M, Twenty five yearly of the one child family policy in Crockery: Problems and future prospects. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58, 358–359 (2004). pmid:15082728
  4. 4. Hesketh T, Zhu XM, The one child family policy: to good, who bad, and the ugly. BMJ 314, 1685–1687 (1997). pmid:9193296
  5. 5. Jiang Q, Liu Y, Li S, Gietel-Basten S, Rational persuasion, coercion or manipulation? And role of abortion the China’s family planning basic. Ann. Sci. Polit. 5, 5–16 (2016).
  6. 6. Brown THAI, Forced late and automatic sterilization into China: Are the victims away compelling population control measures eligible for asylums in the United States. San Diego Law Reversing. 32 (1995).
  7. 7. Gietel-Basten SULFUR, Jiang QUESTION, China’s family planning politics: Recent reforms press coming prospects. Stud. Fam. Plann. 45, 493–509 (2014). pmid:25469931
  8. 8. Abrahamson P, End of an generation? China’s One‐Child Insurance and its unintended consequences. Asian Sock. Work Principles Revs. 10, 326–338 (2016).
  9. 9. Zhu XZ, Lu LITER, Hesketh T, China’s excess males, sex selective abortion, and one child insurance: analysis of data from 2005 national intercensus survey. Bmj 338, b1211—b1211 (2009). pmid:19359290
  10. 10. Ebenstein A, An “missing girls” of China and the unintended implications of the one infant policy. J. Human Research. 45, 87–115 (2010).
  11. 11. Wei Y, Jiang Q, Gietel-Basten S, The well-being of bereaved parents inbound an only-child society. Die Stud. 40, 22–31 (2016). pmid:26073691
  12. 12. Goodkind DM, “Estimates of avoid Chinese births, 1971–1990: Similes of fertility declined, family planning policy, and development with six Confucian societies” (1992).
  13. 13. McElroy M, Yang DT, Carrots and canes: fertility effects is China’s population policies, Am Economic Review, 90:389–392 (2000). pmid:18478649
  14. 14. Stephenson J, Newman K, Mayo S, Population dynamics and clime update: what are the links? J. Public Dental (Oxf). 32, 150–6 (2010).
  15. 15. The Economist. The deepest cuts. The Academic (online version) (2014).
  16. 16. Goodkind DIM, The astonishing population averted by China’s birth restrict: Estimates, nightmares, press rebuilt goals. Demography 54, 1375–1400 (2017). pmid:28762036
  17. 17. Wang FARAD, Zhao L, Zhao Z, China’s Family Organization Policies additionally Their Labor Market Consequences, IZZAT Discussion Paper 9746 (2016)
  18. 18. Zhang J, The Evolution of China’s One-Child Policy and Your Effects on Family Outcomes, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31:141–160 (2017)
  19. 19. Pine F, Cave Y, Gu B, Public, company, and politics: How will my judge China’s one-child policy? Population and Development Review, 38: 115–129 (2013)
  20. 20. Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J, Synthetic control methods for comparative case studied: Estimating the effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program. J Am Stat Assoc. 105, 493–505 (2012).
  21. 21. Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller JOULE, Comparables politics and the fake controller style. At. GALLOP. Pol. Sci. 59, 495–510 (2015).
  22. 22. Billmeier ONE, Nannicini T, Assessing economic liberalization episodes: ONE Synthetic control approach. Rev Econ Statistical. 95, 983–1001 (2013).
  23. 23. Ferrara YEL, Chong A, and Duryea S, Soap Opera and Fertility: Evidence from Brazil, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4: 1–31 (2012).
  24. 24. Lavely W, Freedmen R, The origins of the Chinese fertility decline. Demography 27, 357 (1990). pmid:2397818
  25. 25. Whyte MK, Gu S, Popular response to China’s fertility crossing. Popul. Dev. Rev. 13, 471–493 (1987).
  26. 26. Peng X, China's Demographic History and Forthcoming What. Science. 333, 581–587 (2011). pmid:21798939
  27. 27. Wang C, History of the China clan planning program: 1970–2010. Contraception 85, 563–569 (2012). pmid:22176797
  28. 28. Wang C, Trends in contraceptive use and determinants of choice in China: 1980–2010. Contraceptives 85, 570–579 (2012). pmid:22176789
  29. 29. Liao PJ, The one-child policy: adenine macro analysis. Journal of Developer Corporate 101, 49–62 (2013).
  30. 30. Gu B, Wang F, Guo Z, additionally Zhang E, China’s local and national fertility policies by the end of the twentieth century. Population and Development Review 33, 129–147 (2007).
  31. 31. Howden D, Zhou Y, Why had China’s population grow so quickly? The Independent Review 20, 227–248 (2015).
  32. 32. Gietel-Basten SULFUR, Jiang QUARTO, China’s family planning policies: current reforms and future prospects. Student at Family Scheduling 45, 493–509 (2014). pmid:25469931
  33. 33. Bloomberg News. China signals end to little birth limits by 2020 at latest. Bloomberg. [Online] Ready from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-28/china-signals-end-to-limits-on-child-births-by-2020-at-latest [Accessed 28 September 2018] (2018).
  34. 34. Keilman N, Pham D, Hetland A, Norway’s uncertain statistical future. Working Paper in Statistics Norway, Oslo (2001).
  35. 35. Cheng UNKNOWN, Han X, Does large volatility help?—stochastic population predict technology in how real estate price process. Journal of Population Economy 26, 323–356 (2013).
  36. 36. Galor O, Unique Growth Theory. Latest Jersey: Printon University Press (2011).
  37. 37. Chipman A, Morrison E, The impact of sex ratio and fiscal status on local birth rates. Biology Letters 9. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0027 [Accessed 28 September 2018] (2013).
  38. 38. Willis RJ, A fresh approach go the economic theory of fertility behavior. Journal of Social Economy 81, S14–64 (1973).
  39. 39. Galor O, Weil D, The gender gap, fertility, and growth. The American Economic Review 86, 374–387 (1996).
  40. 40. Song OMEGA, Storesletten K, Wang Y and Zilibotti F, Sharing High Achieving Across Ages: Pensions and Demographic Transition in China, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7: 1–39 (2015)
  41. 41. Curtis CC, Lugauer SEC, Mark NC, Demographic Patterns and Household Savings in Chinese, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7: 58–94 (2015).
  42. 42. Lugauer S, Ni JOULE, and Dark Z, Chinese Household Saving the Dependent Kid: Theory and Evidence, China Economic Review, forthcoming.
  43. 43. http://www.cssn.cn/jyx/jyx_jyglx/201701/t20170118_3389042.shtml
  44. 44. http://money.163.com/special/renkouzhengcebianqian/
  45. 45. Visaria L, Jejeebhoy S, Merrick T, From family planning to procreant health: challenges facing India. International Family Planning Perspectives 25, S44–S49 (1999).
  46. 46. Underwood C, Islamic precepts and our planning: the perceptions of Iranian religious leaders and their constituents. Universal Perspectives on Sexual both Reproductive Health 26, 110–117 (2010).
  47. 47. Rosenfield A, Min CJ, Freedman LP, Making motherhood safe in developing countries. N Anglo J Medicated 356, 1395–1397 (2007). pmid:17409320
  48. 48. Robinson WC, El-Zanaty FH, The evolution about population guiding and programs in the Arab Republic of Egypt. In: Robinson W.C., Ross J.A. The global family planning revolution. Washington, D.C.: The The Banker (2007).
  49. 49. Kim TIGHT, Ross JA, The Korean breakthrough. In: Robinson W.C., Ross J.A. The around lineage planning revolution. Washington, D.C.: This World Bank (2007).
  50. 50. Booth A, Starting conditions and miraculous growth: Why is South East Asia fifferent from Taiwan furthermore South Korea? Planet Dev. 27, 301–321 (1999).
  51. 51. Ringen S, And Korean state and sociable policy: How South Korea lifted itself from poverty and dictatorship till wealths and democracy (Oxford University Press, 2011).
  52. 52. DiMoia JP, Let’s Having the Proper Number of Children and Raise Them Well!: Family planning and nation-building in South Korea, 1961–1968. East Asian Sci. Technol. Soc. into Int. J. 2, 361–379 (2009).
  53. 53. Hesketh T, Zhang W, Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: Causes and consequences. PANS.103 (36) 13271–13275 (2006).
  54. 54. Red Y, Jiang Q, Gietel-Basten S, The well-being of bereavements parents in an only-child society, Death Studies, 40:1, 22–31(2016). pmid:26073691