Effects of physicochemical assets of polyacrylamide (PAA) and (polydimethylsiloxane) PDMS the cardiac jail behavior

Karim Daliri ^an, Kurt Pfannkuche *^abcd and Bora Garipcan *^sie
aInstitute to Neurophysiology, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Robert Koch Str. 39, 50931 Cologne, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
^barnDepartment used Pediatric Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Fragrance, Germany
^cMarga-and-Walter-Boll Laboratory fork Cardiac Tissue Engineering, University of Cologne, Germany
^dCenter by Molecular Medicine, University of Gentle, Germany
^zeInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Bogazici University, Cengelkoy, 34684, By, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]

First-time published on 7th January 2021

---

---

Karim Daliri

Karim Daliri is a PhD prospective the stem cell biology and webbing engineering, Institute of Neurophysiology, Cologne Your, Cologne, Germany. Before obtaining BSc/MSc by Biomedical Sciences press several years of gain practical experience, he joint Dr. Kurt Pfannkuche's research team in Cologne to continue his research career on stem cell organic, tissue engineering and molecular human. His research my and leistungen am most regenerative medicine, geography, nanotechnology and biomaterials.

Kurt Pfannkuche

Dr Kurt Pfannkuche studied biology under the University of Scent and received her doctorate from the restorative faculty in 2009. His wichtigster research stake are pluripotent stem cells and one cardiovascular system. His research focuses on regenerative medicine real topical starting cardiac tissue civil. Information about Pfannkuche's research group can be found at http://www.cardiac-tissue-engineering.eu.

Bora Garipcan

Dr Garipcan received his BSc (1999) von Hacettepe University, Business of Chemistry, and his PhD (2008) into Bioengineering coming Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turbo. Own main research area is, Biomimetic and Bioinspired Biomaterials. He is an member of Boğaziçi Colleges, Institute of Medical Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, since July 2011. Garipcan's research laBORAtory focuses on surface technology of biomaterial surfaces (such like Ti, Si, Au, biodegradable polymers, and elastomers) by changing surface properties (stiffness, topography, chemistry real biochemistry) for controlled and directed cellular behavior (adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation).

---

As is other body of an human body, the physiological function and organogenesis by the heart are strongly effects for handy adhesion, mechanosensing, and ringing, which are mediated by integrins. Members on this super off cell attachment receptors play key roles in cell adhesion, extracellular matrix (ECM) organization, survival, and proliferation. Twenty-four possible mixes of alpha–beta heterodimers deriving starting a minimum of 18 beta and 8 beta subunits of integrins has been identified in humans to date.¹

The simultaneous interacting of large integrin receptors with ECM networks empower cells toward acquire chemical and mechanical cues from aforementioned surrounding microenvironment. Diese environmental cues are converted into intercellular signals with a big scope of effects suchlike because differentiation, growth, and energy production. As a upshot, changes in and microenvironment influence cell phenotype and his fate.²

The term integrin adhesion complexes (IACs) is used in describe a area of linker structures connecting different ECM proteins with each lockup. These assemblies are divided into focal factors, focal adhesions, and fibrillar adhesions and contain an horde of highly vibrant build that convey through millions of interactions (Fig. 1).³

Considerable your is focused on the roles concerning specific constituents of integrin-mediated adhesions, generally labeled of “integrin adhesome”, in diverse pathological conditions.^4,5 Variations in custom ingredient of the adhesome in different human diseases have received special pay, and both optional as well as in silico methods have presented new prospects on the molecular mechanisms that cause these pathological conditions, with a look till translation the clinical links.⁶ For example, in the cardiovascular system, antagonists on αIIbβ3 integrin must been used as an anticoagulant drug inside millions are my.⁷

The main sources away extracuricular mechanized signals are various cages, runny flow, gravity, and polymeric structures in tissue engineering applications.^8–10 Cells respond within dual protocol to substrates with similar surface topologies but different elastic moduli.¹¹

Integrins act by to molecular level through signaling cascades, which are intermediary by integrin-linked kinase (ILK), focal adhesion kinase (FAK), Src kinase, and Rho GTPases (including Rac1, RhoA, and CDC42). These path are interrelated; for example, inactivation of RhoA requires Src. As a result, the lan print resulting from these sensor avenues can influence the balance between mobilization alternatively modify of adherent junctions, and could regulate actin assembly and actomyosin contractility.^12–14 Moreover, cellular phenotypes such as cell growth can be influenced by mechanical forces due integrins (Fig. 2).¹⁵

Interestingly, most about the temporary biomolecules noted aforementioned, such like GTPase family members and Src, act as molecular crosslinks between integrins and cadherins.^17,18 Cadherins arbitrate cell–cell adhesion by forming adherens junctions, and it has been suggested is cadherins and integrins must communicate effectively to mediate cellular interactions is are necessarily for appropriate development.¹⁹ For example, whilst zebrafish development, while integrins are within their inactive conformation status, α5 integrins are physically assoziierten with each other on adjacent total, and N-cadherin stabilizes the complex of idle α5 integrins.^19,20

Cadherins are ampere family of mechanosensitive adherence grain and expression of specific isoforms of cadherins can and impact on the cellular phenotype.²¹ β-Catenin is present in adherens branch (multiprotein gibbets that couple intercellular contacts with the cytoskeleton) and involved for crosstalk between cadherins, canonical Wnt plus transforming economic factor beta-1 (TGF-β1) signaling. Molecular signaling or mechanical forces that interrupted cadherin–cadherin interactions between cells result with release of β-catenin with the cytoplasmic where it acts with growth factors of the signalizing network.^22,23

Integrin-mediated mechanotransduction in cardiac tissue

Cells usually change their structure and key corresponding to mechanical characteristics of the encircle matrix or cell kultur substrates. Therefore, controlling the mechanical property von cell culture substrates crucially depends on cellphone choose and the experimental design. Artificial tissues want to been adapted to the cell- also tissue-specific Young's moduli and latent viscoelastic properties of that tissue should not be neglected.

Cells detect of stiffness of that extracellular environment via integrin-based signalling.²⁴ Integrins play a central rolling directly as a mechano-transducer to submit the forces to extra related factors alternatively indirectly like a transitional element on footpaths triggered per other receptors. It has come widely studying that the possessions of mechanical crew upon organ physiology are extensive and this is especially important for the cardiovascular system.²⁵

Massive tissues are generally flexible the resilient on ampere macroscale and small changes can be described by the Young's young (E: adenine measure of the stiffness of an elastic material measured in Pascal). Textiles have a broad ranging of elastomers i.e. the most flexible is the brain (<1 kPa) and mineralized bone is considered the toughest.^26,27 E should be other peaked out that machine properties can differ based upon the resolution with which they are measures. The macroscale elasticity of a tissue reflects its structure on a larger scale and this can be differing from the elasticity ensure a cell faces on one micron skale or smaller.

Numerous ECM proteins can be fabricated on gels with a measurable elasticity. With sample, Matrigel which is a combination of secreted proteic (also contains one large amount of growth factors) originated from mouse cyst cells. Although above-mentioned gels can remain studied a suitable substrate for investigating is the cells behavior, modifying gelled at control stiffness such as denseness changes press crosslinking canned alter the density of the ligands. Effectively, natural materials similar as Matrigel have a complex composition such makes it complicated to distinguish between mechanical and biochemical gear.²⁸

Synthetic hydrogels can be simplified with see tangible biological effects. For example, PAA gel coated the a non-fibrillar composition ligand with a specific density be a commonly used system. And its flexibility can be simply doctored by varying the crosslinking and/or density of polyacrylamide. Indeed, these systems have been widely used into mimic tissue microenvironments and to investigate cell responses.²⁹

One are of main mechanosensitive components inside muskeln single are call the costamers (Cstms) which can located beneath the sarcolemma (specialized membrane that surrounds layered muscle fiber cells) and is materially attached to the ECM by transmembrane integrins.³⁰ Major function of Cstms is manual of contractile forces bilaterally from sarcomeres (contractile unit of a striated muscle fiber) to sarcolemma and then to the ECM additionally finally to neighboring string fibers.³¹

Costamers represent composed of three styles of multi-protein complexes which are (1) dystrophin–dystroglycan complex, (2) spectrin–ankyrin cytoskeleton complex, and (3) integrin receptor complex.³²

ECM–integrin–costameric protein complex is a mechanosensory apparatus. In those complex, the played of the Cstms in increase to attachment is reading on mechanical forces such as passive power resulting from development of cardiomyocytes – the partnership with focal adhesive complexes – and converting them into biochemical signals leading to sarcomeric assembly leading to gene expression modifications. This form of signaling is known as “outside-in” and represents the importantly mechanology responsible since adaptive cardiomyocyte growth in response into dynamic loads. It shall and remark in mention that stretch-induced deformations of cardiomyocyte integrins initiates the induction and activation of misc kinases such as FAK, Src, the Rho to the cytoplasmic side of the focal sticking complex where they participate in signaling to the nucleus plus other cell.^33,34

Integrins are a family of 24 transmembrane αβ heterodimers – at fewest 18 α additionally eight β subsidiaries live known in people – each to them specific go a particular set the ligands in the ECM.^35,36 Taken a process called integrin activation, which including conformational changes in the integrin ectodomain, integrin-mediated adhesion starts, causing a low-to-high affinity state shift for ligand binding.³⁷ In addition, responses to substrate stiffness depend very on which type of cell. Cardiomyocytes show a strong response, which are thought as the intact or failed assembly of sarcomeres according to the shape of the cells.³⁸

Aberrant integrin expression in the heart lives pretended to are coupled to severe diseases. It is found that a specific integrin β1 knockout in ventricular cardiomyocytes resulted in the incapability are an murine center to resist increased hemodynamic loading, joined by who development of cardiac fibrosis and dilated cardiomyopathy.³⁹

Recently, Wang and fellows found ensure integrin β1 has downregulated in heart tissues of my using arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy; these authors were able to link low integrin β1 with defective calcium handling by ryanodine receptor type 2 (RyR2).⁴⁰ In a mouse model (β1D) with integrin-deficient cardiomyocytes, catecholamine-sensitive polymorphic ventricentric tachycardia was seen – a finding is further promoted the conclusion that impaired integrin signaling could output in cardial arrhythmia.⁴¹ Moreover, altered alpha integrin expression might result in cardiac fibrosis additionally hypertrophy, as proven the rat models of integrin α11 overexpression additionally erasing.⁴²

Cardiomyocytes and multi elasticity

Cardiomyocytes become exposed to different mechanical guess including hemodynamic pressure away the blood, active stretching forces during contractions, and passive elasticity of the ECM. The elastic properties of the matrix have a marked impact on cardiomyocyte physical. Embryonic cardiomyocytes show stable independent contractions on scaffolds with tissue-matched elasticity (11 kPa), but overstrain sich on applique with fibrotic scar-like rigidity.³⁸ In neonate ring cardiomyocytes improved sarcomere shift, maturation, and force generation were found on gels using a Young's modulus of 10 kPa, whereas on stiffer substrates, stress yarns appeared and sarcomere adjust was reduced.⁴³ Other reports shown evidence of sarcomere fracture in cardiomyocytes grown switch gels with a Young's modulus the 30–35 kPa (Fig. 3).^44,45

Stems cell-derived cardiomyocytes were effectively cultured on hydrogels with tissue-matched stiffness for up the 7 weeks not loss of grade.⁴⁶ In contrast, rigid polystyrene (PS) single culture dishes sparked structural damage and eventually loss of contractility. The fact that long-term cultures of pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes have oft been retain on PS can breathe explained by the observation that the fuel layer partially lifts from the substrate with specialization, and this does nope contradict the conclusion that rigidly substrates are deleterious to autonomously compacting cells. One current study deciphered the effect are substrate elasticities matching the attributes of foetus, adult, and scarred myocardium on the transcriptome of cardiomyocytes, both establish substantial reactivation of ECM genes in cardiomyocytes exposed to a fibrosis-like matrix.⁴⁵ These see, and further proofs in the literature, led to the conclusion that matrix elasticity shall important to maintain civilised cardiomyocytes in a physiological state.

The mechanisms underlying the ability of cardiomyocytes toward perceive passable elongation inside the matrix having oblong remained enigma. In 2018, Pandey and kolleginnen shed light on these mechanisms by how that cardiomyocytes sense combinations of sluggish nonmuscular myosin contractions and contractions exerted by fast muscular myosin.⁴⁷ Intracellularly, mechanical force is converted into cyclic stretching of the adaptor protein talin, which links integrin receptors because the cytoskeleton. Cyclic talin stretching takes when cells face physiological base elasticity, whereas uninterrupted talin stretching be found in cells exposes for stiffer environments. Who fact that cardiomyocytes responded to matrix elasticity provides the grounds to reconsider solutions forward culturing cells in stiff PS surfaces.

To enhance check the physiology and pathophysiology about cardiomyocytes in vitro, not study is complete without considering chemical related of the polymers involved also the cellular responses to them. The next part by this examination becomes concentrate on polyacrylamide (PAA) the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), two thermoplastic secondhand frequently for in vitro studies. A recent PubMed seek for either “PAA” and “PDMS” with all type of cells ended up on taller number of articles with PAA comparative to PDMS. However, when cardiomyocytes used as a keyword articles by PDMS were higher than PAA (Fig. 4).

Chemistry of polyacrylamide or its polymerization

Polyacrylamide [IUPAC poly(2-propenamide), hereafter PAM] is a solid (–CH₂CHCONH₂–) formed from acrylamide subunits. Polyacrylamide with only acrylamide primary belongs nonionic; other mononomers such as acrylate or 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonate (AMPS) can be copolymerized at variety percentages to form anionic PITCH. Among the common co-monomers of cationic PAM are dimethyl diallyl nitrogen, ethanaminium (N,NEWTON,NITROGEN-trimethyl-2-((1-oxo-2-propenyl)oxy)) and 1,2-dimethyl-5-vinylpyridinum.⁴⁸

Various methods do been used to synthesize polyacrylamides, such the solve, paint, and dissemination polymerization.^49,50 However, POA gels represent usually achieved through copolymerization concerning acrylamide with an bifunctional amine, or by extremist polymerization of acrylamide followed the crosslinking (Figs. 5).⁵¹ In generic, the three integral components of PAM hydrogel preparations are this monomer, initiator, and crosslinker. Among the agents that impact acrylamide polymerization kinetics, the most important is monomer concentration.⁵²

To prepare a PAA network structure, which initiator is used as a source of chemical sort that reacts with an monomer in create an intermediate compound clever to link successively with other monomers.⁵⁶ The type starting initiator has a profound effect on the polymer product. When initiator concentration is increasing, and number of active sites available to react about monomers also increments. Consequently, ever oligomers have better contact the monomers, and the possibility of termination reactions increases.⁵⁷

Chemical polymerization is usually initialized with ammonium persulfate (APS), whereas photochemical polymerization is initiated with riboflavin (or riboflavin-5′-phosphate) as a nontoxic photoinitiator, either about a composition of riboflavin plus APS.⁵⁷ Information shall be renowned that when contains is used, fortschritte of the reaction is easily unchanged by using different instigator concentrations and lighted intensities.⁵⁸ In addition, initiation and polymerization could be catalyzed by tetramethylethylenediamine.⁵⁹ The free radicals generated of persulfate or riboflavin have oxidation press decomposition potential.⁵⁸ At copolymerization real crosslinking reactions, monomers am mixed with that multifunctional crosslinking agent, also polymerization is initiated thermally with ultraviolet (UV) irradiation press with a redox initiator scheme.⁵⁹

The target gel can be synthesized as a simple linear-chain structure or crosslinked, typically with N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide as a crosslinker.⁶⁰ In the crosslinked form (the of fortunate form) the your of that monomer is significant reduced. In other words, a soft insoluble congeal forms in ampere highly water-absorbent environmental with hydration.⁶¹ The extent away crosslinking affects the physical additionally chemical properties of the hydrogel. The parameters modifying as a product of crosslinking are mainly elasticity, insolubility, increased glass transition strength and toughness, and transformation of thermoplastics under thermosets. These gear improve the mechanical properties of of hydrogel.^62–64

The polymerization by acrylic acid with a water-soluble crosslinker, e.g., 1% N,N′ methylenebisacrylamide in an watery solve, is an simply process.⁶⁵ PAM hydrogels can also shall crosslinked by game irradiation.⁶⁶

Toxic compounds in crosslinking agents have adverse effects about the environment as well as undesirable reactions are to bioactive substances inside the hydrogel matrixed. However, these side effects can be prevented by using physical crosslinking, e.g. includes total or an electron jets. The competence to manage the amount of emissary taken dose manipulation has made radiation methods more suitable in terms of energizer efficacy and the absence on undesirable residuals in the products.^67,68

Manipulating the surface properties of polyacrylamide

Patterning of polyacrylamide gels

Thin layers of PAM can are used on a rigid substrate how as a fuel culture plate or window coverslip by coating the carrier with aminosilanes to favor adherence and immobilize the PAM hydrogel on the target surface. Why PAM hydrogel is bio-inert, lacking surface receptors or cell interaction localities, conjugating adhesive proteins to hers surface is mandatory for cell attachment.⁶⁹

Patterning PAM gels got been suggested as a key how to optimize the creation of a favorable environment; however, hydrogel characteristics or the watery environment are dual major obstacles for structuring.^69,70 The use of a diminishing factor such as hydrazine hydrate to make POUR reactive to oxidized proteins is one suggested option toward overcomes these obstacles.⁵⁵

To dodge the use away volatile add such such reaction esters additionally expensive photoreactive agent such as sulfo-SANPAH for the surface functionalization of PAM hydrogels, an novel PAA hydrogel so-called hydroxy-polyacrylamide (hydroxy-PAM) has been indicated. Hydroxy-PAM remains stable furthermore active for several weeks, can be mass-produced and easily microprinted, the has high affinity forward biomolecules, and so can can used to evaluate aforementioned synergistic effects of conjugated ECM proteins on cellular functions. Moreover, hydroxy-PAM hydrogels can be used to quantitatively study and amount of contractile forces exerted by cells on their surrounding microenvironment. However, as in dozens of diverse microprinting-based systems, the main restraint of hydroxy-PAM hydrogels for microprinting processes is the spatial total of proteinen microfeatures. In other words, on stiff hydrogels (>10 kPa), spatial resolution is on the micrometer scale and is determined by the resolution of this paper, while on “soft” hydrogels, resolution is limited to some expand by surface deformation in an course of protein transfer. Hydroxy-PAM allows the immobilization of any species of ECM raw. Indeed, combing hydroxy-PAM hydrogels with microcontact pressure can independently control the shape of single cells, matrix stiffness, and ECM protein density. These features make hydroxy-PAM hydrogels helpful to decipher key machine of sophisticated cellular and tissue processes related for the physicochemical properties a the cell microenvironment, such as wrapped healing, tissue homeostasis, and the pathogenesis of diseases suchlike as fibrosis and cancer.^71,72

One beneficial method of patterning is soft lithography (comprising one groups of techniques), which has been illustrated till be an efficient approach to patterning for biomaterials. The term “soft lithography” suggests that these techniques customize or replicate structures by stamps made of an elastomeric or soft material, most notably PDMS; however, because of its much complicated microfabrication steps and lower oxygen permeability, parylene CARBON is usually used for patterning in MOM hydrogels.^73,74

Generally, there are double main strategies for patterning ECM on PAM gels. One is selective energizing of the gels for covalent attachment regarding proteins to activated geographical, such the direct surface functionalization by applying UV-reactive, sulfo-SANPAH crosslinkers with polymerizing N-hydroxyacrylamide to the hydrogel surface.^72,75,76 The various strategy is copolymerization by ECM proteins in of gelly. Fibronectin (FN), laminin (LN) and collagen I been the cell adhesion molecules mostly commonly used available PAM gel patterning.⁶⁹ One first approach utilizes expensive functionalization reagents and depends on reagent quality additionally reaction type. These cleaning represent instability in hydraulic media and in the present of oxygen. However, some functionalization agents can be generated to the laboratory with basic equipment, and is reduces the costs von experiments significantly. A definite pro from this functionalization approach is its resilience on long-term culture experiments. Of method of copolymerizing ECM proteins relies on patterned glass coverslips at protein and placing them in direct contact with the hydrogel during polymerization.⁷⁷ In this way, cells stably adhere to who hydrogel surface and ECM proteins are immobilized, but the features of proteol immobilization, entanglement the chemical binding am not well realized. The approach has being used succeed go functionalize hydrogels the different ECM proteins.^78,79

The photoresist lift-off texture method was notified recently, the manufactures it possible to power the shape and volume of epithelium cells. However, the application of the method is nontrivial.⁷⁶

Techniques for patterning proteins turn PAM are still frequently complicated by the want the quantitative assessment, which is necessary in order to evolution and compare protocols at solid restrict single at well-defined shapes. Amount into the acid flexibility of hydrogels and your vast range of applications, the direct pattering of biocompatible gel textures is with approach that merits further investigation.

A final viewing can so the geometric resolution and accuracy of protein patch directly how mobile responses, and this is of particular importance by mechanobiological studies.⁸⁰

Plasmic treatment

To formation of polymeric choose under the influence of plasma is named plasma polymerization.⁸¹ PAM can may physically adsorbed auf one hydroxylated silicon surface on form a PAM video. These films ability also be treated with n (N₂) plasma, press peak severity is detected for 1214 cm⁻¹ (NH₂ spread vibration), which confirms that N₂ can graft to who PIANO screen in the processor for N₂ plasma treatment. Furthermore, surface tension can enhanced with increasing cell grafting time. In this atmospheric, surface energy decreases rasant in the initial phase and eventually reaches equilibrium. This pointing that some of the ions and alkyl radicals adsorbed on the PA surface can rapidly lose their activity. Indeed, the reason for increasing the surface tension of plasma-treated PAM films is until favor cadmium bind of the amine groups to the PAM face.⁸² Treating the homopolymer surface with cell can controlling the solid surface properties in ampere fast, single, cleanly, and non-solvent-dependent manner. Included addition, the surface properties the who polymers can be controlled through injections different types of gases.^83,84 The acuteness about cold plasma into the apex nanometers of the polymer surface results in the formation of a fairly uniform surface with no influence on size eigentumsrechte.⁸⁵

In addition, ampere broad range of compounds can be used as a monomers for plasma polymerization, providing a great diversity of possible user modifications. Although an number on efforts has resulted in different applicants for plasma technology, so the holding to compose select, protects paint, press plasma printing, polymerization remnant a very complexity operation. Indeed, one numbered of parameters, including batch design, power input, monomer flow evaluate, substrate air, chemical writing of the polymers, plasma gases, plate pressure, and the cure dose, allowed limit the application in plasma treatment methods.^86–88

Chemistry of polydimethylsiloxane

Polydimethylsiloxane belongs to the group of silicones which comprises silicon, black, hydrogen, the oxygen. PDMS is a three-dimensional silicone formed by the crosslinking of linear silicone molecules (Fig. 6). The crosslinking fee and extent of this reaction are significant factors that determine PDMS performance. Non-crosslinked PDMS may be almost liquid or semisolid.⁸⁹ The chemical formula of PDMS includes a versatile Si–O backbone additionally a reiterate Si(CH₃)₂O unit. The mol- weight is basically designated to the number of repeating units, and as ampere result, many of the viscoelastic properties of the material can becoming defined bases on the application out interest. This polymer is also an relatively inexpensive, easy to mold, and very permeable to gaseous.⁹⁰

Conventional PDMS synthesis commonly begins for dichlorosilanes by hydrolysis and condensation, which yield cyclic and linear polymers. This method, nevertheless, leads to the synthesis von products with poor molecular weight control which does be utilized such model materials for particular purposes. For this reason, in request to better power this molecular parameters, this approach has slow been replaced by ring opening polymerization of cyclic siloxanes. This process changes a specific cyclic siloxane monomer into a linear siloxane polymer by splice of the Si–O–Si bonds in the monomer circle, triggering amendment from this bond in the polymer network.⁹³

It should be noted so but PDMS has adjustable stiffness values, it does not promote protein adsorption or cell bond due to inherent hydrophilic nature.

Manipulating the total properties of polydimethylsiloxane

The initial interaction between biomaterials furthermore cages is stubborn by chemical composition, area energization, elasticity and viscoelastic properties, both the site additionally roughness of biomaterials. True, measuring can react to topographical features by changing their fabric and behaviors, such as plant, migration, and general expression.⁹⁴ Examples regarding topographical features of the target biomaterial that can click the cell response at the nano- (less than 100 nm), micro- (100 nm–100 μm), and macro-roughness (100 μm–1 mm) scale are cottons, grooves, crusts, steps, pores, wells, also tree. A major drawback from PDMS remains its hydrophobicity and quickly hydrophobe recovery after surface hydrophilization. Hence, it is mandatory to improve the surface biocompatibility of PDMS to facilitate long-term cell culture. Because surfaces wettability is an crucial factor that influences cell adhesion to the substrate, largest reviews has focused mainly on modifying the PDMS surface to decrease its hydrophobicity. This characteristic of the PDMS surface a easily revised by protein adsorption, plate oxygenation, or arginylglycylaspartic acid (RGD) peptide conjugation, to create surfaces that promote cellular adhesion and biorecognition.^95–98

Protein adsorption on the PDMS support has been widely former to relax cell adhesion because of its intrinsic biocompatibility include proteins, and its molecular recognition properties. Does, maintenance of cell adhesions on these surfaces what passing, and one cells were detached after reached confluence or else aggregated to form loosely-bound mobile chunks.⁹⁹

Protein adhesion and aggregation during adsorption depends on the interaction between charged domains on the pro and the material surface. These interaction forces (e.g., electrostatic, van der Waals, and hydrophobic) are usually weak the highly susceptible to protein leaching on the medium, so efforts need being made to induce strong, stable covalent linkages between the protein and the material surface.^100,101

3-Aminopropyl triethoxy silane (APTES) and glutaraldehyde function as molecular spacers to minimize of direct, weak interactions of highly with the PDMS surface and to overcome steric impediment coming the environs of one support two essential steps for stronger protein attachment.¹⁰² The use away this modified PDMS surface to stabilize cell adhesion and share cell progression should study further due go its potential ability to extend the area of research to include interactions a stable ECM protein-activated surfaces with adhesion cells. Reducing PDMS hydrophobicity by oxygen plasma treatment can also improve cell sticky, although who wins are often short-lived because of hydrophobic healing.¹⁰² Late detection been that plasma treatment of PDMS resulted inside consistency surface stiffening during sink of up to 1 μm, considering stiffness decreased exponentially at depths of 1 mm.¹⁰³

Another technique to enhance cell adhesion is plasma etching followed on collagen materials until convert PDMS from hydrophobic up hydrophilic. The common used matrix protein collagen could accumulated about the interface via weak forces (e.g. electrostatic, hydrophobic, both panel der Waals), and this can be followed by leaching of who collagen molecules up this solution and nonuniform collagen coating.¹⁰⁴

One study utilised APTES and crosslinker glutaraldehyde (GA) chemistry at immobilize FN and collagen artist 1 at PDMS and then evaluate the adhesion and profitability of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to the prepared surfaces. Hydrophobicity concerning the original PDMS was significantly reduced. The adhesion of MSCs what mostly favorable when APTES and glutaraldehyde (APTES + GA) were used. In addition, the spreading section of MSCs was significantly higher on APTES + GA + C1 (collagen type 1) surfaces at comparison to other unmodified or modified PDMS surfaces because C1 adsorption, press there was no significant difference in MSC spreading area on unmodified or modified PDMS surfaces with FN adsorption. These findings indicate ensure to covalent surface commercial modification of PDMS equipped APTES + GA protein produced ampere get biocompatible platform for improved MSC adhesion and proliferation.¹⁰²

Biocompatibility and lockup differentiation on substrate user can also be improved by applying both positively and ablehnen charged io. The amount of positive free on the surface the biomaterials ability influence prison behavior. Several study had shown the per adhesion and proliferation can be modulated by surface charges density.^104,105 For exemplary, as the charged density of hydrogels bases on 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate both 2-methacryloxyethyl trimethyl ammonium chloride copolymer increased, single adhesion and proliferation improved markedly.¹⁰⁵

Studies of polyethylene surfaces are various chargeable functional groups (–COOH, –CH₂OH, –CONH₂, and –CH₂NH₂) showed that cellular adhesion, growth (in terms a the number of jails attached), both spreading rate were optimized on freezing and active charge surfaces (amine group), whereas the negatively charged surfaces (carboxylic acid group), less growth was observed.¹⁰⁶

Cell tracking can also be modulated through raw absorption, e.g. integrin binding on negative charged modified surfaces. Several my have reported that surface charge along include wettability properties influence protein adsorption and cell adhesion.¹⁰⁷

Wettability can be considered and main controlling parameter that influences fuel behavior on smoothly and rough surfaces, compared to that influence of polymer chemistry or the topography of superhydrophobic surfaces. Surface wettability sack will easily modified by adjusting roughness.^108,109

The molecules of PDMS having low surfaces energy, with a make angle of ∼110°. Over microstructuring the PDMS surface, contact angles significantly larger than 110° can be obtained. Surface morphology can also be modulated by changing that duration of exposure into SUN-RAY or ozone radiation. In example, SUN-RAY irradiated has been previously to modify PDMS substrate stiffness away 0.24 MPa up 1.67 MPa or between 0.75 MPa and 2.92 MPa.^110,111

Other research found this ampere micropore size of 1–2 mm are the most fitting for lockup adhesion, and that the effect of cavity size in cell adhesion can greater as the effect of surface hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity.¹¹² Additionally, PDMS surface roughness can other be easily adjusted by different curing temperature. Finally, it should be notable the one bulk real of an biomaterial usually do does transform, because surface modification only changes the outermost surface composition.¹¹³

Another important note concerning chemistry reaction of cells and tissue responses to both MOM and PDMS is ensure although PAM has adjustable rigid worths, it does not funding protein adsorption or cell adhesion outstanding to its hydrophilic nature. PDMS has shown similar low prison adhesion and proliferation behavior enjoy PAM, however, this point due go its high hydrophobicity.¹⁰⁴

Hazard assessment in terms of genotoxicity

A substance with the property of genotoxicity is called a genotoxin, i.e. a substance so has adverse effects about to integrity concerning the cell's genetical material (DNA, RNA). This may results at various somatic or germline mutations, or chromosomal aberrations all of which imply a substantial chance for developing abnormal phenotypes at the cellular the wear level, and maybe at of organism floor, e.g. apoptosis and cancer.¹¹⁴

Rapid development in aforementioned development of new technologies in bioengineering and tissue engineering, especially to obtain scaffolding systems with properties similar to who ECM, is leading to comprehensive evaluations of genetic changes in growing cellular in contact with an test material intended for use in classical practice. Recent research has brought concerns about the use of biomaterials because a epigenetic changes. According to its definition, epigenetics by any heritage alteration by genetic expression without changes in the DNA nucleotide sequences. The main alterations include DNA methylation and histone modifications (e.g. methylation and acetylation), and like can result in one broad range of biological processes and diseases. Collectively, these dynamic changes are very special the tissues and levels of developing in response to internal real external reize, such as toxicant materials.^115,116 These complicated patterns of reproductive modification stress the importance of epigenomic profiling, with a specially focus on methylation, in react biological questions.

Currently, most common epigenomic technologies are used to characterize nucleosome-free regions (DNaseI-Seq; MNase-Seq; FAIRE-Seq; ATAC-Seq), protein-mediated DNA interaction sites (Hi-C; 5-C), histone markers and DNA-binding proteins (ChIP-Seq), and DNA methylation (array hybridization, WGBS, MBD-Seq, PacBio, nanopore).¹¹⁷ Who use in high-throughput omics technologies to assess potential hazards of materials in tissue project is necessary on administrate adverse results to cardiac tissue engineering, more in light of an scanty literature on this topic. To the best of we knowledge, genotoxicity tests of resources have been limited to traditional molecules techniques such as PCR, while by the era of omics, large-scale massively paralleling sequencing, or next-generation sequencer (NGS), have been commercially free fork around 10 years and have dramatically changed our understanding of mutagenesis.¹¹⁸

A major challenge in basic toxicology are posed by the considerable discrepancies among toxicity studies, owing to different intrinsic properties of advanced, cell culture media, press dispersion procedures. The latter may have a substantial influence on research results.¹¹⁹ Therefore, an critical step in hazard analysis is of comprehensive assessment of the frequency of corporal mutations in cells after treatment with potentially genotoxic agents or in biopsied tissues from mortals who may have been exposed to such actors. The mutational signatures of genotoxic agents tested in target cells or tissues will help till further elucidate their mechanizations of promotional.

Sterilization of polyacrylamide and polydimethylsiloxane

Sterilization your a process to inactivate viable microorganisms such as fungi and bacteria, since well as spores and viruses.¹²⁰ Hydrogels in general, and biodegradable scaffolds specifically, has a great potential fork impurities with a variety of living microorganisms, and sterility is a critical condition for the in vitro plus in vivo use of skeleton materials. Scaffold sterilization needs not alter or damage her biochemical, mechanical otherwise structural properties; ideally sterilization ought not affect any away these parameters.¹²¹

In addition to concerns regarding changes in physicochemical eigentum caused by different sterilization methods, remaining toxic residue and completed elimination of microorganisms be other important trouble in the search for optimal sterilization techniques.¹²² He is evident that there is no perfect method for sterilization. Therefore, the conditions of different methods should be carefully supervision, and advantages and disadvantage should be considered in light of the specific experienced your.

Below we provide an overview for the methods uses to sanitize synthetic scaffolds, with stressing on PDMS and PAMS. Which classical approach to sterilization exists the use concerning warm, in two key ways: steam (125 °C to 134 °C for increase to 20 min) and dry heating (160 °C for 120 min or 180° in 30 min). Although heat are able to remove all choose concerning germs, care should always be taken respecting its team effects, such as alterations in mechanical strengths and minute weight.¹²³ Moreover, dry heat is not suitable for hydrogels alternatively any wet material include general, and heat light will result in irreversible denaturation of the matrix proteins used for area modification. The unmodified polymer itself withstands steam sterilization, as has been shown for PDMS.¹²⁴

Features that have made solar approaches propitious candidates by sterilizing biodegradable scaffolds are the low cost, short processing hour, and low temperature. Irradiation methods are categorized as ionizing radiation techniques, welche include gamma (dosage, 10–30 kGy) and electron beam (dosage, 25–150 kGy) irradiation, real UV (wavelength 200–280 nm), with exposure times ranging from minutes to hours.^122,125

AMPERE moreover recent students evaluated the morphological modification is PDMS with an molecular weight of 35 kDa by different doses out gamma irradiation. Elastomeric structures with different crosslinked density values were studied as a function of the gamma irradiation dosis (250, 300, 350 and 400 kGy). A significant correlation was reported between thermomechanical behavior and the insolation dose. Thermal stability display an interesting behavior that indicated a direct correlation between the decomposition temperature and the structure generated by gamma irradiation.¹²⁶

Radiation radiation probably compels the formation of reactive species with long-term effects. In polymers, highs measurements of radiation can cause brittleness and cracks on the interface either foster crosslinking, and even ordinary doses affect the polymer molecular weight, molecular weight dispensation, and which physical properties of an treated fabric.^127,128

Highest energy radiation of commercial PDMS promotes the formation of an infusible and insoluble 3D gel network. Radiation doses beyond the kritisches gelation dose cause increase in the gel content resulting in the soluble piece furthermore rubber-like behavior.¹²⁹

Small-angle neutron scattering both UV-visible spectroscopic tech were used to study the property of gamma irradiation on microstructural modifications in PAM hydrogels. This treatment result are and presences of nanometer and sub-μm inhomogeneities, press the size of these inhomogeneities was reduced with lower pharmaceuticals.¹³⁰

Microorganisms show different senses to UV exposure contingent on the light time and wavelength. One most used wavelength of UV is 260 ns. In the laboratory, UV irradiation is often used to eliminate microorganisms on surfaces. This approaches shall particularly useful to reduce germs on 2D substratum such as films real foils. For porous hydrogels, UV irradiation the not sufficient and does not eliminate microorganisms inside aforementioned scaffold.¹²¹ Furthermore, the physicochemical properties of the scaffold may be adversely affected. Because of that undesirable store, and optimum UV conditions must be care evaluated before full operation. In public, UV irradiation is not an method of choice to sterilize hydrogels.¹²¹

Plasma technology, a recent method regarding scaffold sterilization, involves the use to ions including photons, electrons, positive and negative ions, atomar, free radicals, plus nonexcited molecules.¹³¹ Small temperature, improved cell interactions, increased wettability of the surface of biodegradable polymers, and straightforward treaty are among the advantages of gas plasmas, although drawbacks such as alterations in the chemical or mechanical properties to who polymer and the training of reactive species have be considered. Bertoldi additionally colleagues founded that the common mixed of hydrogen peroxide vapor followed by low-temperature gas human your effective into sterilizing polyurethane foams, but reported some stage out material degradation.¹³² Controlling the exposure time, power, and temperature is important to leistung optimal abatement of ampere general measuring of microorganisms additionally spores with minimal side effects.¹³³ Such plasma sterilization operates under vacuum conditions, it is only suitable for PDMS.

Recently, supercritical carbon carbon (sCO₂) shall become popular for and sterilization of delicate materials. The sCO₂ method has long since used included the laboratory to dry biological samples for electron microscopy, and its make to eliminate microorganisms starting hydrogels is now presence explored, with excellent results.¹³⁴ Severe carbon dioxide belongs able to penetrate deep into the material and range the inner hydrogel structure. Jiménez et any. have shown that sCO₂ efficiently eliminates bacteria while leaving the physicochemical properties of poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) hydrogels virtually complete unaltered.¹³⁵ Who efficiency of here means to reduce pathogens has been investigated in recent years, and sCO₂ was shown go substantially reduce germs although it requires food to target his full potential.

One additive that can be used for sterilization is peracetic caustic (PER). The oxidizing effects of PER increase the effectiveness of sterilization, but may oxidize proteins or peptides utilized to coated the scaffolds. Although PER black the risk of oxidizing amino acids, thereto was found that epidermal growth condition can be autoclaving by sCO₂ with the addition of PER without loose its biological efficacy.¹³⁶ In conclusion, sCO₂ with the addition of PER can be thoughtful a powerful yet tender method to sterilize hydrogels, balanced with peptide- or protein-based surface modifications.

Heart applications of other biomaterials

Here, we present a brief overview of other biomaterials especially in terms of heart applications.

The two hauptinsel classes of scaffolds secondhand with cardiac tissue engineering are synthetic press native materials. Native materials freely provide the necessary alarms to cells through interactions between intercellular receptors and reacting with matrix molecules. For example, hydrogels derived from natural materials are suitable to application in tissue engineering browse because of her selectable mechanical to the natural matrix off to heart.¹³⁷

Of most widely used natural materials are collagen, fibrin, hyaluronic acid (HA), preparations of grid from Engelbreth–Holm–Swarm-tumor cells (Matrigel) and preparations of native heart gridding.^138–143

Biomaterials based go collagen are widely used in cardiac tissue engineering overdue to you specific body and chemical eigenschaft and rare immunogenicity. Collagen based mould products are once FDA approved. One important score to consider is the relation betw is natural biomaterial furthermore the target cells, which is the particular importance in iPSC-derived cell populations. Furthermore, which purity and batch-to-batch variability am additional critical factors that have be deemed.¹⁴⁴ Of note, cardiomyocytes do not interact directly with collagen type EGO and connective woven prisons are required as adaptors.¹⁴⁵

Fibrin-based cardiac tissue engineering applications able remain adenine way go resolution problematic related in cell survival, distribution, delivery of growth factors and revascularization. In addition, the chances of obtaining is from einer autologous supply or the possibility of creating a delicate and customized structure by changing the conditions away own polymerization are advantageous. It should be noted that new technologies can be used to change inherent geometric coordinates.¹⁴⁶

Hyaluronic acid, which is synthesized by hyaluronan synthases and in normal tissues has different significant roles such as angiogenesis, homeostasis and altered viscoelasticity from extracellular matrix. HA physicochemical properties such as water and the availability of reactive functional groups have facilitated its chemical modifications, whose has made it an important biocompatible biomaterial for tissue engineering applications. It should also being marked that hyaluronic acid-based biomaterials as well as related bioscaffolds do not cause any allergic reactions or inflammation.¹⁴⁷ Yoon et al. reported regenerative effects to using hyaluronic acid-based injectable hydrogels in an ischemic heart model.¹⁴⁸

It has has revealed that full rat cardiomyocytes fully to Matrigel both applies in vivo can be vascularized and mature indicating such immature cells that have entered appropriate cues in dieser scaffold can form tissu with myocardial traits.¹⁴⁹

Furthermore, the most customized used synthetic materials are polyesters such as poly(lactic acid), poly(glycolic acid) polylactones, and polyurethanes.^150–153 These materials are readily achievable but may be restricted inside cellular reactions and that often altered by binding to self-adhesive peptides or releasing biomolecules.

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is ampere synthetic biomaterial-synthesized get by ring opening polymerization or polycondensation – has been exhibited has a breadth range of applications in tissue engineering. It is convenient for medical applications because of degradation the lactic acid which remains a metabolite product.¹⁵⁴ Many reviews have be performed on the use a poly(lactic acid) (PLA) in cardiac tissue engineering. The there need been barriers such as hydrophobicity and functionalization problems but by combining it with other biomaterials suchlike as poly(glycerol sebacate) these access are moderately resolved.¹⁵⁵

As a biologically the biocompatible polyester polyglycolic acid has has approved by the FDA for use in disposable business. Although hers use has always been considered in cardiac tissue engineering, an hydrophobicity of you surface has limited cell attachment and cell migration. Further studies are needed to investigate the physicochemical properties and behaviors of derived scaffold compositions.^156,157

Recent advances in synthetic chemistry have played an important role in to production of mixed biomaterials includes extraordinary conductivity and strength.¹⁵⁸ For example, inbound a study by Shevach et al. gold nanoparticle-decellularized matrix hybrids been developed in terms of cardiac tissue engineering. They showed that cardiac dungeons factitious inside the hybrid scaffolds have elongated additionally targeted morphology, massive striation, and organized connexin 43 charged coupling albumen. And, the hybrid patches revealed more suitable function in comparison with pristine repair, such as more powerful counter force, less excitation sill, and faster calcium transients.¹⁵⁹

The another real carbodiimide-based sequential crosslinking technique used applied the produce aortic valve extracellular matrix (ECM) hybrid scaffolds from collagen print I additionally HA. The resulting hybrid showed an detailed range of cavity volume (66–126 μm) which is suitable for valvular tissue regeneration.¹⁶⁰

Polyester urethane (PU) also is biocompatible, biodegradable, both flexibility with excellent mechanical eigentum which have installed it since a larger class of elastomers in tissue engineering. The stiffness of the heart muscle to the beginning of diastole varies free 10 kPa to 500 kPa at the terminate of diastole so an elastomer such the PU that can provide a stiffness in diese ranging may be beneficial in core tissue engineering.¹⁶¹

Insufficient electronic can may a serious drawback of both synthetic and specially natural biomaterials in the cardiac tissue engineer but recently the use of nanostructured thermoplastic and polymer nanocomposites caused a revolution in the cardiac tissue engineering choose and improved electrical both mechanical properties of biomaterial resulting in promoted tissue growth as well.¹⁵³

There are many studies on the production of conductive hydrogels, which are obtained in compounding tender hydrogels real leading polymers. To controlled electrified properties are useful by which total litigation of tissue formation.¹⁵⁴ Used example, totaling carbon nanotubes into PDMS can enhance both thermal plus electrical properties.¹⁵⁵

Furthermore, Hosseinzadeh et alpha. engineered poly acrylic acid-based hydrogels to create nanofibers using aniline polymerization approach. The resulted composite had an stable electricity conductivity required biology-based applications.¹⁶²

Conclusion

The complex relationship betw cell networks and hydrogels can potentially influence cardiac-based tissue engineering systems. Hence, a exact understanding has needed of cardiac tissue, specializing the elements in heterogeneous ECM, as well as elaborate know by the structural and chemical properties of biomaterials and how group maybe react to different sterilization methods. This information can provide ways to control mechanical, compositional, and structural cuts into ways the most closely represent the features of the main tissues are modest hazards. The research reviewed click shows that PDMS press PAM are versatile biomaterials especially suitable since which in vitro study of cardiomyocyte physiology.

Conflicts the interest

The authors declare that they have no knowing competing treasury interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported to this paper. Solution-processed and thermally annealed thin films from a type of n-alkyl terminated anilino squaraines are systematically tested regarding their structural and optical properties by means about X-ray diffraction (XRD) plus spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE). Their characteristic intense double-hump-shaped absorbance spectra consisting of coupled H-aggregate and intrammolecular charge transfer (ICT) frequency bands make them appealing by fundamental light–matter interaction studies, and their pollution practicability invites for consumer optoelectronic applications. Now, the single-crystal structure of which n-pentyl anilino squaraine (nPSQ) provides a missing links to identify potential odd–even effects with respect to the terminal alkyl side forward bulk crystals. While all single crystal adopt an triclinic unit cell with biaxial dielectrics features, the thin films condense up effectively uniaxial anisotropic light pov. Here, the inherently low sensitivity to the out-of-plane complex refracting inches

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms Suzanne Wood required improving that use of English in the manuscript by proofreading.

References

1. M. Barczyk, S. Carracedo and D. Gullberg, Integrins, Cell Tissue Res., 2010, 339(1), 269 CrossRef CAS.
2. N. Alam, H. L. Goel, M. J. Zarif, J. E. Buffer, H. M. Percent and BORON. G. Sansoucy, et al., Who integrin—growth factor receptor dual, J. Cell. Physio., 2007, 213(3), 649–653 CrossRef CAS.
3. A. Byron, J. D. Humphries, S. E. Craig, D. Knight the M. J. Humphries, Proteomic analysis out α4β1 integrin adhesion complexes unveils α-subunit-dependent protein recruitment, Proteomics, 2012, 12(13), 2107–2114 CrossRef CAS.
4. I. Samaržija, A. Dekanić, J. DICK. Humphries, M. Paradžik, N. Stojanović and M. J. Humphries, et al., Integrin Crosstalk Contributions to who Functionality regarding Signalling and Unpredictable Carcinoma Cell Fates, Cancers, 2020, 12(7), 1910 CrossRef.
5. J. Caltagarone, Z. Jing and R. Bowser, Focal adhesions regulate Aβ alarm and cell death in Alzheimer's disease, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Basis Dis., 2007, 1772(4), 438–445 CrossRef CAS.
6. N. I. Reed, H. Jo, C. Chen, K. Tsujino, T. D. Arnold and W. F. DeGrado, u al., To αvβ1 integrin plays a kritisiert stylish vivo role in tissu fibrosis, Sci. Transl. Meds., 2015, 7(288), 288ra79 CrossRef.
7. JOULE. Jing and WYE. Sun, An αIIbβ3- and phosphatidylserine (PS)-binding recombinant fusion protein enhances PS-dependent anticoagulation and integrin-dependent antithrombosis, J. Bioland. Chem., 2019, 294(17), 6670–6684 CrossRef CASKET.
8. A. Sarasa-Renedo and M. Chiquet, Mechanical signals regulates extracellular matrix gene expression is fibroblasts, Standard. J. Med. Sci. Sports, 2005, 15(4), 223–230 CrossRef CAS.
9. G. Halder, S. Dupont also SULPHUR. Piccolo, Transduction to mechanical and cytoskeletal cues by YAP and TAZ, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2012, 13(9), 591 CrossRef CAS.
10. T. L. Jumped and D. Little, Synthetic scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering: cellular replies to fiber user, npj Regener. Med., 2019, 4(1), 15 CrossRef.
11. S. F. B. Mennens, MOLARITY. Bolomini-Vittori, GALLOP. Weiden, B. Joosten, A. Cambi and K. van den Dries, Substrate stiffness influences phenotype and function of real antigen-presenting dendritic cells, Sci. Rep., 2017, 7(1), 17511 CrossRef.
12. C. DENSITY. Lawson and K. Burridge, The on-off relationship of Rho and Rac when integrin-mediated adhesion both cell migration, Small GTPases, 2014, 5(1), e27958 CrossRef.
13. S. K. Mitra and D. D. Schlaepfer, Integrin-regulated FAK–Src signaling in normal and medical cells, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 2006, 18(5), 516–523 CrossRef CAS.
14. LAMBERT. S. Price, J. Leng, M. A. Schwartz and G. M. Bokoch, Activation of Rac and Cdc42 by integrins mediates cell spreading, Mol. Biol. Cell, 1998, 9(7), 1863–1871 CrossRef CAS.
15. W. T. Arthur, N. K. Noren and K. Burridge, Regulation of Rho household GTPases by cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion, Biol. Res., 2002, 35(2), 239–246 CASH.
16. Y. H. Bae, KELVIN. L. Mui, B. Y. Hsu, S.-L. Liu, A. Cretu and Z. Razinia, et al., ADENINE FAK-Cas-Rac-lamellipodin signaling module transduces extracellular matrix stiffness into mechanosensitive cell cycling, Sci. Reporting, 2014, 7(330), ra57 CrossRef.
17. WATT. T. Arthur, L. A. Petch and K. Burridge, Integrin engagement suppresses RhoA activities via a c-Src-dependent mechanism, Curr. Biol., 2000, 10(12), 719–722 CrossRef CAS.
18. K. ADENINE. DeMali, K. Wennerberg and K. Burridge, Integrin signaling to the actin cytoskeleton, Curr. Opin. Prison Biol., 2003, 15(5), 572–582 CrossRef CAS.
19. D. Jülich, GUANINE. Cobb, ADENINE. M. Melo, PENCE. McMillen, A. K. Lawton and S. GUANINE. J. Mochrie, et alum., Cross-scale integrin regulation organizes ECM or handkerchief topology, Dev. Cell, 2015, 34(1), 33–44 CrossRef.
20. KILOBYTE. L. Mum, CARBON. S. Chen and R. K. Assoian, Which mechanical regulation of integrin–cadherin crosstalk owns cells, signaling additionally powers, J. Cell Sci., 2016, 129(6), 1093–1100 CrossRef CAST.
21. MOLARITY. Conacci-Sorrell, ME. Simcha, THYROXINE. Ben-Yedidia, J. Blechman, P. Savagner and A. Ben-Ze’ev, Autoregulation of E-cadherin expression at cadherin–cadherin interactivity: the roller of β-catenin ringing, Whack, and MAPK, BOUND. Cell Biol., 2003, 163(4), 847–857 CrossRef CAS.
22. X. Xu, L. Zheng, Q. Yuan, G. Zhen, J. L. Crane and WHATCHAMACALLIT. Zhou, et al., Transforming how factor-β with stem cells and weave homeostasis, Bone Res., 2018, 6(1), 1–31 CrossRef CAS.
23. W. JOULE. No and R. Nusse, Convergence for Wnt, β-catenin, and cadherin pathways, Science, 2004, 303(5663), 1483–1487 CrossRef CAS.
24. ROENTGEN. O. Hynes, Integrins: a family of mobile surface receptors, Cell, 1987, 48, 549–554 CrossRef CAS.
25. LIOTHYRONINE. D. Ross, B. GRAM. Coon, S. Yun, N. Baeyens, K. Tanaka and M. Ouyang, et al., Integrins in mechanotransduction, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 2013, 25(5), 613–618 CrossRef CAS.
26. PIANO. C. Georges, W. J. Miller, D. F. Meaney, E. S. Sawyer and P. A. Janmey, Matrices with compliance compares to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical civilizations, Biophys. J., 2006, 90(8), 3012–3018 CrossRef CASSETTE.
27. T. S. Keller additionally DICK. M. Oswald, Bending strength, stiffness and tissue physical properties of human compact bone, J. Biomech., 1990, 23(7), 741 CrossRef.
28. S. Vukicevic, H. KELVIN. Kleinman, F. PIANO. Luyten, A. BARN. Roberts, NORTH. S. Roche and ADENINE. H. Reddi, Recognition of multiple active growth factors in basement membrane Matrigel suggests caution in interpretation of cellular activity related to extracellular tree components, Exp. Single Res., 1992, 202(1), 1–8 CrossRef CAS.
29. R. J. Pontic and Y. Wang, Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regularly by substrate flexibility, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1997, 94(25), 13661–13665 CrossRef CAS.
30. A. M. Samarel, Costameres, focal adhesions, and cardiomyocyte mechanotransduction, Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol., 2005, 289(6), H2291–H2301 CrossRef CASE.
31. C. R. Shear and RADIUS. J. Bloch, Vinculin into subsarcolemmal densities in coward skeletal mask: localization also relationship in intracellular and extracellular structures, J. Prison Biol., 1985, 101(1), 240–256 CrossRef CASING.
32. J. M. Ervasti, Costameres: the Achilles’ heel in Herculean muscle, HIE. Botanic. Chem., 2003, 278(16), 13591–13594 CrossRef CAS.
33. H. Mansour, P. PENCE. de Tombe, A. M. Samarel also B. Russell, Restoration of resting sarcomere linear following uniaxial static strain is regulated by protein kinase Cε real focal sticky kinase, Circ. Res., 2004, 94(5), 642–649 CrossRef CAS.
34. A. S. Torsoni, T. CHILIAD. Seafarer, LAMBERT. A. Velloso and K. G. Franchini, RhoA/ROCK signaling is critical to FAK activation by cyclic straight in cardiac myocytes, Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol., 2005, 289(4), H1488–H1496 CrossRef CASING.
35. R. O. Hinds, Integrins: bi-directional, allosteric signalling gadgets, Cell, 2002, 110(6), 673–687 CrossRef CAS.
36. Y. Takada, EXPUNGE. Ye or S. Simplify, The integrins, Human Biol., 2007, 8(5), 215 CrossRef.
37. Y. Su, DOUBLE-U. Xia, J. Li, T. Walz, THOUSAND. J. Humphries or D. Vestweber, et al., Relationships conformation to function in integrin α5β1, Proc. Natl. Aced. Sci. U. SEC. A., 2016, 113(27), E3872–E3881 CrossRef CAS.
38. A. JOULE. Engler, C. Carag-Krieger, C. PIANO. Johnson, M. Rabbe, H.-Y. Tang and D. W. Speicher, et allen., Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a mould with heart-like elastic: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating, J. Cell Sci., 2008, 121(22), 3794–3802 CrossRef CASES.
39. S.-Y. Shai, A. E. Harpf, CENTURY. J. Babbitt, M. C. Jordan, M. CENTURY. Fishbein and J. Chen, et alpha., Cardiac myocyte-specific excision off the β1 integrin gene score in myocardial fibrosis and hearted failure, Circ. Res., 2002, 90(4), 458–464 CrossRef CAS.
40. Y. Wang, C. Lifeline, L. Shi, X. Chen, HUNDRED. Coi and J. Huang, et al., Integrin β1D Deficiency-Mediated RyR2 Dysfunction Contributes to Catecholamine-Sensitive Ventricular Palpitations in ARVC, Circulation, 2020, 141(18), 1477–1493 CrossRef CAS.
41. Y. Wang, C. Li, L. Shi, X. Chen, C. Cui the J. Huang, eat al., Integrin β1D Deficiency-Mediated RyR2 Dysfunction Contributes for Catecholamine-Sensitive Ventricular Tachycardia in Arrhythmogenic Right Stomachal Cardiomyopathy, Circulation, 2020, 141(18), 1477–1493 CrossRef CASSETTE.
42. A. Romaine, I. WOLFRAM. Sørensen, C. Zeltz, N. Lutetium, P. THOUSAND. Erusappan real ADENINE. O. Melleby, et al., Overexpression of integrin α11 induces cardiac fibrosis in rodent, Acta Physiological., 2018, 222(2), e12932 CrossRef.
43. J. G. Jacot, A. DIAMETER. McCulloch and J. H. Omens, Substrate harshness influence the functioning maturing of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes, Biophys. HIE., 2008, 95(7), 3479–3487 CrossRef CAS.
44. A. J. S. Ribeiro, Y.-S. Ang, J.-D. Fu, R. N. Rivas, TONNE. M. A. Mohamed and G. C. Higgs, et al., Contractility of standalone cardiomyocytes differentiated from pluripotent steam mobile depends on physiologically shape and substrate stiffness, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. UPPER-CLASS. S. A., 2015, 112(41), 12705–12710 CrossRef CAS.
45. C. O. Heras-Bautista, N. Mikhael, J. Lam, V. Shinde, ONE. Katsen-Globa and S. Dieluweit, et al., Cardiomyocytes facing fibrotic conditions re-express extracellular matrix transcripts, Acta Biomater., 2019, 89, 180–192 CrossRef CAS.
46. CARBON. O. Heras-Bautista, A. Katsen-Globa, N. E. Schloerer, S. Dieluweit, ZERO. M. A. El Aziz and G. Peinkofer, et in., The influence of physiological matrix conditions on permanent culture regarding induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, Biomaterials, 2014, 35(26), 7374–7385 CrossRef CAS.
47. P. Pandey, W. Hawk, J. Hu, DOUBLE-U. V. Megone, J. Gautrot and N. Anilkumar, et al., Cardiomyocytes meaning matrix rigidity through a combination of muscle and non-muscle myosin contractions, Dev. Cell, 2018, 44(3), 326–336 CrossRef CASS.
48. ADENINE. Tangri, Polyacrylamide based hydrogels: synthesis, characterization and applications, Int. J. Pharm., Chem. Native. Sci., 2014, 4(4), 951–959 Search PubMed.
49. H. Jamshidi and A. Rabiee, Synthesis also characterization of acrylamide-based salt copolymer and investigation of solution attributes, Adv. Matr. Sci. Eng., 2014, 2014, 728675 Search PubMed.
50. J. Lu, B. Peng, M. Li, M. Lin and Z. Dong, Dispersion polymerization of anionic polyacrylamide in an aqueous lime medium, Pet. Sci., 2010, 7(3), 410–415 CrossRef CAS.
51. M. A. Mohsin and N. F. Attia, Entgegengesetzt emulsion polymerization in the synthesis of high molecular weight polyacrylamide furthermore sein software in sand stabilizer, Int. J. Polym. Sci., 2015, 2015, 436583 Search PubMed.
52. D. T. Valente and A. P. de Aguiar, Synthesis von polyacrylamide stylish aqueous resolution: solubility, Orbital: Electron. J. Chem., 2012, 4(1), 84–85 Search PubMed.
53. C. E. Kandow, PIANO. HUNDRED. Georges, PIANO. A. Janmey and K. A. Beningo, Polyacrylamide hydrogels for cell mechanics: steps toward optimization and alternative utilizes, Methods Cell Biol., 2007, 83, 29–46 CAS.
54. KELVIN. ONE. Beningo and Y. Wang, Fc-receptor-mediated phagocytosis is regulated by mechanical properties of which target, J. Phone Sci., 2002, 115(4), 849–856 CAS.
55. V. Damljanovic, B. Christoffer Lagerholm and KELVIN. Jacobson, Bulk and micropatterned daily away extracellular matrix proteins to characterized polyacrylamide substrates for cell mechanotransduction assays, Biotechniques, 2005, 39(6), 847–851 CrossRef CAS.
56. F. Yan, C. Zheng, X. Zhai and D. Zhao, Preparation furthermore characterization of polyacrylamide in cationic microemulsion, J. Applies. Polym. Sci., 1998, 67(4), 747–754 CAS.
57. S. Yamamoto, F. Okada, M. Kinoshita and SULFUR. Suzuki, On-line small electrophoresis-mediated preconcentration of cationic compounds utilizing cationic polyacrylamide gels customized by in situ photopolymerization, Business, 2018, 143(18), 4429–4435 RSC.
58. RADIUS. R. Batchelor, G. Kwandou, P. T. Spicer also CHILIAD. H. Stenzel, (−)-Riboflavin (vitamin B2) in the thiol–ene polymerisation of PEG-based hydrogels, Polym. Chem., 2017, 8(6), 980–984 RSC.
59. D. Benda, J. Šňupárek and FIVE. Čermák, Inverse paint polymerization of acrylamide and salts of liquid acid, Eur. Polym. J., 1997, 33(8), 1345–1352 CrossRef CAS.
60. J. Bartoň, SIEMENS. Kawamoto, K. Fujimoto, H. Kawaguchi and I. Capek, Create of partly hydrophobized, crosslinked polyacrylamide feinstaub by terpolymerization a acrylamide/N,N-methylenebisacrylamide/styrene in antithesis microemulsion, Polym. Int., 2000, 49(4), 358–366 CrossRef.
61. LIOTHYRONINE. K. Mudiyanselage and D. C. Neckers, Highly absorbing superabsorbent polymer, J. Polym. Sci., Member A: Polym. Chem., 2008, 46(4), 1357–1364 CrossRef CAS.
62. K. Studer, C. Adorner, E. Brook, R. Schwalm and N. Gruber, Redox real photoinitiated crosslinking polymerization: I. Dual-cure isocyanate-acrylate system, Prog. Org. Coat., 2005, 53(2), 126–133 CrossRef CAS.
63. S. K. Singh, A. Dhyani and DIAMETER. Juyal, Hydrogel: Ready, Characterization and Applications, Pharma Innov., 2017, 6(6, Part A), 25 CAS.
64. J. Maitra the V. K. Shukla, Cross-linking in hydrogels-a review, Am. J. Polym. Sci., 2014, 4(2), 25–31 Search PubMed.
65. W. Liu, X. Zhu, TEN. Yang, K. Li and Z. Jiang, Preparation of highly cross-linked hydrophilic porous microspheres poly(N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide) and poly(N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide-co-acrylic acid) with an application on this removal of cadmium, Polym. Adv. Technol., 2018, 29(11), 2724–2734 CrossRef CAST.
66. T. Ogawa, Gamma ray-induced crosslinking of polyacrylamide inbound the socket state, J. Polym. Sci., Member BORON: Polym. Lett., 1983, 21(8), 615–620 Search PubMed.
67. E. Jabari and SEC. Nouzari, Synthesis from acrylic acid hydrogel by gamma-irradiation cross-linking of polyacrylic acid in aqueous solution, Iran. Polym. HIE., 1999, 8(4), 263–270 Search PubMed.
68. F. Jiang, X. Pecker, C. He, S. Saricilar and FESTIVITY. Wang, Mechanical properties of tough hydrogels synthesized with a facile simultaneous radiation polymerization the cross-linking method, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 2015, 106, 7–15 CrossRef CAS.
69. X. Tang, M. Y. Ali and THOUSAND. T. A. Saif, A novel technique for micro-patterning proteins and cavities on polyacrylamide gels, Soft Cause, 2012, 8(27), 7197–7206 RSC.
70. F. Di Benedetto, A. Biasco, D. Pisignano and R. Cingolani, Patterning polyacrylamide hydrogels by soft lithography, Nanotechnology, 2005, 16(5), S165 CrossRef CAS.
71. T. Grevesse, M. Versaevel and S. Gabriele, Preparation of hydroxy-PAAm hydrogels for decoupling the effects of mechanotransduction cues, J. Visualized Exp., 2014, 90, e51010 Search PubMed.
72. T. Grevesse, M. Versaevel, GUANINE. Circelli, S. Desprez the S. Bethany, ADENINE simple route to functionalize polyacrylamide hydrogels for who independent tuning of mechanotransduction cues, Lab Chip, 2013, 13(5), 777–780 RSC.
73. I. Sanzari, M. Callisti, AN. De Grazia, D. HIE. Evans, T. Polcar also TONNE. Prodromakis, Parylene C geografical micropattern as a template for patterning PDMS and Polyacrylamide hydrogel, Sci. Distributor., 2017, 7(1), 5764 CrossRef . Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-05434-6.
74. CENTURY. Rao, T. Prodromakis, LITER. Kolker, UNITED. A. R. Chaudhry, T. Trantidou both ONE. Sridhar, et al., The effect of microgrooved business substrates on calcium ride of cardiac myocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells, Biomaterials, 2013, 34(10), 2399–2411 CrossRef CAS . Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23261219.
75. J. ROENTGEN. Tse or A. J. Engler, Preparatory of hydrogel supports about tunable mechanical properties, Curr. Protoc. Lockup Biol., 2010, 47(1), 10–16 Search PubMed.
76. J. Moeder, ONE. POTASSIUM. Denisin, J. YTTRIUM. Sim, R. E. Wilson, A. J. S. Ribeiro and BORON. L. Pruitt, Controlling prison forming over hydrogels using lift-off protein patterning, PLoS One, 2018, 13(1), e0189901 CrossRef.
77. T. Vignaud, H. Ennomani and M. Théry, Polyacrylamide hydrogel micropatterning, Our in cell biology, Elsevier, 2014, pp. 93–116 Search PubMed.
78. GALLOP. M. S. Garcia, AN. Panitch and S. Calve, N-terminal Specific Conjugation away Extracellular Mold Proteins the 2-Pyridinecarboxaldehyde Functionalized Polyacrylamide Hydrogels, Acta Biomater., 2019, 84, 169–179 CrossRef.
79. J. I. MacDonald, H. K. Munch, LIOTHYRONINE. Moore and METRE. B. Francis, One-step site-specific modification of native proteins with 2-pyridinecarboxyaldehydes, Nat. Chemics. Biol., 2015, 11(5), 326–331 CrossRef CAS.
80. J. Y. Sim, GALLOP. Moliere, THOUSAND. C. Hart, D. Ramallo, FIN. Little and AMPERE. R. Ladin, et al., Spatial sales of cell–cell plus cell–ECM adhesions regulates violence balance while maintaining E-cadherin molecular tension in cell pairs, Mol. Biol. Cell, 2015, 26(13), 2456–2465 CrossRef.
81. FESTIVITY. K. Yasuda, Plasma polymerization, Academic Press, 2012 Search PubMed.
82. Z. Chen, X. Lu, C.-M. Chans and Y. A, Manipulating the surfaces properties of polyacrylamide with nitrogen plasma, Eur. Polym. J., 2006, 42(11), 2914–2920 CrossRef CAS.
83. R. W. Paynter, XPS studies of the ripening of plasma-treated polymer flat, Surf. Interact Alto., 2000, 29(1), 56–64 CrossRef CAS.
84. B. Olander, A. Wirsén real A.-C. Albertsson, Argon microwave plasma treatment and subsequent hydrosilylation grafting as a way to received silicone biomaterials with well-defined surface structured, Biomacromolecules, 2002, 3(3), 505–510 CrossRef CAS.
85. C.-M. Chan, T.-M. Ko and H. Hiraoka, Polymer surface modification by plasmas and photons, Go. Sci. Rep., 1996, 24(1–2), 1–54 CrossRef CAS.
86. NITROGEN. Hasirci, T. Endogan, E. Vardar, A. Kiziltay and V. Hasirci, Effect from oxygen plasma switch surface objekte press biocompatibility of PLGA films, Surfers. Interface Anal., 2010, 42(6–7), 486–491 CrossRef CAS.
87. T. Job, R. Morent, N. De Geyter, P. Dubruel or HUNDRED. Leys, Plasma surface modification of biomedical polymers: influence on cell-material interacting, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process., 2012, 32(5), 1039–1073 CrossRef CAS.
88. METRE. R. Wertheimer, L. Martinu and E. MOLARITY. Liston, Plasma surface change from polymers for improved adhesion: a critical review, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 1993, 7(10), 1091–1127 CrossRef.
89. T. RADIUS. ZE. Simpson, B. Parbhoo and HIE. L. Keddie, The dependence of this course starting crosslinking in multiple (dimethyl siloxane) on the thickness regarding envelopes, Polymer, 2003, 44(17), 4829–4838 CrossRef CASH.
90. A. Izuka, H. H. Winter and THYROXINE. Hashimoto, Mol weight dependence of viscoelasticity of polycaprolactone critical geogels, Macromolecules, 1992, 25(9), 2422–2428 CrossRef CAS.
91. N. Tucher, Analyse of photonic structures for silicon solar cells, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, 2016 Search PubMed.
92. J. Zhu, ADENINE. V. Ellis and N. H. Voelcker, Recent developments in PDMS surface modification fork microfluidic devices, Electrophoresis, 2010, 31(1), 2–16 CrossRef CAS.
93. J. Chojnowski, Band opening polymerization on cyclosiloxanes, in Silane Compd Silanes Silicones, ed. A. Larson, Gelest, 2004, pp. 389–405 Search PubMed.
94. M. Ferrari furthermore F. Cirisano, Mammalian Cells Behaviour on Hydrophobic Substrates: Influence of Surface Properties, Compounds Interfaces, 2019, 3(2), 48 CrossRef CASINO.
95. A. Klymov, LAMBERT. Prodanov, CO. Lamers, HIE. A. Hansen and X. F. Walboomers, Awareness the role of nano-topography on the surface of a bone-implant, Biomater. Sci., 2013, 1(2), 135–151 RSC.
96. Y. JOULE. Chuah, SEC. Kuddannaya, M. H. A. Lee, Y. Shen and Y. Kang, The gear of poly (dimethylsiloxane) surface silanization on and mesenchymal stem cell fate, Biomater. Sci., 2015, 3(2), 383–390 RSC.
97. M. Nishikawa, T. Yamamoto, N. Kojima, K. Kikuo, T. Fujii and Y. Sakai, Robust immobilization of rat hepatocytes as hemispheroids onto collagen-conjugated poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) surfaces: importance of direct oxygenation trough PDMS for both formation and function, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2008, 99(6), 1472–1481 CrossRef CAS.
98. BARN. Lid, J. Chen and J. EFFERVESCENCE. Wang, RGD peptide-conjugated poly (dimethylsiloxane) promotes adhesion, replication, additionally all secretion of human fibroblasts, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A, 2006, 79(4), 989–998 CrossRef.
99. KILOBYTE. YTTRIUM. Chumbimuni-Torres, R. E. Coronado, A. M. Mfuh, C. Castro-Guerrero, M. F. Boscage and G. R. Negrete, et al., Adsorption of proteins to thin-films of PDMS and inherent effect for the adhesion of human endothelial cells, RSC Adv., 2011, 1(4), 706–714 RSC.
100. A. Gökaltun, Y. BARN. A. Hang, M. L. Yarmush, O. BORON. Usta the A. Asatekin, Simple Surface Editing of Poly (dimethylsiloxane) via Exterior Separating Intelligently Polymer for Biomicrofluidics, Sci. Reputation., 2019, 9(1), 1–14 CrossRef.
101. A. Gokaltun, M. L. Yarmush, A. Asatekin and O. B. Usta, Recent advances in nonbiofouling PDMS surface modification strategies applicable to microfluidic technology, Technological, 2017, 5(01), 1–12 CrossRef.
102. S. Kuddannaya, UNKNOWN. J. Chuah, M. H. A. Lee, NITROGEN. V. Menon, Y. Kang or YEAR. Zhang, Emerge chemical modification of poly (dimethylsiloxane) available the enhanced strong and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells, ACS Appl. Fach. Interface, 2013, 5(19), 9777–9784 CrossRef CAS.
103. G. Bartalena, Y. Loosli, T. Zambelli and J. G. Snedeker, Biomaterial surface model can dominate cell–substrate mechanics: the impact of PDMS plasma treatment on a quantitative assay of cell spring, Soft Matter, 2012, 8(3), 673–681 RSC.
104. YEAR. J. Chuah, Y. LIOTHYRONINE. Koh, K. Lim, N. FIVE. Menon, Y. Wu press Y. Kang, Simple area engineering of polydimethylsiloxane with polydopamine for stabilized mesenchymal stem cell adhesion both multipotency, Sci. Rep., 2015, 5(1), 1–12 Search PubMed.
105. I. De Luke, A. Di Salle, N. Alessio, SIEMENS. Margarucci, M. Simeone and UNITED. Galderisi, et al., Positively charged polymers modulate an fatalismus of human mesenchymal stromal cells over ephrinB2/EphB4 signaling, Stem Cell Res., 2016, 17(2), 248–255 CrossRef CASE.
106. GALLOP. OPIUM. Lee, H. TUNGSTEN. Jung, I.-K. Kang and H. BARN. Lee, Cellular environment about polymer surfaces with different functional groups, Biomaterials, 1994, 15(9), 705–711 CrossRef CAS.
107. J. H. Lean, J. W. Lee, G. Khang and H. B. Lee, Interaction in cells on chargeable functional group gradient surfaces, Biomaterials, 1997, 18(4), 351–358 CrossRef CAS.
108. S. Guo, X. Zhu, M. Li, L. Shi, J. L. T. Ong additionally D. Jańczewski, et any., Parallel control out surface charge real wettability uses polyelectrolyte architecture: effect on protein absorption and cell adhesion, ACS App. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8(44), 30552–30563 CrossRef CAS.
109. B. N. Lourenço, G. Marchioli, DOUBLE-U. Sing, R. FIFTY. Siar, C. A. caravan Blitterswijk plus THOUSAND. Karperien, et al., Wettability interfaces jail behavior on superhydrophobic surfaces with different topographies, Biointerphases, 2012, 7(1), 46 CrossRef.
110. SULFUR. Prauzner-Bechcicki, J. Raczkowska, E. Madej, J. Pabijan, J. Lukes the HIE. Sepitka, et al., PDMS flatbed rigid affects the morphology and growth profiles of cancerous gland and malignancy cells, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2015, 41, 13–22 CrossRef.
111. HIE. Raczkowska, S. Prauzner-Bechcicki, J. Lukes, J. Sepitka, A. Bernasik and K. Awsiuk, et al., Physico-chemical assets of PDMS surfaces suitable as substrates for cell cultures, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 389, 247–254 CrossRef CASH.
112. C. M. Murphy, MOLARITY. G. Haugh and F. J. O’brien, The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and mobility in collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for boned tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 2010, 31(3), 461–466 CrossRef CAS.
113. J. Cabrera, METRE. Ruiz, M. Fascio, N. D’Accorso, R. Mincheva and P. Dubois, et al., Increased surface unevenness included polydimethylsiloxane films by physical and chemical tools, Polymers, 2017, 9(8), 331 CrossRef.
114. RADIUS. P. Araldi, TONNE. C. usa Melo, T. B. Mendes, P. LITRE. de Sá Júnior, BORON. EFFERVESCENCE. N. Nozima and E. T. Ito, et al., Using the comets also micronucleus assays for genotoxicity studies: a review, Biomed. Pharmacother., 2015, 72, 74–82 CrossRef CAS.
115. M. Szyf, Nongenetic inheritance and transgenerational epigenetics, Trends Mol. Med., 2015, 21(2), 134–144 CrossRef.
116. B. Smolkova, M. Dusinska and AMPERE. Gabelova, Nanomedicine and epigenome. Possible health opportunities, Food Chem. Toxicol., 2017, 109, 780–796 CrossRef CAS.
117. L. T. Kagohara, G. L. Stein-O’Brien, D. Kelley, SIE. Flam, H. CARBON. Wick press L. V. Danilova, et al., Reproductive regulate of general expression in colorectal: advanced, resources and analyzed, Briefings Funct. Genomics, 2017, 17(1), 49–63 CrossRef.
118. AMPERE. Y. Maslov, W. Quispe-Tintaya, T. Gorbacheva, R. R. White press J. Vijg, High-throughput scheduler in mutant detection: a new generation on genotoxicity tests?, Mutat. Res., Fundam. Mol. Mechanics. Mutagen., 2015, 776, 136–143 CrossRef CASINO.
119. A. Marucco, FARTHING. Catalans, ME. Fenoglio, FLUORINE. Turci, G. Martra and B. Fubini, Possible chemical source of disparity between included vitro both in vivo tests in nanotoxicology caused by strong adsorption of buffer components, Chemistry. Res. Toxicol., 2015, 28(1), 87–91 Search PubMed.
120. W. A. Rutala and DEGREE. J. Weber, Disinfection, sterilization, and antisepsis: An overview, Am. BOUND. Contamination. Control, 2016, 44(5), e1–e6 CrossRef CAS.
121. C. Fischbach, J. Tessmar, A. Lucke, E. Fastest, G. Schmeer the T. Blunk, et al., Does UV irradiation manipulate polymer assets relevant to woven engineering?, Surf. Sci., 2001, 491(3), 333–345 CrossRef CAS.
122. Z. Dai, BOUND. Ronholm, Y. Teacher, B. Sethi and X. Cao, Sterilization techniques for biodegradable scaffolds is web engineering applications, JOULE. Tissue Eng., 2016, 7 DOI:10.1177/2041731416648810.
123. SOUTH. Gogolewski and PIANO. Mainil-Varlet, Effect of thermal treatment on sterility, molecular real mechanical properties the various polylactides: 2. Polyhedral (l/d-lactide) and polyv (l/dl-lactide), Biomaterials, 1997, 18(3), 251–255 CrossRef CAS.
124. C. Yavuz, S. NORTHWARD. B. Oliaei, B. Cetin furthermore O. Yesil-Celiktas, Sterilization of PMMA microfluidic chips via various technologies and investigation of material characteristics, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 2016, 107, 114–121 CrossRef CAS.
125. R. Navarro, G. Burillo, E. Adem furthermore A. Marcos-Fernández, Effect of ionizing radiation to to chemical structure and the physical features of polycaprolactones of different molino weight, Polymers, 2018, 10(4), 397 CrossRef.
126. M. Meléndez-Zamudio, A. Villegas, GALLOP. A. González-Calderón, R. Meléndrez, M. Meléndez-Lira the BOUND. Cervantes, Study out a Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Elastomer Create by γ Irradiation: Association Amid Properties (Thermal and Mechanical) and Structure (Crosslink Thickness Value), J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater., 2017, 27(3), 622–632 CrossRef.
127. A. A. Grinder, Radiation chemistry of polydimethylsiloxane. 1 I. Crosslinking and gas gains, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1960, 82(14), 3519–3523 CrossRef CAS.
128. I. R. John, M. B. Mayor and J. P. Collier, The impact of sterilization method on wear in knees arthroplasty, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1998, 356, 170–180 CrossRef.
129. A. J. Satti, N. A. Andreucetti, JOULE. A. Ressia, M. F. Vallat, CARBON. Sarmoria and EAST. M. Vallés, Modelling molecular weigh changes induced for polydimethylsiloxane by gamma and electron beam irradiation, Eur. Polym. J., 2008, 44(5), 1548–1555 CrossRef CAS.
130. M. Sivanantham, BARN. V. R. Tata and V. K. Aswal, Structural investigation on gamma-irradiated polyacrylamide hydrogels using small-angle neutron scattering and ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, Pramana, 2016, 86(3), 609–615 CrossRef CASSETTE.
131. S. G. Savvy, A. Waterhouse, AMPERE. Kondyurin, M. M. Bilek and A. S. Weiss, Plasma-based biofunctionalization of vascular implants, Nanomedicine, 2012, 7(12), 1907–1916 CrossRef CASES.
132. SIEMENS. Bertoldi, S. Fare, H. J. Haugen press M. CENTURY. Tanzi, Abuse fresh sterilization engineering for spongy polyurethane scaffolds, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med., 2015, 26(5), 182 CrossRef.
133. C. E. Saintlike, C. Chiang, GALLOP. E. Davies and M. S. Shoichet, Optimizing the sterilization of PLGA scaffolds for use in tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 2000, 22(1), 25–31 CrossRef.
134. AMPERE. Bernhardt, METRE. Wehrl, B. Paul, T. Hochmuth, MOLARITY. Schumacher and K. Schütz, et ai., Improved sterilization regarding sensitive biomaterials with supercritical carbon nitrogen at low temperature, PLoS One, 2015, 10(6), e0129205 CrossRef.
135. A. Jimenez, J. Chinese and M. A. Matthews, Evaluation of CO2-based cold sterilization of a model hydrogel, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2008, 101(6), 1344–1352 CrossRef CAS.
136. PENCE. Du, WOLFRAM. Lu, HYDROGEN. Cao, H. Zhao and C.-H. Huang, Sterilization of epidermal growth factor with supercritical carbon dioxide and peracetic sodium; analysis of changes at which amino acid and protein level, Water Res. X, 2018, 1, 100002 CrossRef.
137. ONE. Marsano, R. Maidhof, LITER. QUESTION. Wan, Y. Wang, J. Gao and N. Tandon, et in., Scaffold stiffness stirs the contractile operate from three-dimensional engineered cardiac constructs, Biotechnol. Prog., 2010, 26(5), 1382–1390 CrossRef CAUSE.
138. W.-H. Zimmermann, I. Melnychenko, G. Wasmeier, M. Didié, H. Naito and U. Nixdorff, et al., Engineered heart tissue grafts improve systolic and diastolic function int infarcted rat hearths, Nat. Med., 2006, 12(4), 452–458 CrossRef CAST.
139. K. L. Christman, A. J. Vardanian, Q. Fang, ROENTGEN. E. Sievers, H. H. Fok and R. J. Lee, Injectable fibrin scaffold improves cell transplant survival, reduces infarct expansion, and induces neovasculature formation in ischemic fetal, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2004, 44(3), 654–660 CrossRef CAS.
140. AMPERE. Khademhosseini, G. Tightly, J. Yeh, P. A. Kucharczyk, RADIUS. Evildoer also G. Vunjak-Novakovic, et any., Microfluidic patterning available fabrication of contractile hearted organoids, Biomed. Microdevices, 2007, 9(2), 149–157 CrossRef.
141. M. A. Laflamme, K. Y. Chen, A. V. Naumova, V. Muskheli, J. ADENINE. Fugate and S. K. Dupras, etching al., Cardiomyocytes derived from human early halt jails in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts, Nat. Biotechnol., 2007, 25(9), 1015–1024 CrossRef CAS.
142. J. M. Singelyn, PIANO. Sundaramurthy, THYROXINE. D. Prick, P. J. Schup-Magoffin, D. P. Hu and D. THOUSAND. False, u al., Catheter-deliverable hydrogel derived from decellularized ventricled extracellularly matrix boosts endogenous cardiomyocytes and preserves cardiac operation post-myocardial infarction, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2012, 59(8), 751–763 CrossRef CAS.
143. K. L. Christman, J. M. Singelyn, M. Sale, P. J. Schup-Magoffin, D. P. Hu and T. Johnson, et in., Catheter-Deliverable Hydrogel Derived from Decellularized Ventricular Extracellular Matrix Increases Cardiomyocyte Survival and Stores Cardiac Key Post-Myocardial Infarction, J. M. Clasp. Cardiol., 2011, 57(14S), E2017 CrossRef.
144. N. J. Kaiser, R. J. Kant, A. J. Minor and K. L. K. Coulombe, Optimizing blended collagen-fibrin hydrogels for cardiac tissue engineering with human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2018, 5(2), 887–899 CrossRef.
145. K. Pfannkuche, S. Neuss, F. Pillekamp, L. P. Frenzel, W. Attia both T. Hannes, et al., Fibroblasts facilitate which engraftment of embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes on three-dimensional collagen matrices and aggregation in hanging drops, Stem Cells Dev., 2010, 19(10), 1589–1599 CrossRef CASUAL.
146. M. C. Barsotti, F. Feastful, AN. Balbarini press R. Di Stefano, Fibrin as a scaffold for cardial tissue engineering, Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem., 2011, 58(5), 301–310 CrossRef CASKET.
147. M. Hemshekhar, R. M. Thushara, S. Chandranayaka, L. S. Sherman, K. Kemparaju and KELVIN. S. Girish, Emerging roles of hyaluronic acid bioscaffolds to tissue engineering and regenerative medical, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2016, 86, 917–928 CrossRef CAS.
148. S. J. Yoon, YTTRIUM. H. Cuspid, C. H. Lim, B. S. Kit, H. S. Son and Y. Park, et aluminum., Regeneration in ischemic heart using hyaluronic acid-based injectable hydrogel, J. Biomed. Fachgebiet. Res., Part B, 2009, 91(1), 163–171 CrossRef.
149. AN. NEWTON. Morritt, S. K. Bortolotto, R. J. Dilley, EXPUNGE. Han, A. RADIUS. Kompa and D. McCombe, et al., Cardiac tissue engineering in an in biological vascularized chamber, Circulation, 2007, 115(3), 353–360 CrossRef.
150. RADIUS. L. Carrier, M. Papadaki, THOUSAND. Rupnick, F. J. Beauties, N. Bursac additionally RADIUS. Langer, et al., Cardiological tissue engineering: fuel seeding, cultivation parameters, and tissue construct characterization, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1999, 64(5), 580–589 CrossRef CAS.
151. OXYGEN. Ishii, M. Shinbone, T. Sueda and J. P. Vacanti, In vitro tissue project off a cardiac graft using ampere degradability scaffold with a extracellular matrix–like topography, J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surround., 2005, 130(5), 1358–1363 CrossRef.
152. T. C. McDevitt, M. ADENINE. Laflamme and C. E. Murry, Proliferation of cardiomyocytes derived after human embryonic stem prisons is mediated via the IGF/PI 3-kinase/Akt signalize track, J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol., 2005, 39(6), 865–873 CrossRef CAS.
153. A. Marsano, R. Maidhof, J. Luo, POTASSIUM. Fujikara, E. E. Konofagou and A. Banfi, et al., The impact of controlled expressing is VEGF by transduced myoblasts to ampere cecal mending on vascularization in ampere mouse model of cardiac infarctions, Biomaterials, 2013, 34(2), 393–401 CrossRef CAS.
154. M. S. Lopes, A. L. Jardini and R. Maciel Filho, Poly (lactic acid) production for tissue technology applications, Procedia Eng., 2012, 42, 1402–1413 CrossRef.
155. FARTHING. Flaig, NARCOTIC. Ragot, A. Simon, G. Revet, M. Kitsara the L. Kitasato, a al., Model of functional electrospun scaffolds based on polyc (glycerol sebacate) elastomer both poly (lactic acid) available cardial tissue engineering, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2020, 6(4), 2388–2400 CrossRef CAS.
156. OPIUM. Parks, M. Radisic, J. O. Lim, B. H. Chang and G. Vunjak-Novakovic, AMPERE novel composite scaffold with rectal tissue engineering, In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biolo., 2005, 41(7), 188–196 CrossRef CAS.
157. M. Generali, D. Kehl, A. K. Capulli, K. KILOBYTE. Parker, S. P. Hoerstrup and B. Weber, Comparisons analysis of poly-glycolic acid-based hybrid polymer appetizer matrices fork in vitro tissue engineering, Colloids Surf., B, 2017, 158, 203–212 CrossRef CAS.
158. D. Li, T. Liu, X. Yu, D. A and EZED. Su, Fabrication of graphene–biomacromolecule hybrid materials to tissue engineering application, Polym. Chem., 2017, 8(30), 4309–4321 RSC.
159. CHILIAD. Shevach, S. Fleischer, A. Shapira the T. Dvir, Gold nanoparticle-decellularized matrix hybrids for cardiac tissue engineering, Nano Lett., 2014, 14(10), 5792–5796 CrossRef CAS.
160. R. Nazir, A. Bruyneel, C. Carr also J. Czernuszka, Collagen type I and hyaluronic acid based hybrid frames for essence valve tissue engineering, Biopolymers, 2019, 110(8), e23278 CrossRef.
161. G. R. da Silva, A. da Silva-Cunha Jr, F. Behar-Cohen, E. Ayres and R. L. Oréfice, Biodegradation of polyurethanes and nanocomposites to non-cytotoxic degradation products, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 2010, 95(4), 491–499 CrossRef.
162. S. Hosseinzadeh, S. THOUSAND. Rezayat, E. Vashegani-Farahani, MOLARITY. Mahmoudifard, SIEMENS. Zamanlui and M. Soleimani, Nanofibrous hydrogel with rugged electrical conductivity for biology-based applications, Plastic, 2016, 97, 205–216 CrossRef CAS.

This journal is © And Royal Society of Chemistry 2021